05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayWhy do you think the killing of "innocent [human] life" is morally wrong?
Yes, you?
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraKilling an innocent needs explained to you? Seriously, you are asking that?
Why do you think the killing of "innocent [human] life" is morally wrong?
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayYes it does, but if one goes to one extreme or the other one ends up with Satanic beliefs.
The scripture says a lot of things, some you even get right.
The key is knowing debatable matters vs God's truth. To treat all subjects as debatable matters is Satanic.
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @eladarYou give Satan to much power, he doesn't need help. People can screw up loving one
Yes it does, but if one goes to one extreme or the other one ends up with Satanic beliefs.
The key is knowing debatable matters vs God's truth. To treat all subjects as debatable matters is Satanic.
another without demonic activity.
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayYes. I don't think many people feel that embryo's are "guilty" of anything, yet many do feel it is not morally wrong to kill them or allow them to perish. So it is not obvious that "innocence," in and of itself, is sufficient to warrant intervention in order to protect it.
Killing an innocent needs explained to you? Seriously, you are asking that?
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraHow many sperm died the last time you jerked off?
Yes. I don't think many people feel that embryo's are "guilty" of anything, yet many do feel it is not morally wrong to kill them or allow them to perish. So it is not obvious that "innocence," in and of itself, is sufficient to warrant intervention in order to protect it.
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraLife is either important or not, if it is than in all stages it is. The beginning of a life may not
Yes. I don't think many people feel that embryo's are "guilty" of anything, yet many do feel it is not morally wrong to kill them or allow them to perish. So it is not obvious that "innocence," in and of itself, is sufficient to warrant intervention in order to protect it.
be something you can see and hold, but without it, nothing else will develop. So unless
you want to invalidate a human life for cause, than let the causes begin to be named. We
have seen people belittled for color, nationality, age, and a number of other things. Are
you an outsight out of mind guy, if you cannot see him or her, they are not important?
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayYes kelly. Let's populate the earth till the balance point tips and we all starve to death while we sit in our own filth. Glory God, right? He didn't give us brains so that we could figure out when we are being stupid.
Life is either important or not, if it is than in all stages it is. The beginning of a life may not
be something you can see and hold, but without it, nothing else will develop. So unless
you want to invalidate a human life for cause, than let the causes begin to be named. We
have seen people belittled for color, nationality, age, and a number of other things. Are
you an outsight out of mind guy, if you cannot see him or her, they are not important?
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @apathistSo you want to kill off some to avoid others from dying?
Yes kelly. Let's populate the earth till the balance point tips and we all starve to death while we sit in our own filth. Glory God, right? He didn't give us brains so that we could figure out when we are being stupid.
Picking and choosing are you!
Why not kill off the poor, and elderly using your logic?
If someone cannot produce for the good of the whole, lets make Soylent Green!
I can tell you don't think life has its own meaning in its own right, I do.
.
05 Aug 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayYou aren't answering the question of why you think killing embryo's is wrong, you are just restating your position. Why do you think killing an embryo is wrong? Is it just an axiom of your moral compass that killing "innocent" human life is always wrong?
Life is either important or not, if it is than in all stages it is. The beginning of a life may not
be something you can see and hold, but without it, nothing else will develop. So unless
you want to invalidate a human life for cause, than let the causes begin to be named. We
have seen people belittled for color, nationality, age, and a number of other ...[text shortened]... ngs. Are
you an outsight out of mind guy, if you cannot see him or her, they are not important?
What is your view of Numbers 5:11 onward with respect to this issue?