The Neck of the Giraffe

@dj2becker said
Time to take your meds.

I'll take my meds if you answer the question.

@wolfgang59 said
I'll take my meds if you answer the question.

I never made any such claim.

@dj2becker said
I never made any such claim.

You did not.
Answer the question.

@wolfgang59 said
You did not.
Answer the question.

There is no evidence to suggest that Jesus had 3 legs, if you have any feel free to share it.

@dj2becker said
There is no evidence to suggest that Jesus had 3 legs, if you have any feel free to share it.

I'm not saying that.
I'm asking you for the evidence.

@wolfgang59 said
I'm not saying that.
I'm asking you for the evidence.

I'm not interested in your red herring.

@dj2becker said
I'm not interested in your red herring.

If you can't answer the question just say so.

Now ... back to giraffes.

@wolfgang59 said
If you can't answer the question just say so.

Now ... back to giraffes.

As I said before, I'm not interested in your red herring.

@wolfgang59 said
Did you see me say it?

It was implied in one of your questions.
Review what you have written.

I thought I was helping you by answering your questions
but it seems your quest for knowledge was not sincere.

My point you are looking for the meaning of my words instead of actually looking
at what I say. Review what I have written. For crying out loud no wonder you don't
grasp my complaint.

@kellyjay said
Describe what my complaints are and why I have them?

No. In your own words explain the underlying concepts of natural selection. You claimed to understand natural selection. If that's the case, then you should have no problem explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words.

@wolfgang59 said
Did you see me say it?

It was implied in one of your questions.
Review what you have written.

I thought I was helping you by answering your questions
but it seems your quest for knowledge was not sincere.

I worked in a R&D lab for 20 years, handing off instructions to do work was all I
did, the reason I'm complaining about is due to all I have glean over the years
working on CPU processors. Things just don't happen! Building a lifeform is much
more complex than a CPU. I'm being sincere, you are being, well the words that
come to mind are not flattering.

@thinkofone said
No. In your own words explain the underlying concepts of natural selection. You claimed to understand natural selection. If that's the case, then you should have no problem explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words.

Oh please, you have been asked a single question here by nearly everyone that
comes to this chess site that posts here, and you refuse to answer and you are
telling me what I must do?

@kellyjay said
Oh please, you have been asked a single question here by nearly everyone that
comes to this chess site that posts here, and you refuse to answer and you are
telling me what I must do?

You keep claiming to understand natural selection. You can easily demonstrate that you do by explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words. The topic of the discussion is natural selection. This is right on topic.

If KN or WG asks you to back up your claim by explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words, what intellectually dishonest excuse are you going to make up to refuse them?

@thinkofone said
You keep claiming to understand natural selection. You can easily demonstrate that you do by explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words.

If KN or WG asks you to back up your claim by explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words, what intellectually dishonest excuse are you going to make up to refuse them?

Explain in your own words the underlying concepts of natural selection that Kelly supposedly doesn't understand.

@thinkofone said
You keep claiming to understand natural selection. You can easily demonstrate that you do by explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words. The topic of the discussion is natural selection. This is right on topic.

If KN or WG asks you to back up your claim by explaining the underlying concepts of natural selection in your own words, what intellectually dishonest excuse are you going to make up to refuse them?

You keep talking about Jesus that hasn't forced you into answering questions put
to you. If you are going to suggest I must pass a test to comment please before you
open you mouth about Jesus Christ answer that which has been asked to you by
almost everyone here! If there is a point of contention where what I have said does
not line up with natural selection highlight it, because as I have said, I don't agree
with many of the things it is given credit for in the whole process of life, because
it is just a piece of the puzzle not the whole ball of wax.