Spirituality
03 Dec 09
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by galveston75observe (oh i don't mean you galveston, don't worry you may go back in a corner)how none of the claims are actually proven or explained😀
“The Human Race: A Young Species?”
A recent series of genetic studies has revealed tantalizing hints of the origin of the human species. What‟s more, these new discoveries would seem to lend support to the ancient history of the human race as outlined by the Book of Genesis.
Thanks to these and earlier studies of human genetics, scientists now kn ...[text shortened]... anthropology/archaeology from Harvard. He is a staff member at Associates for Biblical Research.
"recent studies [...] would seem to lend support to p[...] genesis"
why? don't ask why heathens and heretics(i am a heretic, fabian is the heathen)
Thanks to these and earlier studies of human genetics, scientists now know that the human race had a single point of origin and then spread out from there.
why? didn't i tell you not to ask why?
a group of anthropologists and geneticists examined 3.9 million DNA sequences from 270 people belonging to four human populations around the globe. According to Gregory Cochran of the University of Utah, a member of the team, the study indicates that genetic variation among humans increased rapidly as they spread out from their point of origin and became agriculturalists
what exactly did they find? how does the study indicates the conclusion?
“We are a young species. Different human populations have not been separated for long enough periods of time to develop their own new alleles [different forms of the same genes]”
how young? young compared to what?
“Many geneticists therefore express doubt that genes have evolved very much in the relatively short span of human existence in all parts of the planet”
much compared to what? what would be "much"? and with what DNA do they compare it? what ancient fossil do they think is the oldest?
There is another fact to be gleaned from these new discoveries, one that lends plausibility to the Genesis scenario of a sudden choking off of almost the entire human species, to be followed by a worldwide expansion
there is also a scientific scenario of a choking point, though they don't blame it on the flood and it is slightly less impressive than 3 sons and their wives breeding like rabbits and living hundreds of years.
finding evidence for the alternative explanation in declining DNA sequence (haplotype) variation with increasing distance from Africa
what evidence?
this post is really awesome. i truly believe it is. though not for the same reason as the hypocrite thinks it's awesome. the same hypocrite who just the other day screamed like a spoiled little girl at karoly for daring to say she likes my posts and fabians more than his. the same hypocrite who now kisses the hole that resides between galveston's gluteus maximus[es]
it is awesome because it uses the big fancy words like DNA, University, "has shown", has proven", a study, Harvard. as such, the common fundamentalist simple person will eat it up like an apple pie(or something equally delicious). it is awesome in it's value as a propaganda tool. the common person will not notice that the article really doesn't answer anything, doesn't post reasons. the common fundamentalists will diagonalize the article and see the conclusion: The bible is true, yay and praise jesus!
Praise jesus you heathens(i am talking to you proper and fabian and ullr) and heretics (guilty). the galveston has proven genesis. there is no need to prove sodomah and gomorrah now, is there? or how the doodz in the genesis lived 900 years?
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by Proper Knobi think we will reach 500😀 and many more
I know i'm beginning to sound like a broken record, but you still are yet to produce any evidence with your claims about ice sore samples? And we're now nearly 500 posts in.
If you don't have any, it's ok to say so.
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by ZahlanziI'm a guy...
observe (oh i don't mean you galveston, don't worry you may go back in a corner)how none of the claims are actually proven or explained😀
"recent studies [...] would seem to lend support to p[...] genesis"
why? don't ask why heathens and heretics(i am a heretic, fabian is the heathen)
[b]Thanks to these and earlier studies of human genetics, scie ...[text shortened]... ah and gomorrah now, is there? or how the doodz in the genesis lived 900 years?
08 Dec 09
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75And I've answered you twice now about the ice caps
You said we could not have all come from the same parents or Naoh's sons. Yes we could have and there is proof that we can. Ignor it if you want.
And I've answered you twice now about the ice caps. Ignor the info I've given you if you want...........
Galvo, you haven't answered anything about the ice caps. You are still yet to produce any evidence to support your unsubstantiated view that the ice caps are only 5,000yrs old. Last night when i asked you, your reply was 'still working on it'. I can only conclude that after checking every website you could think of for three days, you found no evidence whatsoever to back up your claims. So now your claiming you've given me the evidence and i'm ignoring it. Maybe you could be so kind as to post the specific evidence that states the ice caps are 5,000yrs old again please.
You said we could not have all come from the same parents or Naoh's sons
We could've done, but we didn't. Maybe you could tell me how Noah managed to produce three sons each of a different race. And while you at it, could you show me the mitochondrial DNA evidence that shows how the entire human race descended from from these three races 5,000yrs ago. Robbie has yet to do it after numerous requests, maybe you'll have better luck!!
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by Proper Knoband i will tell you for a third time. my evidence is not based on DNA mapping, which has eloquently and brilliantly been addressed by Glalvo, but on sociological evidence, you do understand the difference, dear Noob?
I'll ask for the third time.
Do you have any DNA evidence to back up your new fangled theory, and how did Noah manage to produce three sons each of distinct race?
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by UllrLol, now where have i heard that before, oh yes, thats correct, it was the generation of Noahs day that got wiped out after Noah had tried to reach out to them for a period of over forty years, with the simple message, repent and have a healthy respect for the true God and you shall see life, take no note and well, the rest is history.
I say bring it on! I don't fear your god.
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by Proper KnobI've given you "2" links that answers both those questions. Did you not read them?
[b]And I've answered you twice now about the ice caps
Galvo, you haven't answered anything about the ice caps. You are still yet to produce any evidence to support your unsubstantiated view that the ice caps are only 5,000yrs old. Last night when i asked you, your reply was 'still working on it'. I can only conclude that after checking every websi ...[text shortened]... ago. Robbie has yet to do it after numerous requests, maybe you'll have better luck!![/b]
08 Dec 09
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobiewhich has eloquently and brilliantly been addressed by Glalvo
and i will tell you for a third time. my evidence is not based on DNA mapping, which has eloquently and brilliantly been addressed by Glalvo, but on sociological evidence, you do understand the difference, dear Noob?
Have i missed something? I've yet to see Galvo adress something 'eloquently and brilliantly' as you put it on this thread.
my evidence is not based on DNA mapping
I'll rephrase my question. Why does the scientific DNA evidence not support your theory?
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by Proper Knobwhy does the evolutionary hypothesis not support our theory, why indeed?
[b]which has eloquently and brilliantly been addressed by Glalvo
Have i missed something? I've yet to see Galvo adress something e'loquently and brilliantly' as you put it on this thread.
my evidence is not based on DNA mapping
I'll rephrase my question. Why does the DNA evidence not support your theory?[/b]
08 Dec 09
Originally posted by Proper Knobi gave my evidence, it is as Glavo has stated, as yet, unrefuted! The Bible lives, the teachings of Christ live, we are victorious!
That's because your theory is a load of unsubstantiated gobbledygook!!!!!
Which has no supporting evidence in the real world.