Noah's Ark?

Originally posted by galveston75
Why?

I'm interested in what you do because I wonder if you have to rely on any technology to make decisions as part of your job. What do you do for a living?

Originally posted by PBE6
I'm interested in what you do because I wonder if you have to rely on any technology to make decisions as part of your job. What do you do for a living?

What does technology have to do with evolution and not admiting there is a God?

Originally posted by galveston75
What does technology have to do with evolution and not admiting there is a God?

I'm just trying to understand your mindset. So, what do you do for a living?

Originally posted by PBE6
I'm just trying to understand your mindset. So, what do you do for a living?

So is ones work how you judge them?

Originally posted by galveston75
So is ones work how you judge them?

What do you do all day, kill puppies? Why don't you just answer the question?

Originally posted by PBE6
What do you do all day, kill puppies? Why don't you just answer the question?

First of all it's none of your business....

Originally posted by galveston75
First of all it's none of your business....

At least that's an answer. What's the second of all?

Originally posted by galveston75
I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating technics. The flood on the other hand is a fact if ones would only look at the proof ...[text shortened]... ry to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.

The flood on the other hand is a fact

Sorry to sound like a broken record again, but you haven't shown any facts yet.

You are still to produce any evidence as to why there isn't any flood evidence in ice core samples. If you believe the ice caps are only 5,000yrs old i'm still waiting to see some evidence, and we're now nearly 550 posts in.

Originally posted by PBE6
At least that's an answer. What's the second of all?

I think one day he said he works in a grocery.. packing shelves I think it was.
I dont know why he seems to think there is any shame in that. Its an honest living.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
[b]The flood on the other hand is a fact

Sorry to sound like a broken record again, but you haven't shown any facts yet.

You are still to produce any evidence as to why there isn't any flood evidence in ice core samples. If you believe the ice caps are only 5,000yrs old i'm still waiting to see some evidence, and we're now nearly 550 posts in.[/b]

This is my answer which I thought as very clear... And it's my final answer.

I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating technics. The flood on the other hand is a fact if ones would only look at the proof the earth presents in a different light. But that causes a problem for them to submit to that possibilty because then the reality of a God gets in their face. So they just keep on trying to defend this theory and try to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.

Originally posted by Rajk999
I think one day he said he works in a grocery.. packing shelves I think it was.
I dont know why he seems to think there is any shame in that. Its an honest living.

Stupid answer and not even close...

Originally posted by galveston75
This is my answer which I thought as very clear... And it's my final answer.

I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating tech ...[text shortened]... y to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.

Your answer is about as clear as the mud you can't find evidence for!! So i'll take that as a no.

Why not just say so?!

Originally posted by galveston75
Stupid answer and not even close...

No need to be ashamed. Its an honest living.
Christ does not judge anyone by their profession unless you are involved in something illegal, immoral or unethical. So just say what it is and lets move on.

Originally posted by Rajk999
No need to be ashamed. Its an honest living.
Christ does not judge anyone by their profession unless you are involved in something illegal, immoral or unethical. So just say what it is and lets move on.

Actually the only thing I'm ashamed of is you and your comments... But let's move on.

Originally posted by galveston75
Actually the only thing I'm ashamed of is you and your comments... But let's move on.

You sound like we are friends ... Please .. I dont know you well enough. Please back off.