Somebody help me...

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sorry i forgot its all about you, my bad.

How so? You asked... "If i convert to FMF'ism..." I responded.

Originally posted by FMF
The context is you, your estimation of what the "truth" is, and your posting record here at RHP. That's the context.

no the context was a statement made to Caljust. That is the actual context. Why are you trying to take it out of context.

Originally posted by FMF
How so? You asked... "If i convert to FMF'ism..." I responded.

so FMF'ism isn't all about you? Ok who is it about?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sorry i fail to see where you tell us why you have or are attempting to take the statement out of context. So why are you?

So, away from the context of CalJust's post, you would deny that your statement " I have not stated nor given the impression that my truths are any more truthful than anyone elses" had any validity. It does not apply to you generally it only applies to your response to CalJust's post, is that right?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so FMF'ism isn't all about you? Ok who is it about?

You brought up the word "FMF'ism" not me. I do not claim to have an "FMF'ism". It's your word. It's up to you to define it.

Originally posted by FMF
So, away from the context of CalJust's post, you would deny that your statement " I have not stated nor given the impression that my truths are any more truthful than anyone elses" had any validity. It does not apply to you generally it only applies to your response to CalJust's post, is that right?

sorry the statement i have not given the impression that my truths are more truthful than others was made within the context of caljusts statement, why you seek to take it out of context is known only to you.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sorry the statement i have not given the impression that my truths are more truthful than others was made within the context of caljusts statement, why you seek to take it out of context is known only to you.

I have already answered this.

Originally posted by FMF
You brought up the word "FMF'ism" not me. I do not claim to have an "FMF'ism". It's your word. It's up to you to define it.

I am not a religionist like you and your off-the-shelf pre-packaged religionist dogma! FMF'ism.

Originally posted by FMF
I have already answered this.

you have answered why you seek to take it out of context? where i cannot find it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am not a religionist like you and your off-the-shelf pre-packaged religionist dogma! FMF'ism.

This isn't an "-sim". It's a statement about myself.

Originally posted by FMF
This isn't an "-sim". It's a statement about myself.

but these are values you hold and thus constitute an integral part of FMF'ism

I am not a religionist like you with your off-the-shelf pre-packaged religionist dogma!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have answered why you seek to take it out of context? where i cannot find it.

I did not think I was taking it out of context but then when you said that you thought I had, I put that aside, and I reframed it as follows: The context is you, your estimation of what the "truth" is, and your posting record here at RHP. That's the context.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
but these are values you hold and thus constitute an integral part of FMF'ism

I am not a religionist like you with your off-the-shelf pre-packaged religionist dogma!

Just a description of myself and not "A belief (or system of beliefs) accepted as authoritative by some group or school". [The Sage]

Originally posted by FMF
I did not think I was taking it out of context but then when you said that you thought I had, I put that aside, and I reframed it as follows: The context is you, your estimation of what the "truth" is, and your posting record here at RHP. That's the context.

you re-framed it? trying to frame Robbie? How insidious.

Look dude I might be the megalomaniac boy king of all spiritualdom, harbinger of all sacred truths and defender of the faith, his most illustrious Holy eminence, Pontifex Maximus and those truths may be more truthful than others and maybe I have given the impression that they are more truthful than others, usually with evidence for the veracity of the claim but its not evident in the statement that i made to Caljust, truths are truths.

If you want to frame it in whatever guise you see fit, then frame it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you re-framed it? trying to frame Robbie? How insidious.

I was re-framing the question in an effort to get you to answer a straight forward question about your track record as to what you see as being "true" and your attitude to what others see as being "true".