07 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterIll be waiting, in my office. Our lawyers are Jehovahs Witnesses, not some big shot lawyers, in it for the money. BTW did you notice how much the plaintiff asked for in compensation, originally? and she wasn't in it for the money. Neeext.
I would imagine, given your organisations complete transparent innocence, that they have some heavyweight lawyers involved right now to get that fistful of filthy dollars right back where it belongs?
07 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFtell me, have I not consistently stated that it is regrettable and also tell me, what facial expressions and tone of voice indicators led you to the conclusion that i am sneering, again your evidence please.
Someone sneering at a victim of sexual abuse on a 'Spirituality' forum. Whatever next?
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour post struck me as sneering, robbie. You have my first hand eye-witness testimony.
tell me, have I not consistently stated that it is regrettable and also tell me, what facial expressions and tone of voice indicators led you to the conclusion that i am sneering, again your evidence please.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe post immediately prior to the one where I described you as sneering at the victim of sexual abuse. I don't need you to agree with me, robbie.
answer the questions FMF, your evidence,
have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable
what evidence have you that I am sneering
07 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFagain your perceptions and personal testimony are meaningless, you are not a reliable witness and provide no empirical evidence ever to back up any of your claims. we are simply expected to give credence to your opinions simply because you say they are valid. Its a counterfeit currency which has absolutely no value in establishing any kind of truth and is meaningless to anyone but you.
Your post struck me as sneering, robbie. You have my first hand eye-witness testimony.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by FMFagain what evidence have you FMF, answer the question, have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable, yes or no,
The post immediately prior to the one where I described you as sneering at the victim of sexual abuse. I don't need you to agree with me, robbie.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe "evidence" is your post at the bottom of page 16. It's sneering.
again your perceptions and personal testimony are meaningless, you are not a reliable witness and provide no empirical evidence ever to back up any of your claims.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by FMFI don't think it is and given the fact that I have consistently stated, in this thread, that the action is regrettable, i have a personal body of testimony to back up my claim, now your evidence, if you please.
The "evidence" is your post at the bottom of page 16. It's sneering.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhich 'action' are you specifically talking about here? Are you talking about McKendricks 'action' or the Watchtowers 'action'?
again what evidence have you FMF, answer the question, have i not consistently stated that the action is regrettable, yes or no,
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou did not state that "the action is regrettable" in your sneering, misanthropic, petulant post at the bottom of page 16. Others will make what they will of your posts on the last few pages [including the one about the motivations of the victim of sexual abuse], just as I have.
I don't think it is and given the fact that I have consistently stated, in this thread, that the action is regrettable, i have a personal body of testimony to back up my claim, now your evidence, if you please.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by FMFagain your opinions are meaningless, you have no evidence other than your self certified opinions that i was sneering and once again we are meant to give credence to those because well, you say so. Have i not throughout this thread stated that the action is regrettable, please answer the question.
You did not state that "the action is regrettable" in your sneering, misanthropic, petulant post at the bottom of page 16. Others will make what they will of your posts on the last few pages [including the one about the motivations of the victim of sexual abuse], just as I have.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour post at the bottom of page 16 is you sneering at a victim of sexual abuse. I do not need you to admit it. Others can give my take on it what credence they want.
again your opinions are meaningless, you have no evidence other than your self certified opinions that i was sneering and once again we are meant to give credence to those because well, you say so. Have i not throughout this thread stated that the action is regrettable, please answer the question.
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobI am not questioning the motives of the plaintiff but simply why the original claim was so large. I am not stating that abuse has not occurred, i am not stating that it is not regrettable that it has occurred, i am simply trying to ascertain why the original claim was so much.
Which 'action' are you specifically talking about here? Are you talking about McKendricks 'action' or the Watchtowers 'action'?