04 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRape is the crime of forcing a woman to submit to sexual intercourse against her will.
here is the question that both FMF and Proper knob seem unable to bring themselves to answer, if consent has already been given to yield ones body to ones partner how can so called marital rape take place. If anyone has any thoughts on the matter please let me know , I would be happy to hear them.
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe issue is the victim's "will" at the time of sexual intercourse. If it is done against her will then it is rape and it is a moral atrocity.
If you cannot answer the question just say so, i will not ask it again, its there for anyone who wishes to attempt to answer it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMy dentist came around last night at 2am, forcibly took out a tooth.
here is the question that both FMF and Proper knob seem unable to bring themselves to answer objectively. If consent has already been given to yield ones body to ones partner how can so called 'marital rape', take place. If anyone has any thoughts on the matter please let me know , I would be happy to hear them.
When I objected he said "You were OK with it last time!"
Silly me for objecting.
Originally posted by wolfgang59We shall see if robbie can make a case that forcing of a woman to submit to sexual intercourse against her will can be 'morally sound' behaviour.
My dentist came around last night at 2am, forcibly took out a tooth.
When I objected he said "You were OK with it last time!"
Silly me for objecting.
Originally posted by wolfgang59have you given your dentist consent to come round and take your teeth out at anytime, no? then your analogy my friend is to distant to be of much use.
My dentist came around last night at 2am, forcibly took out a tooth.
When I objected he said "You were OK with it last time!"
Silly me for objecting.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSurely the term 'mutual consent' in your scripture has a bearing on whether a man can rape his wife or not?
dude why dont you simply answer the question, if consent has already been given to yield ones body to ones partner how can it be construed as marital rape - second time asking.
Surely there can also be no 'domestic violence' if a women has submitted her body during her wedding vows?
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf a husband has been beating his wife up in front of her children throughout the day and he then tries to have sexual intercourse with her against her will, would you consider it rape?
another stupid attempt to make the debate personal and will be ignored.
Originally posted by Proper KnobMutual consent is used in the context of withdrawing the so called, 'marital due', for a specific purpose. Nor can it be applied to so called 'marital rape', because if one partner is insistent on exrcising the so called , 'marital due', its not be mutual consent is it, sigh another EPIC FAIL! also it has no bearing on the issue that you seem unable to answer, that being that if consent has already been given how can it be construed as rape.
Surely the term 'mutual consent' in your scripture has a bearing on whether a man can rape his wife or not?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou appear to be justify sexual violence through the use of Bilbical scripture and you're terming what I type an EPIC FAIL?!
Mutual consent is used in the context of withdrawing the so called, 'marital due', for a specific purpose. Nor can it be applied to so called 'marital rape', because if one partner is insistent on exrcising the so called , 'marital due', its not be mutual consent is it, sigh another EPIC FAIL! also it has no bearing on the issue that you seem unable to answer, that being that if consent has already been given who can it be construed as rape.