@sonship saidI think we should just do variations on this template. 😉
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Let me guess.
A baby coming into the world is also by default a Vegan, an Existentialist, a Post Modernist, a Pragmatist, a fan of Madalyn Murray O'Hair, and loyal customer of Facebook too.
@Kevin-Eleven
Hey, you can hardly deny that there are a lot of baby pictures on Facebook.
Right out of their mother's womb their default customers.
@sonship saidI only have about 20 connections on FB, so I don't see that many baby pics.
@Kevin-Eleven
Hey, you can hardly deny that there are a lot of baby pictures on Facebook.
Right out of their mother's womb their default customers.
But I do feel uneasy about people posting photos of their kids on FB with the "public" setting, especially if the kids are good-looking.
(If the kids are ugly, I'm not so concerned. -- joke!)
22 Nov 21
@sonship saidDo you see Facebook as evil?
@Kevin-Eleven
Hey, you can hardly deny that there are a lot of baby pictures on Facebook.
Right out of their mother's womb their default customers.
@sonship saidIs this going to be your stock reply now?You seem upset.
You did this about year ago, you riffed on with the same reply to several of my posts before imploding in a hissy fit and disappearing for a few months.
@sonship saidI’m wondering if you consider Facebook as a platform to be inherently evil?
@Kevin-Eleven
Hey, you can hardly deny that there are a lot of baby pictures on Facebook.
Right out of their mother's womb their default customers.
@divegeester saidAre you suggesting inanimate objects can be evil? That’s an interesting hypothesis if you are. If you’re not, then I think perhaps evil is not the right word (maybe malicious is a better word?)
I’m wondering if you consider Facebook as a platform to be inherently evil?
I will await clarification on whether you think inanimate objects can be evil before commenting further.