16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBut that's not all that your letter to the radio station "simply" said.
I simply wanted no more of my stories to be included on the show.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’ll leave it with you, you know where my head is at and despite it all, you know I’ll stick to it.
If I had been ripe with anger I would have reacted immediately. Surely?
But I did nothing at all, not one thing. I decided to rise above it. Knowing FMF was expecting some kind of reaction, I decided not to give him one. It was only when he did exactly the same thing the following week that I acted. - Hardly the actions of somebody fuelled by anger or vindictiveness. I simply wanted no more of my stories to be included on the show.
I’m going to watch some TV.
@fmf saidThis again is untrue. Last time I referenced the PM on this site you justified it by saying there couldn't have been anything you needed to respond to. Indeed, more than once I have referenced the 2 separate messages, one by email and one by PM. I swear to this on my life.
What abject fabrication is this, all of a sudden, never mentioned once in the last three and a half years? You have brass balls, and no integrity in this matter whatsoever.
Again, how did you read the deleted message last week?
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou are making this up. And a nobody on the internet swearing on his life means absolutely nothing. It just makes you sound desperate and creepy.
Indeed, more than once I have referenced the 2 separate messages, one by email and one by PM. I swear to this on my life.
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThen why did you make all the ridiculous viciously personal accusations that you did? Perhaps I should post its content here. Or just send it to people privately.
I didn't ask for your show to be taken off air. (Or expect that). I was fully aware of people like Phil who enjoyed submitting stories and was not looking to interfere with that.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidUsing a light-hearted pseudonym in order to squeeze a second onion into the show was not "vindictive".
Which one of us is vindictive?
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThis is a new freshly minted lie introduced for the first time 1,200 days after the event because this autopsy of it has not gone well for you.
One of the messages I sent you was on this site. We have discussed this before. It is a factual statement.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidGo on. Swear on the life of your mother. Swear on the life of all the baby seals. Swear on the life of your practitioner colleagues. Swear on the life of your pet if you have one. Go on. Really ram home your latest banter-gimmick.
. It is a factual statement.
16 Dec 23
@fmf saidGenuinely, every time I have referenced my 2 attempts to message you I have stated that one was by email and one by PM. In the last exchange I asked why you had delete it (the PM) without replying to it. I simply don't believe you don't remember this.
This is a new freshly minted lie introduced for the first time 1,200 days after the event because this autopsy of it has not gone well for you.
16 Dec 23
@fmf saidYou have stated you read a message last week that you actually deleted years ago without replying to. That's the bottom line.
Go on. Swear on the life of your mother. Swear on the life of all the baby seals. Swear on the life of your practitioner colleagues. Swear on the life of your pet if you have one. Go on. Really home your latest banter-gimmick.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou never contacted me about the use of a pseudonym.
Genuinely, every time I have referenced my 2 attempts to message you I have stated that one was by email and one by PM. In the last exchange I asked why you had delete it (the PM) without replying to it. I simply don't believe you don't remember this.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI dug out the emails last week. I haven't deleted any messages.
You have stated you read a message last week that you actually deleted years ago without replying to. That's the bottom line.