19 Oct 10
Originally posted by menace71The fact is that even you should admit that if the story wasn't in the Bible, you would not believe that the man in question rose from the dead. Your arguments are made up to try and justify your beliefs, rather than you belief resting on the argument.
I believe however the problem is that there were Roman Centurions guarding the rock or stone placed over were Jesus was said to be laid. So you can explain that Jesus got snatched away by his followers but they would have had to fight and kill the centurions.
Manny
What is interesting is that you don't think your arguments through. If there were Roman Centurions guarding the rock, did they witness Jesus coming out? Maybe they moved it. We don't have any reports from them do we? And why would they have been guarding it anyway?
19 Oct 10
2 edits
Originally posted by twhiteheadFor no one TO remove it (the stone, that is, so they could retrieve his body), as they worried might be the case, and I believe they left after the recognized weekend, as it was their leave off.
The fact is that even you should admit that if the story wasn't in the Bible, you would not believe that the man in question rose from the dead. Your arguments are made up to try and justify your beliefs, rather than you belief resting on the argument.
What is interesting is that you don't think your arguments through. If there were Roman Centurions gu ...[text shortened]... . We don't have any reports from them do we? And why would they have been guarding it anyway?
What's so very sad is you choose not to open your eyes nor your ears to how magnificently wonderful YOU are, as Christ even clarified "These things I do, shall ye do also, and greater things than these."
Matthew 10:8 (King James Version)
8Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give.
19 Oct 10
Originally posted by karoly aczelOr he could just refrain from tacking his pointless and witless comments on to every thing he reads. If he was actively 'trolling' like Vish you could forgive it, at least you might get a laugh now and then, but he seems to want to add an inanity to every open thread just for the sake of it.
You think they could have a separate 'reply and quote ' button that doesn't bump the reply to the top of the thread. Things like "Amen",etc.
19 Oct 10
Originally posted by avalanchethecatIts a funny take on spirituality in a public forum.
Or he could just refrain from tacking his pointless and witless comments on to every thing he reads. If he was actively 'trolling' like Vish you could forgive it, at least you might get a laugh now and then, but he seems to want to add an inanity to every open thread just for the sake of it.
Doesn't spam supposed to say something?
19 Oct 10
1 edit
Originally posted by Agergpersonally i like his amens, =] and !, its more positive and encouraging than the now obligatory, 'i don't believe what you say, therefore you must be a liar.'
I hope you realise now that every thread taco has spammed with "amens" and such will be respammed with
"sorry"
then 2 hours later
"huhuhu I just love Jesus too much"
then a day later
"amen"
😵
19 Oct 10
Originally posted by twhiteheadActually it mentions to fire beings came down looking like lighting as it were. These were angels that freaked out the centurions.
The fact is that even you should admit that if the story wasn't in the Bible, you would not believe that the man in question rose from the dead. Your arguments are made up to try and justify your beliefs, rather than you belief resting on the argument.
What is interesting is that you don't think your arguments through. If there were Roman Centurions gu ...[text shortened]... . We don't have any reports from them do we? And why would they have been guarding it anyway?
Perhaps your right though if we did not have this record of the event then it might be harder to believe.
Manny