16 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobof course it is, but you are an atheist and are not under the same guiding principles as
Gotta love this phrase - 'appropriate use of the genitals'!!!
Surely the appropriate use for my genitals is down to me and whichever consenting adults(s) i may be engaged with?
a Christian or rather have no regard for those principles although you retain the right
to exercise your conscience in like manner.
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMy heart goes out to your poor wife. Not only does she have to live with you day and and day out, she doesn't even have the pleasure of oral sex to ease her woes?!
yes because lets face it, lapping up seminal fluids and excretions from the genitalia is
like really soooooo appealing, doh! We should have another school beside the FMF
school for scoundrels, The stellspalfie 'muff diving', club!
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobShe loves me and is not degraded by having to engage in oral or anal sex.
My heart goes out to your poor wife. Not only does she have to live with you day and and day out, she doesn't even have the pleasure of oral sex to ease her woes?!
16 Dec 12
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper Knobyeah that will be shining bright, you deviants can podger about where you like, in
Deranged!!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
wholly unnatural places and then call those who refuse to share in your deviant
behaviour as deranged, clearly night is day and day is night. I think the practice itself
is unclean, what that says about the people who engage in it, i am not sure, depraved
is how I may describe them.
depraved - deviating from what is considered moral or right or proper or good;
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieApologies, in my haste i read degraded as deranged.
yeah that will be shining bright, you deviants can podger about where you like, in
wholly unnatural places and then call those who refuse to share in your deviant
behaviour as deranged, clearly night is day and day is night. I think the practice itself
is unclean, what that says about the people who engage in it, i am not sure, depraved
is h ...[text shortened]... describe them.
depraved - deviating from what is considered moral or right or proper or good;
Deviant, depraved?? Maybe you should try it, it might just loosen you up a bit.
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by Proper Knobok, i understand, loosen me up? you think i am highly strung? no way, I am calm and
Apologies, in my haste i read degraded as deranged.
Deviant, depraved?? Maybe you should try it, it might just loosen you up a bit.
capable of rational thought.
16 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobNo wonder the amount of skulduggery that passes for empirical evidence, I remain
Rob, you fly off the handle on this forum more than anyone else. You yourself admitted only last week you have a short temper.
calm and at peace at the moment and continue to herald the scientific method in my
endeavours to establish the legitimacy of scripture.
16 Dec 12
It seems pretty clear that robbie is wrapping a sexual inhibition up in pompous make-it-up-as-he-goes-along religiosity. Rank Outsider has completely unpicked robbie's arguments with regard to oral sex. On one level it's really funny, of course. But on another it is not.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieif its about consuming bodily fluids does that mean a woman can preform oral sex if the man is wearing a condom?
She loves me and is not degraded by having to engage in oral or anal sex.
does this also mean you cannot kiss with tongues, due to the exchange of phlegm and mouth bacteria?
16 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's a bit difficult to provide evidence to meet your standard.
So you have no evidence that anal sex should be considered an appropriate use of
the genitals and that despite the physiological evidence that its essentially unnatural
and the Biblical prohibition against it that it should be considered appropriate for
Christians, whether married or otherwise, whether male or female or that lapping up
seminal ...[text shortened]...
him or herself of. You on the other hand are free to provide any evidence to the
contrary.
For example, I quote directly from the Watchtower to demonstrate that JWs advocate the use of the death penalty for murder based on the precedent set by Mosaic Law. I even went to the JW website to get this information.
When I ask whether it would also be possible for a JW to advocate the death penalty for acts of homosexuality on the basis of the precedent set by Mosaic Law, you say JWs are not permitted to do so.
So I ask you why JWs feel justfied in advocating the death penalty for murder based on the precedent set by Mosaic Law, as there is an inherent contradiction in your position with what the Watchtower has said.
The quote from Watchtower is evidence of my point. You just ignore it, presumably because you don't know how to explain the Watchtower's position.
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by stellspalfiedude, you exercise your conscience ill exercise mine, in accordance with my Biblical
if its about consuming bodily fluids does that mean a woman can preform oral sex if the man is wearing a condom?
does this also mean you cannot kiss with tongues, due to the exchange of phlegm and mouth bacteria?
understanding.
16 Dec 12
2 edits
Originally posted by Rank outsiderI have already told you that i cannot explain my position with regard to the law and
It's a bit difficult to provide evidence to meet your standard.
For example, I quote directly from the Watchtower to demonstrate that JWs advocate the use of the death penalty for murder based on the precedent set by Mosaic Law. I even went to the JW website to get this information.
When I ask whether it would also be possible for a JW to advoca ...[text shortened]... u just ignore it, presumably because you don't know how to explain the Watchtower's position.
homosexuality as a capital punishment any better than i have already, three or four
times and far form ignoring it I attempted to address it on numerous occasions, my
word making no progress with you.
Your inability to subject my assertions to falsification with regard to anal sex and
oral sex and how it is perceived by the conscientious and discerning Christian is rather
telling. The matter is rather clear in my mind an I am thankful for the guidance.
16 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere did you learn such a dirty term? 😲
yes because lets face it, lapping up seminal fluids and excretions from the genitalia is
like really soooooo appealing, doh! We should have another school beside the FMF
school for scoundrels, The stellspalfie 'muff diving', club!