26 Dec 16
Originally posted by apathistWould a retarded person ever be a competent parent?
If we require parents to be competent then eugenics will occur? I don't see how you connect those dots, but it is a slippery-slope argument, known to be fallacious. To see this, sub cars for babies: if we require drivers to be competent, then what no is the horrible consequence?
26 Dec 16
1 edit
Originally posted by apathistA car is a privilege that can be revoked, you believe having a baby should be thought of
Cars and babies, Kelly. The needs of the community outweighs individual desire and behavior, especially when such selfish behavior is based on religious tenets. And your religion is the source of your disagreement here, is it not.
as privilege that can be revoked as well? I think you are missing how important this is if
the government can now say who can have kids, I take it your not pro-choice, and you
are not even pro-life, instead you are some government power tyrant who thinks your
views on who is worthy is all that is required, not the desire of the people.