11 Jul 10
Originally posted by amannionTo amannion
What a load of rubbish.
You've disproved evolution with nothing but trite pseudo religious crap.
Give me an alternative to evolution that doesn't include the words 'god','spiritual' or 'eternal' ...
You have obviously invested much time in your devotions to the evolution therory, in your attempt to disprove god, but you do so in vain, because disproving god is like me disproving the sun in the sky.
I look North South East and West, and all i can see is the handy work of god.
But because of your puffed up and envious nature, god will not allow you to recognize his hand in everything.
Evidence of god is two-fold
1. the existence of the cosmos, and everthing in it.
2. and god within every living thing, is a constant source of ones insight and spiritual understanding, and where seeing with the eyes is not necessary.
Open your eyes, open your mind and open your heart.
vishva
11 Jul 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuFor goodness sake, are you actually capable of listening and learning??
To amannion
You have obviously invested much time in your devotions to the evolution therory, in your attempt to disprove god, but you do so in vain, because disproving god is like me disproving the sun in the sky.
I look North South East and West, and all i can see is the handy work of god.
But because of your puffed up and envious nature, god w ...[text shortened]... with the eyes is not necessary.
Open your eyes, open your mind and open your heart.
vishva
For the umpteenth time, evolution does not disprove God. It makes no claim on that issue. There are countless Christians who accept evolutionary theory and believe in God. Some of them post in this forum, if you pull your head out of your own self absorbed arse and read what people write you might actually have picked up on that and as a result you wouldn't keep repeating the nonsense you do.
11 Jul 10
Originally posted by AThousandYoungTo AThousandYoung
When did the Big Bang happen? Or did it?
The big bang happened about 150 trillion yrs ago, but i dont accept it as a big bang, but a big creation, which is in conceivable to us all.
The scientists veiw it was a big bang, is as close as they will get to the truth of the fact, and personaly i dont have a problem with the poetic notion (big bang)
vishva
11 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuNot content with rewriting the book on evolutionary biology, paleontology, genetics, anthropology, molecualr biology, and archaeology (and probably more i can't think of), your now turning your 'axe of wisdom' to physics and astrophysics? Does your knowledge know no boundaries?
To AThousandYoung
The big bang happened about 150 trillion yrs ago, but i dont accept it as a big bang, but a big creation, which is in conceivable to us all.
The scientists veiw it was a big bang, is as close as they will get to the truth of the fact, and personaly i dont have a problem with the poetic notion (big bang)
vishva
For someone who wouldn't be drawn onto how long we, as a species, had been on this planet, you seem remarkably sure about when the Big Bang ocurred.
12 Jul 10
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobTo ProperKnob
Not content with rewriting the book on evolutionary biology, paleontology, genetics, anthropology, molecualr biology, and archaeology (and probably more i can't think of), your now turning your 'axe of wisdom' to physics and astrophysics? Does your knowledge know no boundaries?
For someone who wouldn't be drawn onto how long we, as a species, had been on this planet, you seem remarkably sure about when the Big Bang ocurred.
Mathematicians, say that the simple single ecoli cell, is so complex in its desighn and nature, that the probability of it existing accidently or randomly is zero, what to speak of everything else.
vishva
12 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuTo vishvahetu
To ProperKnob
Mathematicians, say that the simple single ecoli cell, is so complex in its desighn and nature, that the probability of it existing accidently or randomly is zero, what to speak of everything else.
vishva
Why do you hit reply and quote and still feel the need to specify the username of the person you are speaking to?
12 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuThe probability that you would be alive today as you are and have the mindset at the moment in time you posted that is practically zero.
To ProperKnob
Mathematicians, say that the simple single ecoli cell, is so complex in its desighn and nature, that the probability of it existing accidently or randomly is zero, what to speak of everything else.
vishva
Am I therefore to assume your words are a figment of my imagination??? 😕
12 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuWhich mathematicians?
To ProperKnob
Mathematicians, say that the simple single ecoli cell, is so complex in its desighn and nature, that the probability of it existing accidently or randomly is zero, what to speak of everything else.
vishva
How do they measure this complexity?
How is the probability of the existence or not of a living thing calculated?
And of course, the biggie, do you not understand that evolution by natural selection operates incrementally? You don't build an e coli randomly. Nor do you build a human, a chimpanzee, a stick insect, or a tree randomly. These things are built from earlier forms. And them from earlier forms. And so on and so on and so on ...
12 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetu150 trillion years ago?
To AThousandYoung
The big bang happened about 150 trillion yrs ago, but i dont accept it as a big bang, but a big creation, which is in conceivable to us all.
The scientists veiw it was a big bang, is as close as they will get to the truth of the fact, and personaly i dont have a problem with the poetic notion (big bang)
vishva
Our universe isn't anywhere near that old. If you're going to be specific, try to be a little more accurate and thoughtful. Otherwise you come across as an idiot.
Actually come to think of it ...
12 Jul 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuI invest as much time in my 'devotions' to evolution theory as I invest in my devotions to the theory of gravity.
To amannion
You have obviously invested much time in your devotions to the evolution therory, in your attempt to disprove god, but you do so in vain, because disproving god is like me disproving the sun in the sky.
I look North South East and West, and all i can see is the handy work of god.
But because of your puffed up and envious nature, god w ...[text shortened]... with the eyes is not necessary.
Open your eyes, open your mind and open your heart.
vishva
I wouldn't bother attempting to disprove god. How can I? That would like trying to disprove the existence of fairies or ghosts or vampires.
And people like you will claim that because I can see a tree out my window, then therefore god exists.
How do you argue with that nonsense?