Go back
Does life have value?

Does life have value?

Spirituality

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by sonship
If [atheists] value human life most of them see nothing but a future of melting back into the dust of the earth for all people.
In other words, you create "value" in human life ~ and meaning in your own ~ by imagining - asserting - hoping - that death is not the end

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

It is a very difficult matter to see. But man's life is a kind of "vessel" a "container".

The created human life is a very valuable matter primarily because it was created to "contain" something. We were created to contain the Uncreated Life the Person of God.

Created life was designed (as in man's case) to be a vessel or container of the Uncreated and unseen Eternal Life.

When we read that man was created in the image of God and according to the likeness of God, it is good to think of this as a glove being made in the image of a human hand. The concept is not altogether physical as much as metaphysical, spiritual, mystical and divine.

The man created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26) is like a glove made in the image of a living hand. The glove is designed to contain the hand. Man is shaped in (if you will) a kind of "God shaped" design for the purpose of containing God.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

To leave the above brief word with one New Testament verse to highlight this, I would submit Second Corinthians 4:7 about the ministry of the apostles as pioneers in the new covenant.

"But we have this treasure in earthen vessels that the excellency of the power may be of God and not of us." (2 Cor. 4:7)


Created man - the earthen vessels.
Christ the Son of God - the treasure to live inside of the earthen vessels.

Created man - the vessel created to contain the excellency of an indestructible life.
God - the resurrection life, the indestructible life, the divine life and even the top human life.

As the peculiar shape of the glove reveals the shape of the hand which is to go inside of it, so man as a God shaped vessel was created that this unseen uncreated Divine Person might fill us in each and every aspect of our created being.

This is why God created man. And this is also what makes human life so valuable.
We can tell God boldly -

"God, I was made by You because You cannot be seen without manifesting Yourself in oneness with me. God you need my created life in order to manifest your uncreated divine Being. "

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
In other words, you create "value" in human life ~ and meaning in your own ~ by imagining - asserting - hoping - that death is not the end
Actually "eternal life" is more than I could ever really think to request.

Sometimes I sit astounded at the promises of Jesus Christ. The promise of "eternal life" seems something for which I did not think to conceive to ask.

Then I realized that "eternal life" does more than meet a need I have. It meets God's eternal purpose. God's eternal purpose requires humans to receive eternal life.

So the giving of eternal life is something in the vested self interest of the eternal God.

Expected pushback: "So then you are saying God has a selfish motive?"

Formulate some skeptical question.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

So Genesis 1 animals seem to proceed man's creation.
But Genesis 2 Adam precedes the animals creation.

Now why could God had made this less puzzling?
Couldn't Moses tell that this would cause some problems in understanding?
The same Moses who details the furniture and measurements and details of the tabernacle with such precision, surely must have anticipated his writing of Genesis 1 followed by Genesis 2 would cause us all some harmonization problems.

In BOTH accounts man is the crown of all creation.
In both accounts the utmost value is seen in human kind. Though he is one of the living creatures he is nonetheless unmistakably at the apex of them all.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by sonship
Sometimes I sit astounded at the promises of Jesus Christ. The promise of "eternal life" seems something for which I did not think to conceive to ask.
This promise for "something for which [you] did not think to conceive to ask" means you can value life while non-believers can't?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
2 edits

The value of human beings is also seen depicted in the closing description of the New Jerusalem at the end of history.

God is the light. And the light is in the Lamp. Grasp this.
I said God is the LIGHT and the LIGHT is inside shining out of the LAMP.
And the LAMP is the LAMB.

God is the LIGHT shining out to manifest Himself from within the LAMP of the LAMB of God.

" And the city has no need of the sun or of the moon that they should shine in it, for the glory of God illumined it, and its lamp is the Lamb. " (Rev. 21:23)


The Lamb is the Redeemer Jesus Christ - God incarnate.
The LIGHT is in the Redeemer Jesus Christ the "Lamb" .
The Redeemer - God incarnate is the LAMP - the LAMB / LAMP.

That what it says.
But that is not all.

The entire city is like the lamp shade. The glory of God in the God-man Jesus the Redeemer shine through the entire city. And the nations around the city walk in the light of the city.

"And he carried me away in spirit onto a great and high mountain and showed me the holy city Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God,

Having the glory of God. Her light was like a most precious stone, like a jasper stone, as clear as crystal." (21:10,11)


Think of billions of people as a collective lampshade. Yet a kind of transparent lampshade. In the center of the city is the Redeeming God-man. And the city is the redeemed God-men. The entire city is a manifestation of the unseen, uncreated, eternal and divine life dispensed into humanity.

This is how God chooses to be manifested in eternity.
This is how God chooses He must be seen in the universe.

The seasons still require night and day. But in the city, which is a symbol of the total mingling of God and humanity, there is no need for any light except God Himself.


"And night will be no more; and they have no need of the light of a lamp and of the light of the sun, for the Lord God will shine upon them; and they will reign forever and ever." (22:5)

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

In eternity past God had a plan to create the universe and to be manifested in it.
For this He created millions of items.
And for this He created many creatures.

He just said "Let them be". But with humanity He got more involved. With humanity He got more intimately related in a kind of counsel of the Triune God and said "Let Us ...".

With nothing else in creation did God say "Let Us" . But on the sixth day of His making He said it, concerning human beings.

"And God said, Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of heaven and over the cattle and over all the earth and over every creeping thing which creeps upon the earth.

And God created man in His own image; in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." (Gen. 1:26,27)


The reason for this greater intimacy and involvement of the "Us" of the triune God is because of man's special value to God. He wants to be SEEN in man. He wants to REIGN in man. He want man to be His deputy authority and manifest Him. He is invisible.
Man in His image and according to His likeness was created that the unseen and uncreated eternal Person might have a vessel in His image to be united with Him.

God is ever the Great Delegator.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by FMF
This promise for "something for which [you] did not think to conceive to ask" means you can value life while non-believers can't?
No.

An atheist though is hard pressed to ground his value of man.
Intuitively he feels it in his conscience.
That is because of the God created intuitive knowledge which takes no argument.
Or you might say the work of the law of God written in all created men's hearts.

So, no a theist is not the only one who knows man is valued.
But the Christian has a rational grounding for such value in the eternal value of the Creator.

The atheist denying God still has the intuitive sense of self worth and value but his rationale grounding for it flounders as he gropes around in darkness for a "Godless" explanation as to WHY he should be that way.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by sonship
An atheist though is hard pressed to ground his value of man.
You said that "most" non-believers you've discussed it with can't tell the difference - in terms of value of life - between human beings and cockroaches.

When you talk about someone trying"to ground" his value of man in something, by any chance, would the only thing you would accept as being able to "ground" one's perception of value, happen to be Jesus?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17
1 edit

Originally posted by sonship
The atheist denying God still has the intuitive sense of self worth and value but his rationale grounding for it flounders as he gropes around in darkness for a "Godless" explanation as to WHY he should be that way.


Some give up and embrace the void rather than fight against it.

"Dammit! We mean nothing and we just have to get use to it. Be a man ! "

The macho thought of keeping a stiff upper lip in the face of absurdity is kind of exhilarating to the ego for awhile.

Not all atheist end up on this route though.

Other maneuvers may point out that religion treats people badly in history. This excuse hope to rob the theist of any claim of theism being more value bestowing than atheism.
It is an argument.

Then others explain value itself as a fleeting self delusional term. Evolution kind of supplies us with some illusion as it gropes along toward who knows what? Real value is not objectively there.

Then some just hope to keep themselves busy enough with the mundane matters of life long enough to not have to think on it too much. Plenty of at least seemingly good things can be done aside from big questions like this. This to is an argument of some effectiveness IMO.

I say value is bestowed upon man from God.
God is the ground of worth, the ground of preciousness and value.
God is even the ground of being.

The cosmic buck just stops with God and we just have to get use to that.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by sonship
...the Christian has a rational grounding for such value in the eternal value of the Creator.
So you have talked to lots of atheists and none of them had "a rational grounding" for the value they place upon life or value they derive from life, is that what you are saying? You stumped them every time with the "cockroach" thing?

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by sonship
Does an atheist give more value to a mortal life than a theist?


Most of the atheists that I have talked with seem not to clear about the relative value of human life over the cockroach. In trying to escape from man being made in the image of God, they seem forced to dumb down humans to be just another animal.

If they value human li ...[text shortened]... that life does not really have value. Or groping for a bases of its value is a bleak exercise.
Actually, it sounds like you've not spoken to any atheists at all.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 May 17

Originally posted by FMF
You said that "most" non-believers you've discussed it with can't tell the difference - in terms of value of life - between human beings and cockroaches.

When you talk about someone trying"to ground" his value of man in something, by any chance, would the only thing you would accept as being able to "ground" one's perception of value, happen to be Jesus?
When you talk about someone trying"to ground" his value of man in something, by any chance, would the only thing you would accept as being able to "ground" one's perception of value, happen to be Jesus?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That is the best answer. And if I ask you to submit a better one, you would protest probably and reply - "Why do I have to do that ?"

In Jesus we have a practical and historical model of the man completely possessed by God for the eternal purpose of God.

That is why the impact of Jesus is so extraordinary as compared to the effect of any other man who has lived.

Without obscurity Jesus Christ manifest the perfect man and the complete God.
He in a sense resurrects two birds with one stone.

apathist
looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
Clock
28 May 17
1 edit

Originally posted by sonship...

I think if they were honest the ultimate answer for them is that life does not really have value. Or groping for a bases of its value is a bleak exercise.
The value is in the living of life. Btw, look up the word eupraxsophy .

You might enjoy this, too:
https://www.quora.com/Atheism-What-values-do-most-atheists-share
Lots of good answers. I'd say that it isn't merely that atheists don't believe in gods, but that they don't believe in creator gods.

For truth in advertising I should say that I am secular, atheist, and pagan. Isn't life interesting?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.