02 Jan 20
@indonesia-phil saidThe only question remaining, therefore, is whether or not one believes in cod.
That which we must conclude from this clear and unambiguous writing is quite clear; god is a fish.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
02 Jan 20
1 edit
@indonesia-phil saidNo sir.
The only question remaining, therefore, is whether or not one believes in cod.
In the great scheme of things, I know my plaice.
😴
02 Jan 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAm I herring you right?
No sir.
In the great scheme of things, I know my plaice.
😴
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
03 Jan 20
@indonesia-phil saidSorry sir, speak later.
Am I herring you right?
I have a bit of a haddock. (Does that work? )
03 Jan 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt's terrible, but the worse the better, so yeah, works for me. Perhaps we should not so denigrate Christ, flounder of the Christian church.
Sorry sir, speak later.
I have a bit of a haddock. (Does that work? )
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
12 Jan 20
3 edits
Here we have an excerpt from Witness Lee's commentary on the story of Jesus feeding the crowd of 5,000 with the fish and 5 loaves (Matthew 14:14-21)
"...these five loaves were barley loaves. Barley is a type of the resurrected Christ (Leviticus 23:10). Thus, the barley loaves signify Christ in resurrection as food to us. Loaves are of the vegetable life, signifying the generating aspect of Christ's life, whereas fish are of the animal life, signifying the redeeming aspect of Christ's life."
(The Recovery Version: Footnotes of Matthew).
Here is a poster that likes to splice out JUST ENOUGH of someone's teaching to make them look foolish. Now if MORE words related to the subject are cut and pasted by someone else, then he puts on the critical hat
- "You're spamming the Forum, cutting and pasting too much."
Really convenient.
Like - "I cut a little to make someone look like a fool.
You include more explanation and expand, and that's breaking the spamming rules of the Forum."
Nicely maneuvered, huh?
