Only one option.....

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sigh, its nowhere near a scientific fact, there is no empirical scientific evidence which
demonstrates the transmutation of one species into another, none! Adaptation is not
mutation and never has been, yet the materialist would have us believe that they are
one and the same. That entities adapt is without question, that they adapt and
transom themselves into an entirely different organism is the stuff of pure fantasy.

That's your religious opinion, robbie, it's not a scientific fact.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sigh, its nowhere near a scientific fact, there is no empirical scientific evidence which
demonstrates the transmutation of one species into another, none! Adaptation is not
mutation and never has been, yet the materialist would have us believe that they are
one and the same. That entities adapt is without question, that they adapt and
transom themselves into an entirely different organism is the stuff of pure fantasy.

I knew you'd turn up.

Quick pointer, and one you always seem to negate, it's not only materialists who accept evolution Rob.

Now my question - why should anyone pay any attention to a man who has admitted on this very forum to being 'ignorant' and 'closed-minded' about the topic at hand?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Evolution is a fact Nicksten, it's a scientific fact as much as that the earth orbits the sun. It is backed up by 150 years of scientific discoveries using the scientific method from a whole host of scientific disciplines.

That you have never read a book on the subject does not surprise me, it's a theme which runs through every creationist who posts ...[text shortened]... epts the evidence for evolution, it's not as black and white as you're making it out to be.

I am reading more on what CalJust has given me - once I am done with this will I give my Christian opinion if I support it or not. But evolution is broader than you actually mean. Yes I do include the Big Bang, why, because it had to start somewhere, and it started with the Big Bang. Also, even though Abiogenesis is something on it's own, it still falls part within the process of evolution, cause life came from non-life(abiogenesis) and the soap became life and transformed into something else to be a better type of specie and the not so strong soap died (evolution - in a nutshell in my opinion).

This all leads hand in hand together - there is only different parts, but it all still fits together. I am reading more as I said, and to give you a clue, I don't like what I am reading...but lets see.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
That's your religious opinion, robbie, it's not a scientific fact.

it is both my religious opinion and a scientific fact!b How many mutations will it take to
convince you, a million, a billion, a zillion?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I knew you'd turn up.

Quick pointer, and one you always seem to negate, it's not only materialists who accept evolution Rob.

Now my question - why should anyone pay any attention to a man who has admitted on this very forum to being 'ignorant' and 'closed-minded' about the topic at hand?

have i not attempted to read Darwins book myself, have you? Noooo, i think therefore
that makes me adequately qualified, pony up the evidence PK or admit that there is
no empirical scientific evidence for transmutation. what other renegade theists think
is no credence for the ideology which they profess, they have denied the Christ and
his teachings and have supplanted it with materialistic dogma, they must be found and
punished!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
have i not attempted to read Darwins book myself, have you? Noooo, i think therefore
that makes me adequately qualified, pony up the evidence PK or admit that there is
no empirical scientific evidence for transmutation. what other renegade theists think
is no credence for the ideology which they profess, they have denied the Christ and
his teachings.

You admit to being 'ignorant' and 'closed-minded' about evolution, tell my why anyone should read what you have to say.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You admit to being 'ignorant' and 'closed-minded' about evolution, tell my why anyone should read what you have to say.

because i have read Darwins book, in part admittedly which is more than the
materialists have done, indeed, how can one express an opinion about a book which
one has not read? The empirical scientific evidence if you please! As i suspected,
empty handed! when you find some PK, let me know until then, ill keep reading
Darwins very own book! i suggest you do the same.

Originally posted by Nicksten
I am reading more on what CalJust has given me - once I am done with this will I give my Christian opinion if I support it or not. But evolution is broader than you actually mean. Yes I do include the Big Bang, why, because it had to start somewhere, and it started with the Big Bang. Also, even though Abiogenesis is something on it's own, it still falls par ...[text shortened]... reading more as I said, and to give you a clue, I don't like what I am reading...but lets see.

Okay, read and then get back to us.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
because i have read Darwins book, in part admittedly which is more than the
materialists have done, indeed, how can one express an opinion about a book which
one has not read? The empirical scientific evidence if you please! As i suspected,
empty handed! when you find some PK, let me know until then, ill keep reading
Darwins very own book! i suggest you do the same.

Zero interest in a what a self confessed 'ignorant', 'closed minded' person has to say on this topic.

Sorry Rob.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Zero interest in a what a self confessed 'ignorant', 'closed minded' person has to say on this topic.

Sorry Rob.

Who is the closed minded person? Huh? Huh? Huh? 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Who is the closed minded person? Huh? Huh? Huh? 😏

You are, you are, you are.
You and your buddy Dasa.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
because i have read Darwins book, in part admittedly which is more than the
materialists have done, indeed, how can one express an opinion about a book which
one has not read?

Although Darwins book is about evolution, it is rather old and out dated, and hardly the only source of information on the subject. There, I expressed an opinion on the book without even reading it.

The empirical scientific evidence if you please! As i suspected,
empty handed!
Nobody needs empirical scientific evidence because you don't even understand the words in your question. 'Species' is a man made word with a rather loose definition.

Tell us, do you think that dogs are descended from wolves?

Originally posted by RJHinds
Who is the closed minded person? Huh? Huh? Huh? 😏

Zero interest in what an engine user has to say Ron. Suffice to say, every new game you start i'll be sending your opponent the data that has been collected and letting them know the situation. Admin might not want to do anything about it, but i will. 🙂

Have a nice day. 😏

Originally posted by Nicksten
I am reading more on what CalJust has given me - once I am done with this will I give my Christian opinion if I support it or not.

This all leads hand in hand together - there is only different parts, but it all still fits together. I am reading more as I said, and to give you a clue, I don't like what I am reading...but lets see.

Hi Nicksten,

There is a lot of material to wade through.

If you like (here is a personal offer) I can scan some pages from Collins' book, especially the pages on the problems with ID, and send them to you by e-mail.

If you want me to do this, you can contact me on info@esco.org.za

In peace,

CJ

Originally posted by CalJust
[b]You notice how I have pointed out multiple times on this thread that 'supernatural' is illogical by definition by nobody has challenged that? 'Supernatural' is a word people use when they don't want to be questioned, when they want to be able to say "but it doesn't follow your logic" whenever someone points out a problem.

Hulloooooo! Notice the nam ...[text shortened]... CHESS Forum and said: you guys are all idiots, why don't you play checkers instead??[/b]

twhithead once did classify himself as an agnostic atheist ( rwingett's classification ) i.e.the person who thinks that God does not exist but does not KNOW that God does not exist. However in the next post he denied that and said that he was an Atheist i.e.not only he thinks that God does not exist but KNOWS that he does not exist.