Spirituality
16 Sep 23
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121464
@ghost-of-a-duke saidOh don’t worry Ghost of a Duke, I’ll get back to the little side topic of what Jesus really meant once I’ve finished running my fingers through your guts.
Bump.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
@divegeester saidIt's apparent you are unable to understand what has been said to you and were not sincere in you intent to answer the basic question about the text in question.
Ahh but that’s not what you said in your previous post is it Ghosty.
What you said was that you only prescribe your hollow pretence of trust to those people whom are living and whose retort might create some level disturbance in shallow sea that is your emotional condition.
In other words, you’re a spineless faux friend who’s loyalty extends no further than preven ...[text shortened]... eplessness… or to feel “broken” or “destroyed”.
As you are in the habit of feeling.
So I read.
I'll allow you to wallow instead in your bitterness.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
@divegeester saidNot a side topic. The very theme of the thread.
I’ll get back to the little side topic
Your bitterness is the side topic.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWell, I gave you a personal account of the circumstances surrounding the placement of TWO of your stories in shows 403 and 404 but you accused me of lying and then went on to make the deluded and paranoid cockamamie claim that I was supposedly deliberately sabotaging my own radio programme in order to humiliate you in the eyes of your family, when in fact it was your delusional email that was the attempt to sabotage the programme.
I have told you on numerous occasions that I give people the benefit of the doubt when they share personal accounts, not wishing to be the kind of person who accuses someone of lying about something that was actually true.
You even pressed on, narcissistically, with this delusion after I'd pointed out you'd completely got the wrong end of the stick.
So much, then for "not wishing to be the kind of person who accuses someone of lying about something that was actually true".
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
...and all because you flew into a fury when I told you - in private - that I didn't think your opinion of Suzianne was somehow "verified" compared to mine. That was your beef.
The next chapter in that story was the hysterical revenge ~ an email, which you pretended was from the local government you work for, clearly intended to get the radio programme taken off the air by making the delusional accusation.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
@fmf saidVery little of that bares any relation to what actually occurred, and are linking things which are not linked. We both know what actually happened, and it's a million miles from your contorted version. I'm content with that.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
...and all because you flew into a fury when I told you - in private - that I didn't think your opinion of Suzianne was somehow "verified" compared to mine. That was your beef.
The next chapter in that story was the hysterical revenge ~ an email, which you pretended was from the local government you work for, clearly intended to get the radio programme taken off the air by making the delusional accusation.
Fortunately you don't get to control conversations. If you having nothing relevant to say to the OP, jog on.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121464
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDodge noted.
It's apparent you are unable to understand what has been said to you and were not sincere in you intent to answer the basic question about the text in question.
I'll allow you to wallow instead in your bitterness.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidVery little of that bares any relation to what actually occurred, and are linking things which are not linked. We both know what actually happened, and it's a million miles from your contorted version.
Very little of that bares any relation to what actually occurred, and are linking things which are not linked. We both know what actually happened, and it's a million miles from your contorted version. I'm content with that.
Fortunately you don't get to control conversations. If you having nothing relevant to say to the OP, jog on.
You are either completely delusional or you are lying through your teeth. You decide. I know exactly what happened [i.e. why I put more than one of your stories in those shows] and your email to the radio station was paranoid/deluded or fabricated nonsense.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121464
23 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidLots of accusations of “bitterness” in your latest posts Ghost of a Duke.
Not a side topic. The very theme of the thread.
Your bitterness is the side topic.
Projecting much?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29783
23 Sep 23
@divegeester saidWhy are you unable to give your opinion on the biblical passage in question? Kelly has done so. You could easily parrot what he has written, or do a quick Google search to copy the opinion of somebody else.
Dodge noted.
Alternatively, you could join the conversation and give you view on why Jesus said he wasn't going to the festival, but went anyway in secret. Many people have understood that as an example of Jesus telling a lie. If you disagree with this, why?
23 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYour textbook case of deluded behaviour is completely relevant to the conversation that we have been having for the last 30+ pages.
Fortunately you don't get to control conversations. If you having nothing relevant to say to the OP, jog on.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121464
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAgain then….
I have told you on numerous occasions that I give people the benefit of the doubt when they share personal accounts, not wishing to be the kind of person who accuses someone of lying about something that was actually true.
You may have an uncanny ability to know with certainty when an account shared is true or not, but for us mere mortals it is more human to be mor ...[text shortened]... d once I had answered your question. (Which I have). Was that a lie, or are you now going to do so?
…but that’s not what you said in your previous post is it Ghost of a duke.
What you described of yourself was that you only offer your trust to those people whom are living and whose retort might create some level disturbance in shallow sea that is your emotional condition.
In other words, you’re a spineless faux friend who’s loyalty extends no further than preventing interpersonal conflict which might cause you some sleeplessness… or to feel “broken” or “destroyed”.
I on the other am not the kind of friend who not only tells people, living people, what is nice. I tell them the truth.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121464
23 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI am able to, I just don’t want to. Yet.
Why are you unable to give your opinion on the biblical passage in question?
Because I’d rather talk about you.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121464
23 Sep 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’ve already commented on this earlier in the thread.
Many people have understood that as an example of Jesus telling a lie. If you disagree with this, why?