Go back
So, You Don't Believe In Sasquatch

So, You Don't Believe In Sasquatch

Spirituality

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
29 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
The Bible itself, of course: exegesis (scholarly examination of internal consistency, style, vocabulary, etc.), the provenance of the various 'books' (scrolls, actually) of which it is composed, the surviving original fragments from the time of probable composition and documentation of the chain of custody of those fragments.

As well as references from non-Biblical sources ...[text shortened]... nonized by the Council of Nicea in the 4c. AD. Cf the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Nag Hamadi Library, etc.
Have you watched the lecture? These are spoken about in great detail.

moonbus
Ãœber-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
29 Apr 19

@KellyJay

"2+2=4" is an analytical truth (google that if you're not schooled in logic); "God exists" is not.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
29 Apr 19

@moonbus said
@KellyJay

"2+2=4" is an analytical truth (google that if you're not schooled in logic); "God exists" is not.
So you say.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
29 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ghost-of-a-duke said
@KellyJay

Okay, let's put 'the ultimate truth' in a dark room. We both stand outside of that room, due to our finite nature. We both might think we know what is inside the room, and can at least agree that whatever we 'think' or 'believe' resides inside will not in the slightest way affect what is actually in there. If the 'ultimate truth' is that the Christian God ...[text shortened]... ped inside the room, we simply do not have access to the numbers to declare boldly that our 2+2 = 4.
If you are told the truth and you say no, I know better, it most certainly is not that! From that point on are you responsible for your claims?

moonbus
Ãœber-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
29 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Have you watched the lecture? These are spoken about in great detail.
What lecture? Where's the link?

moonbus
Ãœber-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
29 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
So you say.
Suppose God appeared to you, and you were in absolutely no doubt that it was really God Himself, and he said, "You know, Kelly, I'm really going to forgive the atheists, they just don't know it yet." In other words, no lake of fire, no eternal torture for non-belief. Could you still give me a compelling reason to believe what you believe? And don't say, "because it's the truth" -- that's begging the question.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
29 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
What lecture? Where's the link?
Page 1 is the Bible trust worthy, I thought I shared that earlier but either way if you watch her I think you will get something out of it. One way or another. 😉

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
29 Apr 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
Suppose God appeared to you, and you were in absolutely no doubt that it was really God Himself, and he said, "You know, Kelly, I'm really going to forgive the atheists, they just don't know it yet." In other words, no lake of fire, no eternal torture for non-belief. Could you still give me a compelling reason to believe what you believe? And don't say, "because it's the truth" -- that's begging the question.
I would reject whatever it was that appeared pretending to be God. God is good and truth so He can contradict Himself. Which is why I believe everything He does is both logical and reasonable.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
29 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
I would reject whatever it was that appeared pretending to be God. God is good and truth so He can contradict Himself. With is why I believe everything He does is both logical and reasonable.
Do you accept that this post of yours is founded on your subectivity and personal opinions about "God" and not on objectivity?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
29 Apr 19

@fmf said
Do you accept that this post of yours is founded on your subectivity and personal opinions about "God" and not on objectivity?
If it turns out that his post was true would you then accept its objectivity?

moonbus
Ãœber-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
29 Apr 19
2 edits

@kellyjay said
I would reject whatever it was that appeared pretending to be God. God is good and truth so He can contradict Himself. Which is why I believe everything He does is both logical and reasonable.
I suppose Abraham had a moment of doubt when what appeared to him to be God told him to slit his son's throat. Nonetheless, he overcame his doubt and submitted to what must have seemed to him to be an abomination, and he took his son out fully intending to slit his throat. And now you're saying you would not accept God appearing to you? You would reject an epiphany in preference to what?

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
29 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
I suppose Abraham had a moment of doubt when what appeared to him to be God told him to slit his son's throat. Nonetheless, he overcame his doubt and submitted to what must have seemed to him to be an abomination, and he took his son out fully intending to slit his throat. And now you're saying you would not accept God appearing to you? You would reject an epiphany in preference to what?
I think you have failed to understand the meaning of the event you are referencing concerning Abraham.

Galatians 3:8
And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.

God showed Abraham something when He(God)told him(Abraham) to kill his son Isaac. Abraham raised the knife to kill Isaac in obedience to his God knowing God would and could save Isaac.

It was an object lesson concerning the gospel, which is God sacrificing His own Son to save the world of lost sinners.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
29 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
If you are told the truth and you say no, I know better, it most certainly is not that! From that point on are you responsible for your claims?
I genuinely do not understand that sentence or how it addresses my dark room analogy.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
29 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
I would reject whatever it was that appeared pretending to be God. God is good and truth so He can contradict Himself. Which is why I believe everything He does is both logical and reasonable.
How do you know God can not contradict Himself? Who are you to judge Him if He does so, bearing in mind your inferior (compared to God) understanding of both 'good' and 'truth.' Perhaps divine logic and reason sometimes requires contradiction?

moonbus
Ãœber-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
29 Apr 19
1 edit

@secondson said
I think you have failed to understand the meaning of the event you are referencing concerning Abraham.

Galatians 3:8
And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.

God showed Abraham something when He(God)told him(Abraham) to kill his son Isaac. Abr ...[text shortened]... esson concerning the gospel, which is God sacrificing His own Son to save the world of lost sinners.
I think KJ failed to read my supposition, that he would not doubt that it was really God who appeared to him and told him something incredible.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.