06 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBits of them.
@Properknob, have you read the court papers?
06 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou make it sound as though your filthy leadership paid $10,000,000 to get the perverts out of your organisation, when in fact it was a punitive fine doing exactly the opposite! Unbelieveable.
The court ruled that it was medium, 10 million is a small price to pay to root out paedophiles.
06 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by rwingettWink, wink, sure you are.
Those who earn over $100,000 per year are cursed in the sight of god. Their temporal wealth blinds them to their spiritual poverty. Any template for success that is measured in the accumulation of personal wealth is one that is one that has been designed by the devil himself.
How's that? (even though I'm not a Christian).
So the imaginary god will curse them as they commit imaginary sins against him?
So why the $100,000 mark? My guess is because you are below it.
So when will you renounce mammon and take a vow of poverty Rwingett? You don't want to wind up in your imaginary hell, do you? 😵
06 Sep 12
Originally posted by mikelomInterestingly, about 89% are Hindus married to Jews. 😵
43% of Hindus
46% of Jews
......... I wonder how there is a difference between a Black's Christian's God, and a White's...... ? Could there be? Surely not?
And yet the Christians claim they are the biggest religion in the USA...... ahum?
What say ye white American Christians about this diversive?
-m. 🙁[/b]
06 Sep 12
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobThe matter is under appeal, if you can find any evidence in the court papers that the Watchtower and Bible tract society was responsible for this abuse then do so, I look forward to your evidence.
Bits of them.
For Immediate Release
June 20, 2012
Jehovah’s Witnesses to appeal jury verdict in California case
NEW YORK—Jehovah’s Witnesses will appeal the decision of a California jury in a court case involving alleged acts of child abuse.
The jury rendered a multimillion-dollar damage award to a woman who claimed that she was molested as a child by a member of a local congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses. At trial, the plaintiff claimed that the policies of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society contributed to the alleged abuse. “We respectfully disagree with the jury’s decision. This is the first time that an organization was found responsible for the alleged misdeeds of a member who held no position of leadership or authority,” states James McCabe, an attorney representing Watchtower in the case. “We are very sorry for whatever harm this young lady may have suffered. However, the organization is not responsible. We now look to the Court of Appeals for a thorough review of this case.”
J. R. Brown, a spokesman at the world headquarters of Jehovah’s Witnesses, commented: “The fact that Jehovah’s Witnesses abhor child abuse and strive to protect children from such acts is well-known. The individual members of any organization must ultimately bear the responsibility for their own actions, particularly when the acts are so flagrantly against the morals and principles of the organization and society.”
Related Links:
Web Article: Jehovah’s Witnesses and Child Protection
Video: Dealing with Child Abuse—Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Policy
Video: Inquiries on Child Abuse—Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Response
http://www.jw-media.org/usa/20120620.htm
06 Sep 12
2 edits
Originally posted by divegeesterThe most hollow vessels make the loudest noises. Filthy leadership, lets see, have you read the court papers, please provide the evidence that my 'filthy leadership', was directly responsible for this abuse as you are insinuating, or face the facts that you will be publicly exposed as a filthy liar and i will henceforth remind you of it in every single post that you make, your evidence, if you please and any quotations from the Daily Mail are not acceptable, it could not even get our beliefs correct.
You make it sound as though your filthy leadership paid $10,000,000 to get the perverts out of your organisation, when in fact it was a punitive fine doing exactly the opposite! Unbelieveable.
06 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat was the fine for?
The most hollow vessels make the loudest noises. Filthy leadership, lets see, have you read the court papers, please provide the evidence that my 'filthy leadership', was directly responsible for this abuse as you are insinuating, or face the facts that you will be publicly exposed as a filthy liar and i will henceforth remind you of it in every single post that you make, your evidence, if you please.
06 Sep 12
3 edits
oh dear, it seems that you have not read the court papers at all and yet here you are, you filthy liar, spouting off before you have even considered the evidence, what will you do now, goggle your usual hate sites, quote the daily Mail as your authority. Next you will be telling us that O. J Simpson never killed his wife, because that's what the jury stated.
06 Sep 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWipe your mouth between posts.
oh dear, it seems that you have not read the court papers at all and yet here you are, you filthy liar, spouting off before you have even considered the evidence, what will you do now, goggle your usual hate sites, quote the daily Mail as your authority.
06 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeestersorry, your evidence, if you please, you have produced, nada, as usual, you filthy liar. Lets add prejudice to your character, after all, anyone who responds to a case before they have considered the evidence must surely be fueling a prejudice, but we knew that already.
Wipe your mouth between posts.