Originally posted by DeepThoughtLet me help catch you up... sometimes the narrative can take some strange twists and turns when 'debating' the diabolical duo.
The Terms of Service include a provision that registered members shall not be under the age of 13. Further, pretending to be something one is not on a website is no particular problem. What are you trying to insinuate?
FMF brought up something robbie said to him about a week ago, and it was something robbie has already apologized for saying. Apparently FMF thinks it's appropriate to bring up past grievances that have nothing to do with the topic because...
...
Originally posted by lemon limeFor some reason robbie feels able to repeat his insinuations about how children on this site are in some kind of danger from me when only a week ago he made a 'sincere' apology for using this kind of banter. See Thread 166701 page 271. His apology meant nothing, obviously.
FMF brought up something robbie said to him about a week ago, and it was something robbie has already apologized for saying. Apparently FMF thinks it's appropriate to bring up past grievances that have nothing to do with the topic because...
...
Originally posted by FMFIt obviously meant nothing to you, seeing as how you are willing to bring it up a week later here, on this forum at this thread.
For some reason robbie feels able to repeat his insinuations about how children on this site are in some kind of danger from me when only a week ago he made a 'sincere' apology for using this kind of banter. See Thread 166701 page 271. His apology meant nothing, obviously.
Originally posted by lemon limerobbie's "I just want to make fun of people" style includes stuff like insinuating an 'opponent' is a pedophile.
It obviously meant nothing to you, seeing as how you are willing to bring it up a week later here, on this forum at this thread.
Here on this thread he is in "I just want to make fun of people" mode again this time going on about divegeester being "an enemy of God"; not so long ago he was accusing him of having the same morality as a murderer.
robbie has apologized for this kind of "banter" but his apology was worthless.
If either you, lemon lime (or whoever you are in real life), or robbie carrobie, think that are valid real life suspicions about whether I can be trusted with the web site's children, then report your concerns and present your evidence to the owner (Russ) or his moderators immediately.
Originally posted by FMFThis is not the first time you clowns have tried using someones apology against them, and I'm sure it won't be the last.
robbie's "I just want to make fun of people" style includes stuff like insinuating an 'opponent' is a pedophile.
Here on this thread he is in "I just want to make fun of people" mode again this time going on about divegeester being "an enemy of God"; not so long ago he was accusing him of having the same morality as a murderer.
robbie has apologized for ...[text shortened]... eport your concerns and present your evidence to the owner (Russ) or his moderators immediately.
Originally posted by lemon limeIf you are choosing to take robbie's apology in good faith, even now - only a week later - after he has proved that it was completely worthless and insincere, then that is your prerogative. If you think that his insinuations ~ which he is now repeating, despite supposedly admitting that they were not appropriate ~ have any credibility, you should alert the web site without delay. Child Protection is a serious issue.
This is not the first time you clowns have tried using someones apology against them, and I'm sure it won't be the last.
Originally posted by FMFWhy the desperate attempt to change the subject? And why is dive going along with it after admonishing us to stay on topic?
If you are choosing to take robbie's apology in good faith, even now - only a week later - after he has proved that it was completely worthless and insincere, then that is your prerogative. If you think that his insinuations ~ which he is now repeating, despite supposedly admitting that they were not appropriate ~ have any credibility, you should alert the web site without delay. Child Protection is a serious issue.
page 27
Originally posted by divegeester
Now you are just being silly. If you can't address the topic without dodging like this then why bother.
Originally posted by lemon lime
The topic is Using the Bible to insult people... and you've done a bang up job of doing just that.
Originally posted by lemon limeIt wasn't a change of subject. Why is robbie going on and on about divegeester being "an enemy of God"? I think it's animosity-driven banter just like the stuff insinuating that I could not be trusted around children. The subject is: is Using the Bible to insult people OK? The sub-topic is: why is robbie going on and on about another Christian demonstrating 'enmity against God' after josephw's intervention in that General Forum chatter with James 4:4? I think it's just forum banter ~ like the pedophile thing. I don't think it's robbie speaking sincerely in his self-declared role as a 'Minister of God'.
Why the desperate attempt to change the subject? And why is dive going along with it [b]after admonishing us to stay on topic?[/b]
Originally posted by lemon limeIf you have paid close attention to robbie's concerns about me being around children ~ both before and since 'the apology' ~ and you think they have some merit, alert the web site. Here's a principle: protecting children is far too serious a matter to be the subject of toxic banter on a message board.
It's the principle or standard of paying close attention to what is being said.
If you have paid close attention to what robbie has been insinuating and you think he is out of order, the principled thing to do would be to come out and say so.