- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
@FMF
Good one? Did I say something wrong?
You rarely say someting like that to me.
I mean rare like lips on a chicken.
For what it is worth to you, I and another Christian I know of considerabe experience have decided to get together and re-examine as if from ground zero, the entire concept of the lake of fire.
I told him about the debates here. And we have jointly decided to like "re-boot" with a clean slate the whole matter, coming to it with the re-examining attitude fair to naysayers such as Divegeester.
He is not a particpant in the forum here.
Pray for this. (That's right. Can it hurt to?)
17 Apr 22
@sonship saidWell according to your interpretation of NT outcomes, he either didn’t take “our need to be saved” seriously, or he was just utter failure at it as he only saves an alleged “few” but personally oversees the burning alive of billions in a place especially designed by him in advance and for that very purpose.
Did Jesus take our need to be saved seriously?
Or was it a frivolous matter to Him?
Thanks for asking that great question.
17 Apr 22
@sonship saidYou love your hell and eternal suffering and your version of Jesus loves it too!
Can anyone demonstrate through careful textural criticism of the NT documents that all words spoken by Jesus concerning hell were actually concocted after New Testament was written and inserted by malevolent scribes artificially?
Good luck with the evangelism by the way.
@sonship saidGreat question, seriously.
If eternal separation from God is a possibility should God leave the warning
ambigious, benigh, neutral, non-chalant, casual, possibly preferrable?
Or should He make it totally unambiguous that in no conceivble sense should such a fate be considered a good thing ?
Here’s a thread about it which you mostly avoided.
Thread 192828
17 Apr 22
@fmf saidThere are certain standards that seem written into the heart/mind call it what you will. Certain things that are prohibited, an anathema to people irrespective of religious conviction. As though some concept of morals/law is already seated within.
3. How can someone have morals if they don't believe in a divine lawgiver?
A good example is Kiddie Fiddling (pedophilia) which is still a great tabu (but those good people on the UK are trying to fix that one ..... again unfortunately)
There is a law within.
17 Apr 22
@divegeester saidI read a lot of what FMF says to me; sometimes I agree, sometimes I do not. Nothing about that has anything to do with what I asked you, but there you go. I'll read it.
As well as the article in my OP about hell and mental health…
Have you also not been reading FMF’s replies to you on this topic for the last few years?
Apparently not!