@deepthought saidIt's exactly this kind of intriguing question that injects the 'agnostic' into my 'lack of belief in a god or gods' and which makes "agnostic atheist" essentially the correct label for me.
So, the question becomes one of whether God is explained by the structure of our brains, or the structure of our brains explained by God. Is it a "true" religious experience or a delusion?
@wolfgang59 saidTrue, it happens.
The situation isn't helped by people who cannot spell or use apostrophes.
@wolfgang59 saidNeither is it helped by people belittling and mocking other people for their spelling.
The situation isn't helped by people who cannot spell or use apostrophes.
08 Nov 19
@dj2becker saidOn the contrary as KellyJay acknowledged.
Neither is it helped by people belittling and mocking other people for their spelling.
A shared language is the first step in communication;
accepted definitions, accepted spellings, accepted grammar,
then we can all understand each other.
A shared language is the first step in communication;
accepted definitions, accepted spellings, accepted grammar,
then we can all understand each other.
Do you mean like below here?
I tell you div, your memory is going. it's dementia or the booze.- wolfgang59
You need a capital I in the second sentence.
@wolfgang59 saidI agree with you; I don't always take the proper time to review what I have written. So I don't review spelling or punctuation as I should have. It is the same flaw in some of my chess games, as I hit the button to complete the move I see my mistake. Going a little to fast instead of taking my time and thoughtfully thinking it through, my bad.
On the contrary as KellyJay acknowledged.
A shared language is the first step in communication;
accepted definitions, accepted spellings, accepted grammar,
then we can all understand each other.
09 Nov 19
@sonship saidI once knew an Episcopalian priest who said he was an agnostic. He believed in God, but could not prove that his belief was true or that God really existed; he believed but did not know. So, there you have an example of an agnostic theist. If that is possible, then why not an agnostic non-theist or an agnostic atheist, too? The human response to the proposition of divinity is non-binary, but encompasses a spectrum.
Now Ghost if you understand Agnostic Athiest then YOU answer.
When an Atheist decides God may be discovered in the future even if unprovable, hasn't he moved from Atheist to Agnostic ?
When an Agnostic decides RATHER then "Possibly? But Can't Prove" he has total lack of belief in God's existence, is he still an Agnostic?
@kellyjay said'Too' not 'to.'
Going a little to fast instead of taking my time and thoughtfully thinking it through, my bad.
π²
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWon of Dee ways, I will get it write and than what willed you doo? π
'Too' not 'to.'
π²