22 Dec 16
Originally posted by EladarNo you were specifically not being asked to judge God. You were simply being evasive. I have found the discussion. It's interesting to be hearing your recollections of it.
Meaning I can't judge God. Maybe if you can actually find the discussion as opposed to telling me your recollections.
22 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFOh goody since I don't even know what conversation you are talking about.
No you were specifically not being asked to judge God. You were simply being evasive. I have found the discussion. It's interesting to be hearing your recollections of it.
Great recollections of mythical conversations. Idiot
22 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFI discussed your haranguing as best I could. The question was nonsensical. Not surprising, since you have no grasp of the concepts. You are misrepresenting me, yet again, for your own attempted sanctification.
If Suzianne doesn't want to debate or discuss anything, why does she follow me round the the debates and discussions on the Spirituality Forum pointedly posting ad hominems and other dodges and deflections?
Originally posted by SuzianneNot at all. I am trying to ascertain whether he believes "good works" are optional, but it's a point he refuses to be unequivocal about. He keeps using the belief that 'there is no salvation without faith' idea as a distraction. The question is not about that. You cannot have read the exchange if you are trying to dismiss it as "comparing apples and oranges". Perhaps you are being willfully wide of the mark?
No, just pointing out that you are comparing apples and oranges, as usual.
Originally posted by FMFWe are saved by faith and 'good works' is evdence of true faith. Without faith it is impossible to please God. So works done devoid of faith which are done to be seen by men and not to glorify God do not please God.
Not at all. I am trying to ascertain whether he believes "good works" are optional, but it's a point he refuses to be unequivocal about. He keeps using the belief that 'there is no salvation without faith' idea as a distraction. The question is not about that. You cannot have read the exchange if you are trying to dismiss it as "comparing apples and oranges". Perhaps you are being willfully wide of the mark?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkHe said that the thief on the cross is the example of cinversion at death.
1. Do you think the thief on the cross was saved?
2. Do you think he had good works?
So live as you wish, but right before you die make a statement of faith and good works don't matter.
Originally posted by EladarAn acceptable conversion at death results from repentance with a contrite heart. Only Christ can judge that. A statement of faith, of which you speak is of no value because it comes from the mouth and not the heart. God cannot be fooled with empty words. Its yet another example of the foolish man and of the Pharisees who focus on outward appearances and on mouth worship. You people are going to end up in the lake of fire with that amount of false doctrines and evil, greedy, selfish doctrines.
He said that the thief on the cross is the example of cinversion at death.
So live as you wish, but right before you die make a statement of faith and goid works don't matter.