357d
@happy-chappy saidAnd what proof can you bring for that assumption?
This thread is misleading.
The flood didn't wipe out all mankind except the 8 on the ark.
357d
@carnivorum saidWrong. Very few "scientists" thought that the earth was flat. It is easily proven not flat by scientific observation that even ancient man had access to. And since science is the only discipline that requires evidence, I'd say, yes, we should take it seriously.
Well, we shouldn't take the so called "science" too seriously.
After all, it wasn't that long ago that all the scientist said that the earth was flat.
Why do you keep coming back?
357d
@carnivorum saidGreat flood ,6000 years. Aboriginal culture,60.000 years+.
And what proof can you bring for that assumption?
Please explain.
356d
@happy-chappy saidIt's simple: The Aboriginal culture is not 60,000+ years.
Great flood ,6000 years. Aboriginal culture,60.000 years+.
Please explain.
Just like the dino's are not laying underground for 200 million years.
That is already disproved by the fact that in half of all the dino carcasses original soft tissue is found.
In the first one they found soft tissue, a T-rex in 2005, they found pieces of elastic tendon, and supple bloodvessels, with in them hemoglobin.
Believing that that was laying undergrond for 200 million years is absurd.
And there is of course also the fact that every dino bone tests positive for C14, which is impossible when they are older than 100.000 years.
They all test within 20,000 and 40,000 years, which is a totally normal range for C14 testing.
So all these absurdly long time lines are out the window.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121961
@carnivorum saidSo how do you know about Dino eggs on the ark then?
Well, I don't know the exact time of them going extinct, I wasn't around then, but I would say about a 1000 to 2000 years ago.
356d
@divegeester saidWell, that is not really knowing, it's a combination of speculation and common sense.
So how do you know about Dino eggs on the ark then?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121961
@carnivorum saidIt’s “common sense” that there were dinosaur eggs on Noah’s ark and that they because extinct (as you said) in the last 1,000 to 2,000 years?
Well, that is not really knowing, it's a combination of speculation and common sense.
355d
@divegeester saidI didn't say there were dino eggs on the ark, I said there were small dinos fresh out of the eggs on the ark.
It’s “common sense” that there were dinosaur eggs on Noah’s ark and that they because extinct (as you said) in the last 1,000 to 2,000 years?
And there are a lot of indications that man and dinos have been living together.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29893
@carnivorum saidCrikey.
I didn't say there were dino eggs on the ark, I said there were small dinos fresh out of the eggs on the ark.
And there are a lot of indications that man and dinos have been living together.
Can I sell you a bridge?
Edit: Humans were certainly around when creatures like the woolly mammoth walked the earth (made tools out of their bones etc) but there is ZERO indications that man coexisted with Tyrannosaurus rex or Stegosaurus. Indeed, non-avian dinosaurs have NEVER coexisted with humans. (Obviously). - The idea that baby dinosaurs were running around the ark is seriously laughable.
- Joined
- 14 Jan 19
- Moves
- 4282
355d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe idea that there really was an actual ark is more seriously laughable.
Crikey.
Can I sell you a bridge?
Edit: Humans were certainly around when creatures like the woolly mammoth walked the earth (made tools out of their bones etc) but there is ZERO indications that man coexisted with Tyrannosaurus rex or Stegosaurus. Indeed, non-avian dinosaurs have NEVER coexisted with humans. (Obviously). - The idea that baby dinosaurs were running around the ark is seriously laughable.
But I am shopping around for a bridge. Details please? A bridge over troubled water?
355d
@pettytalk saidMore laughable then believing that a frog turned into a prince?
The idea that there really was an actual ark is more seriously laughable.
More laughable than believing that a dino which still contains original soft tissue and which tests positive for C14 that that has been laying underground for 200 million years?
https://tinyurl.com/ath-nonsens
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29893
355d
@pettytalk saidAgreed.
The idea that there really was an actual ark is more seriously laughable.
@carnivorum saidFlintstones is just a tv show / movie ... dont forget that.
And there are a lot of indications that man and dinos have been living together.