12 Mar 18
Originally posted by @rajk999Asking this, you obviously discount pretty much everything Paul taught as well as the commentary from the gospels on the issue.
Whats the matter now Whodey?
All along you are answering within 2 or 3 minutes and as soon as I ask about where Jesus makes these statements you disappear ... only to reappear in a few days and make the same stupid statements, in another thread ... pathetic.
Do you also discount Isaiah 53?
He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before its shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth.
8
By oppression[a] and judgment he was taken away.
Yet who of his generation protested?
For he was cut off from the land of the living;
for the transgression of my people he was punished.[b]
9
He was assigned a grave with the wicked,
and with the rich in his death,
though he had done no violence,
nor was any deceit in his mouth.
10
Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer,
and though the Lord makes[c] his life an offering for sin,
he will see his offspring and prolong his days,
and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.
11
After he has suffered,
he will see the light of life[d] and be satisfied[e];
by his knowledge[f] my righteous servant will justify many,
and he will bear their iniquities.
12
Therefore I will give him a portion among the great,[g]
and he will divide the spoils with the strong,[h]
because he poured out his life unto death,
and was numbered with the transgressors.
For he bore the sin of many,
and made intercession for the transgressors
Christ said to look to the prophets that wrote about him.
Originally posted by @fmfThis is irrelevant if you did not read my post on p. 1.
Did sonship talk about the "worship" of Satan or did he talk about people coming under the influence of Satan or being unknowingly tricked by Satan or some such? He's talking about "worship of Satan" I think.
13 Mar 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeNo, that distinction isn't so relevant because any sort of rational egoism and inversion of the good is worship of Satan whether it is done by name to Satan or not.
Apologies, missed this post by you, among all of Roman's trolling. (In the same way I once missed an important training email in my in-box due to all the spam about claiming for car accident injuries or buying fake passports).
Do you not think sonship's use of the term Satan 'worship' is key here? Had he said 'atheism is a temporary stop on the w ...[text shortened]... ld anyone not taking literally his statement that atheism was a journey towards 'Satan worship?'
Originally posted by @whodeyWhat did Jesus say?
Asking this, you obviously discount pretty much everything Paul taught as well as the commentary from the gospels on the issue.
Do you also discount Isaiah 53?
He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before its shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mou ...[text shortened]... ntercession for the transgressors
Christ said to look to the prophets that wrote about him.
Nothing!!
If you would like to learn something new instead of regurgitating the same old doctrine.... let me know
13 Mar 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaPerhaps you missed sonship's 'clarification' in this thread? (Though personally think he just dug a deeper hole for himself). He wrote:
No, that distinction isn't so relevant because any sort of rational egoism and inversion of the good is worship of Satan whether it is done by name to Satan or not.
"I meant more that world history for anti-theists / atheist unbelief climaxes in an arrival to the worship of Antichrist and Satan who gives him his great authority."
Originally posted by @whodeyIt is critical for proper understanding of the scriptures, and to know how one can get eternal life in the Kingdom of God, to place all these teachings in order and in some kind of priority.
Asking this, you obviously discount pretty much everything Paul taught as well as the commentary from the gospels on the issue.
Do you also discount Isaiah 53?
He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before its shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mou ...[text shortened]... ntercession for the transgressors
Christ said to look to the prophets that wrote about him.
Jesus said to look to the prophets to gain a greater understanding, but it is the words of Jesus that gives eternal life. It is not the words of Isaiah or David that gives eternal life. The teachings of Jesus comes first. Everyone else is last.
SO if you learn to place all these teachings in some kind of priority then your doctrine would not be so convoluted and so wrong.
Jesus said nothing about his death and resurrection and understanding this as a prerequisite for eternal life. That is the truth. There are many other things that Jesus said that is necessary for eternal life. These are the things to focus on.
Originally posted by @rajk999Jesus said to believe on Him for eternal life and demonstrated numerous times that faith made someone whole and that belief was all that was needed for God’s power to be shown through miracles.
It is critical for proper understanding of the scriptures, and to know how one can get eternal life in the Kingdom of God, to place all these teachings in order and in some kind of priority.
Jesus said to look to the prophets to gain a greater understanding, but it is the words of Jesus that gives eternal life. It is not the words of Isaiah or David that ...[text shortened]... her things that Jesus said that is necessary for eternal life. These are the things to focus on.
Originally posted by @romans1009Good for you .. bear in mind your doctrine constitutes mouthworship.
Jesus said to believe on Him for eternal life and demonstrated numerous times that faith made someone whole and that belief was all that was needed for God’s power to be shown through miracles.
Originally posted by @rajk999No it doesn’t.
Good for you .. bear in mind your doctrine constitutes mouthworship.
An aversion to sin and good works follow an acceptance of Christ and the indwelling of God’s Holy Spirit.
You continually try to separate good works from belief in and acceptance of Christ. Why is that?
Originally posted by @romans1009Because they are in fact two separate things.
No it doesn’t.
An aversion to sin and good works follow an acceptance of Christ and the indwelling of God’s Holy Spirit.
You continually try to separate good works from belief in and acceptance of Christ. Why is that?
Faith without works is dead.
There is faith with works which is alive
There is faith without works which is dead.
Therefore there are some who accept Christ and do no good works
There are some who accept Christ and they do good works.
13 Mar 18
Originally posted by @rajk999Anyone whose heart is not changed by accepting Christ did not genuinely and sincerely accept Him because God’s Holy Spirit did not indwell him or her. Why is that so hard to understand? Or do you discount or diminish the power of God’s Holy Spirit to change the heart, and consequently heart and life, of a believer?
Because they are in fact two separate things.
Faith without works is dead.
There is faith with works which is alive
There is faith without works which is dead.
Therefore there are some who accept Christ and do no good works
There are some who accept Christ and they do good works.
13 Mar 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Its not hard to understand what you say.
Anyone whose heart is not changed by accepting Christ did not genuinely and sincerely accept Him because God’s Holy Spirit did not indwell him or her. Why is that so hard to understand? Or do you discount or diminish the power of God’s Holy Spirit to change the heart, and consequently heart and life, of a believer?
The problem is what you say is not in the Bible.
13 Mar 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Jesus and all the Apostles wrote clearly about faith without works.
It is indeed in the Bible. It’s throughout the Bible.
But since you mock people who read the Bible, I’m not surprised you don’t know this.
Its not a foregone conclusion that someone with faith will automatically have works.
They are two separate things.
Some have faith alone
Some have works alone
Some have faith and works
Jesus will judge.
Originally posted by @rajk999Repeatedly posting false statements and false doctrines don’t make them true, kiddo.
Jesus and all the Apostles wrote clearly about faith without works.
Its not a foregone conclusion that someone with faith will automatically have works.
They are two separate things.
Some have faith alone
Some have works alone
Some have faith and works
Jesus will judge.