subjective science

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
So that's a "no" to my question, then? Can you identify some of these assumptions, and show why they are wrong?

Try to read with your eyes open:

Uniformatarianism is an unprovable assumption that cannot be verified using the scientific method no matter how you try to spin it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformitarianism

If you cannot prove it it is a matter of faith.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
As expected, those 'big words' weren't even yours. - Posted without any initial link to wikipedia. (Not for the first time).

If you have any evidence to suggest the words are false feel free to share it.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If you have any evidence to suggest the words are false feel free to share it.

Is not that they are false, it is that you plagiarised them and used them as your own.

(Although I see you have now scurried back and edited the post in question).

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Try to read with your eyes open:

Uniformatarianism is an unprovable assumption that cannot be verified using the scientific method no matter how you try to spin it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformitarianism

If you cannot prove it it is a matter of faith.

In that sense you are no different to a theist.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Is not that they are false, it is that you plagiarised them and used them as your own.

(Although I see you have now scurried back and edited the post in question).

So just sour grapes then that the entire fossil record is based upon an unprovable assumption that cannot be verified using the scientific method?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
So just sour grapes then that the entire fossil record is based upon an unprovable assumption that cannot be verified using the scientific method?

So, no denial of your deliberate plagiarism.

Originally posted by @kellyjay
Really according to you!? Maybe i felt it was!

Of course you did. We gotta have standards though.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
So, no denial of your deliberate plagiarism.

I posted the link in the very next post. Sour grapes it is?

Originally posted by @apathist
Of course you did. We gotta have standards though.

We gotta have your standards?

Originally posted by @apathist
Of course you did. We gotta have standards though.

You are the standard?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I posted the link in the very next post. Sour grapes it is?

Why not the same post? And why only after your plagiarism was pointed out?

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Why not the same post? And why only after your plagiarism was pointed out?

I posted the link at 19:32 you claimed I plagiarised at 19:36. Since it was an oversight in the first post I went back and added the link. So are you going to keep on pouting or do you have real objection to the contents of the link?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I posted the link at 19:32 you claimed I plagiarised at 19:36. Since it was an oversight in the first post I went back and added the link. So are you going to keep on pouting or do you have real objection to the contents of the link?

Was it also an oversight when you deliberately mislead people as to your identity,when you switched accounts?

Seems you have a habit of excusing your deliberate acts as oversights.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Was it also an oversight when you deliberately mislead people as to your identity,when you switched accounts?

Seems you have a habit of excusing your deliberate acts as oversights.

When you've lost the argument you attack the person posing the argument. Oldest trick in the book.

😴

Originally posted by @dj2becker
When you've lost the argument you attack the person posing the argument. Oldest trick in the book.

😴

I believe the oldest trick in the book is deflecting with an emoticon.