Evolution and meat: Berkeley University

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
be sure to include all the falsities in the veda.

never mind, that would take months.

Blurting out un-thought-out comments does nothing for your camp.

I do hope - you do not have one of those Phd,s that you can pick up out the back of a car-boot sale at the flea market.

Originally posted by RJHinds
God has appointed man to die once, then the judgment.

This is a falsity written by someone who had no clue to what is religion, spirituality and God.

Originally posted by Dasa
This is a falsity written by someone who had no clue to what is religion, spirituality and God.

Then prove your statement by common sense, logic, rational and honesty.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Then prove your statement by common sense, logic, rational and honesty.

By popular demand I am posting up an OP soon about this. (Bible falsities)

Originally posted by Dasa
By popular demand I am posting up an OP soon about this. (Bible falsities)

All atheists be alerted that we shall soon hear proof of errors in the Holy Bible
based on Dasa's "common sense, logic, rational and honesty" as he calls it.

Originally posted by Dasa
Blurting out un-thought-out comments does nothing for your camp.

I do hope - you do not have one of those Phd,s that you can pick up out the back of a car-boot sale at the flea market.

no, but even that would be an improvement over your uninformed rantings.

Originally posted by Dasa
By popular demand I am posting up an OP soon about this. (Bible falsities)

you don't have to bother, skeptics annotated bible has already found most of them.

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/

Originally posted by Dasa
Its really up to you to find those lists of errors - and re-read them again.

Why would I want to find lists of errors? I haven't asked you for lists of errors, and this is the third time I am pointing this out to you (and the third time you have avoided answering the question I did ask).

So now I will ask you a new question: why are you unable to answer the question that I did ask?

Originally posted by RJHinds
I haven't seen anything yet that is wrong with the Holy Bible.

But I am sure you have seen atheists (and others) claiming that there are things wrong with the Bible and even in some cases giving lists of those errors. So your earlier suggestion that a lack of such lists somehow supports the Bible being true is flawed.

Originally posted by RJHinds
But it is not prohibited either.

but weed is 😛

Originally posted by RJHinds
Your faith is in the wrong thing if it is in evolution. Evolution isn't
happening, so it will not solve man's problems.

Lol😀

(just goin through this thread)

Lol, and I'm only upto page two.
btw good points green paladin

Originally posted by RJHinds
I believe meat became required for man's survival as a result of the
fall of man resulting in the flood of Noah's day. Man fell (devolved).
Man did not rise (evolve). So after the flood God had to approve
certain animals as food for man due to the situation. There is no
possible way any creature can evolve without the hand of God. God
is allowing all creatures to devolve at present.

So before 'the Flood' people were vegans or vegetarians?

Originally posted by RJHinds
“If a man finds a girl who is a virgin, who is not engaged, and seizes her and lies with her and they are discovered, then the man who lay with her shall give to the girl’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall become his wife because he has violated her; he cannot divorce her all his days."

Deuteronomy 22:28

I have already replied to this sta ...[text shortened]... ut in place by Moses for
that time. It does not apply today. So there is nothing wrong here.

First, I responded by saying there is no time ever when this can be morally justified.
Your god is looking at a situation that is bad (men treating women like property and
having marrying and having sex with them against their will) and then making it worse.

Instead of saying "I am your god, do as I say or get hit by lightning" and instructing
people not to rape, and certainly if a woman has been raped, not to treat her with any
less care than if she hadn't, and to punish the rapist, not marry him off to his victim.
We instead get Deuteronomy 22:28~29...

And also, do tell where it says in the bible, these bits of the bible no longer apply....

And if they don't apply any more... why do they still print them.

Originally posted by googlefudge
First, I responded by saying there is no time ever when this can be morally justified.
Your god is looking at a situation that is bad (men treating women like property and
having marrying and having sex with them against their will) and then making it worse.

Instead of saying "I am your god, do as I say or get hit by lightning" and instructing
peo ...[text shortened]... ble no longer apply....

And if they don't apply any more... why do they still print them.

Are you implying that your example of a "situation that is bad" is universally understood,that it is a unversal truth? If no, then where do you get this standard from?
If so, then do you concede that there is an enternal, universal set of "guidelines" that apply to all people at all times, irrelvent of faith or not?

Originally posted by googlefudge
First, I responded by saying there is no time ever when this can be morally justified.
Your god is looking at a situation that is bad (men treating women like property and
having marrying and having sex with them against their will) and then making it worse.

Instead of saying "I am your god, do as I say or get hit by lightning" and instructing
peo ble no longer apply....

And if they don't apply any more... why do they still print them.

You don't think paying all that money to the father and being forced to
get married and take care of a wife for the rest of his life without the
chance to ever getting divorced is not punishment enough? You are a
hard man.

P.S. Jesus explained that Moses made some rules for the people due to
the hardness of their heart, but it was never meant to be that way from
the beginning. Jesus made a new covenant.