@of-ants-and-imps saidIt IS the rule.
I would dispute this claim by saying while it may be true in exception it's not the rule.
Also, the OP could likewise be extrapolated to cover a wider 'transhuman' trend amongst progressive thinkers. For instance, the whole in vitro with egg and donor, which involved millions of babies (data from 2005), playing up the basic rights to life. This has been caution ...[text shortened]... e but obviously a hybrid of some sort, would introduce more hierarchic levels of human class beings.
And 'hybrid'?
What are you on about?
@of-ants-and-imps saidI get it. Conspiracy theories are seductive to some people who are already mistrustful.
@Suzianne
I forget what animal human combination it was but a few years ago they had a scientific breakthrough, outside of any regulatory boards, making a hybrid embryo. And didn't look cute, it was gross.
18 Nov 23
@of-ants-and-imps saidSubscribe and get some credibility.
@Suzianne
I forget what animal human combination it was but a few years ago they had a scientific breakthrough, outside of any regulatory boards, making a hybrid embryo. And didn't look cute, it was gross.
@divegeester saidRusty use to say things like that. Have you taken over the mantle?
Subscribe and get some credibility.
Do all non subscribers to you lack credibility? Or were you just speaking nonsense?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidRusty still does; he hasn’t changed from being the forum pariah whom you set up your club to ostracise.
Rusty use to say things like that.
You nasty piece of work.
@divegeester saidAs I thought, you were talking nonsense. There are a great many non subscribers here who have more credibility than you do.
Rusty still does; he hasn’t changed from being the forum pariah whom you set up your club to ostracise.
You nasty piece of work.
18 Nov 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo. What’s that got to do with you trying to ostracise very Rusty a few years ago?
As I thought, you were talking nonsense. There are a great many non subscribers here who have more credibility than you do.
@divegeester saidYawn.
So. What’s that got to do with you trying to ostracise very Rusty a few years ago?
Move on.
18 Nov 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidLol why…?
Yawn.
Move on.
You set up you club to ostracise Very Rusty you malicious a-hole.
@divegeester saidDidn't you join that club?
Lol why…?
You set up you club to ostracise Very Rusty you malicious a-hole.
Edit: Rusty too?
18 Nov 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo?
Didn't you join that club?
Edit: Rusty too?
Your intent is what’s in play here Ducky
@divegeester saidYou're grumbling about a club I created to exclude Rusty, to which Rusty is an active member?
So?
Your intent is what’s in play here Ducky
18 Nov 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’m pointing out that the reason you created that club is indicative of what type of person you are.
You're grumbling about a club I created to exclude Rusty, to which Rusty is an active member?
A-hole.