@divegeester saidIs the Father God?
Explain to me how ”Co-equal speaks to importance not author”, where did you pull this claim from, you just made it up didn’t you?
Is the Son God?
Is the Holy Spirit God?
13 May 22
@divegeester saidI'm asking you for your opinion; I know what I believe; I don't need you to
They are all the same spirit shared by “three beings” according to you 😆
tell me that.
14 May 22
@divegeester saidDon't run away!
You know what I believe don’t you? I’ve told you enough times.
14 May 22
@kellyjay saidIs this what you think I didn’t answer?
Is the Father God?
Is the Son God?
Is the Holy Spirit God?
My answer which won’t surprise you and will just leave you wondering why you’re making such a big deal out of it is this:
Of course they are all God!
God is ONE being, not THREE BEINGS sharing one spirit as you claim..
the Father is Jehovah, Jesus is Jehovah and the Holy Spirit is the spirit of Jehovah.
14 May 22
@divegeester saidSo they are all God, making them equal; you acknowledge that; we can start here
Is this what you think I didn’t answer?
My answer which won’t surprise you and will just leave you wondering why you’re making such a big deal out of it is this:
Of course they are all God!
God is ONE being, not THREE BEINGS sharing one spirit as you claim..
the Father is Jehovah, Jesus is Jehovah and the Holy Spirit is the spirit of Jehovah.
and agree we both believe this part at least?
@kellyjay saidNo I don’t acknowledge “they” “them” or any plurality of entity in the godhead.
So they are all God, making them equal; you acknowledge that; we can start here
and agree we both believe this part at least?
There is ONE spirit and ONE being who is manifested in multiple ways.
@divegeester saidIts a god dam crock thats what it is.
Trinitarians worship 2, Jesus AND the other person Jehovah.
Of course they should worship 3, the Holy Spirit also. But the 2nd God in the trinity said that the holy spirt “has not come to speak of himself” so they can’t.
Which is odd when you consider that the old Roman trinitarian creed says that all THREE of the people in the trinity are “co-equal”.
They rea ...[text shortened]... they clearly aren’t. You know… “according to scripture”.
Dear me, it’s a confusing mess isn’t it.
@divegeester saidIf they are one being, how are they not equal?
No I don’t acknowledge “they” “them” or any plurality of entity in the godhead.
There is ONE spirit and ONE being who is manifested in multiple ways.
If they are a "they," how are they not "a they" and not a "him"?
Manifesting differently, isn't that like changing into something else?
Scriptures clear God does not do that; there is no changing in God, no shadow of
turning. I said your view sounded like pantheism because they believe God
is manifesting differently throughout; you have god doing that in smaller ways
but doing it nonetheless. Don't run away dive, answer the questions!
@kellyjay saidWhy are you asking me?
If they are one being, how are they not equal?
If they are a "they," how are they not "a they" and not a "him"?
YOU are the person who claims there is one spirit shared by THREE distinct “beings”, not me.
YOU are the one who claims these 3 “beings” are all co-equal, not me.
I’m just debunking your man-made pagan doctrine of confusion using your words. It’s good fun.
15 May 22
@badradger saidThe @sonhouse is strong with this one.
Its a god dam crock thats what it is.
@divegeester saidI am asking you to explain how they are one and the same by your definition
Why are you asking me?
YOU are the person who claims there is one spirit shared by THREE distinct “beings”, not me.
YOU are the one who claims these 3 “beings” are all co-equal, not me.
I’m just debunking your man-made pagan doctrine of confusion using your words. It’s good fun.
and we have to disagree on the point they are equal?
I am asking you to explain how they can be called "they" when they are, according
to you, just a "He" only?
You have not debunked anything; you have only given your ideas on what is true
without being able to explain the meaning behind your words! You take the words
written and say they don't mean what they say as written; instead of saying "they,"
are really just "He" you imply a hidden meaning that contradicts the text as written.