04 Aug 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat is your definition of "pious hypocrisy"?
Whom was Kelly reprimanding?
04 Aug 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerHave you not been following? Have you lurched in without doing so?.
How could Kelly possibly be reprimanding Dive when he is ignoring him?
04 Aug 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou think KellyJay was reprimanding checkbaiter for ignoring checkbaiter's own post? Are you sure? Is that the position you are now going to take on this?
It seems you haven't been following. Kelly was responding to checkbaiter.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
04 Aug 17
2 edits
Originally posted by @fmfKelly addressed checkbaiter about his own post saying, "It seems some people's eyes just don't see this post for some reason, I guess it doesn't fit their mind set so they ignore it."
You think KellyJay was reprimanding checkbaiter for ignoring checkbaiter's own post? Are you sure? Is that the position you are now going to take on this?
He did not mention any names. He did not mention Divegeester now did he?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo, you've read the thread. You think KellyJay's little passive aggressive dig (of which there have been dozens and dozens over the last two years) was aimed at checkbaiter, the poster he was replying to?
Kelly said, "It seems some people's eyes just don't see this post for some reason, I guess it doesn't fit their mind set so they ignore it."
He did not mention any names.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
04 Aug 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @fmfNo he told checkbaiter that some people were ignoring his post. He did not mention any names. If Divegeester feels the shoe fits him that's fine with me. Kelly did not specifically mention Divegeester. I think his post could apply to quite a few people.
So, you've read the thread. You think KellyJay's little passive aggressive dig (of which there have been dozens and dozens over the last two years) was aimed at checkbaiter, the poster he was replying to?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
04 Aug 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @fmfNow that you suddenly realize that Kelly didn't specifically mention Divegeesters name in the 'reprimand' you are going to pretend that I'm the one who hasn't been following? Typical FMF.
dj2becker, are you basically conceding that you didn’t actually understand what this thread was about? Or are you going to plough on regardless ?
04 Aug 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo you are just going to plough on?
Now that you suddenly realize that Kelly didn't specifically mention Divegeesters name in the 'reprimand' you are going to pretend that I'm the one who hasn't been following?
04 Aug 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerKellyJay might appreciate your selfless, unprincipled support for him, but he might not appreciate the fact that you clearly cannot discern what he actually meant.
Now that you suddenly realize that Kelly didn't specifically mention Divegeesters name in the 'reprimand' you are going to pretend that I'm the one who hasn't been following? Typical FMF.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWho said he "specifically mentioned divegeester's name"?
Now that you suddenly realize that Kelly didn't specifically mention Divegeesters name in the 'reprimand' you are going to pretend that I'm the one who hasn't been following? Typical FMF.
Do you also have difficulty interpreting the facial expressions of the adults around you?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
04 Aug 17
3 edits
Originally posted by @fmfSo you agree he didn't?
Who said he "specifically mentioned divegeester's name"?
Do you also have difficulty interpreting the facial expressions of the adults around you?
As I said before, if Dive thinks the shoe fits him, good for him.
You must be seeing your own facial expressions on your screen.
04 Aug 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerPlough on. Be my guest. But read the thread in question again.
So you agree he didn't?