Game moderator vote II

Originally posted by cmsMaster
What the hell...

Ok...4th time I've tried to post this. Automod is beyond ridiculous.

1.Not selfish reasons, I want the best team possible.

2.Lets see your record for exposing.

3.I couldn't accuse you on here if I wanted to - nor did I ever, you're just paranoid.

You do understand that it's almost certainly irrelevant who gets more votes for 6th place, don't you? Russ is going to pick who he wants in the end. If he thinks Guy A is more fit to be on the team rather than Guy B, he's going to pick them regardless of whether guy A gets a few less votes than Guy B. More than likely, he won't pick either one of us and to delay the selection of Game Mods just to assuage your ego is a waste of time and we've already wasted two months.

My record is known and has been cited to by numerous posters in this thread. In the Contumelious Clan forum, I posted numerous analyses of various cheats - all but one of whom was subsequently banned or left the site. I still get requests from users I don't even know to run User X's games. You're out of your league.

"I know how to catch cheats without cheating myself" was directed at who? Go ahead and say it openly if it makes you feel better; I won't alert it and no one else will either. Try being honest for a change.

Originally posted by no1marauder
You do understand that it's almost certainly irrelevant who gets more votes for 6th place, don't you? Russ is going to pick who he wants in the end. If he thinks Guy A is more fit to be on the team rather than Guy B, he's going to pick them regardless of whether guy A gets a few less votes than Guy B. More than likely, he won't pick either one of us and better; I won't alert it and no one else will either. Try being honest for a change.

You should know from our PMs that I'm completely honest - I never bs.

I know it's irrelevant, No.1 - the whole thing is actually quite irrelevant. TBH, Russ has no damn clue who would be a better mod., just like the majority of people who voted - no offense to Phlab, but he should NEVER have more votes for something like this than a player like !~Tony~! - Phlab has been there and done that, but he just doesn't know his stuff as well as Tony, it's honestly not even close.

I'm not out of my league, No. 1. I can play with 1500s any day.

Originally posted by Phlabibit
His record is outstanding... he's offered up more names than most any other user here and probably has around .900 batting average. When he offers up a name, he includes data based on games he's run on his own.

If he'd like to make a list of users, that's up to him. I no longer have access to the area where the info was stored.

P-

Really...

How exactly did you find time for that, No. 1? You weren't a mod., yet you're making databases of games that these guys have?

Ever run my games, Tony's, Korch's, Tebbs, or Phlabs? I'd love to see your DBs on us.

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Really...

How exactly did you find time for that, No. 1? You weren't a mod., yet you're making databases of games that these guys have?

Ever run my games, Tony's, Korch's, Tebbs, or Phlabs? I'd love to see your DBs on us.

I forget the wording of the terms of submitting a name, but game mods asked users have some substantial evidence. Are you busting his balz for having an interest in keeping cheats off the site? Lots of users run their games through an engine after, No1 is in no way the only user who provided info like this.

P-

Originally posted by no1marauder
Here's a thread from long ago where I spout my "gay hating": http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=13144&page=1

I really doubt cash has any more credibility than arrakis, but lets just get this here as well, to keep the vote fair.


Originally posted by no1marauder (in the quoted thread):
"I see no reason to wait for the far off future to end discrimination against gays; let's have the debate now and has there are no logical reasons for this discrimination (as this thread shows) let's get rid of it NOW.



you really suck at gay bashing! 😵

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I forget the wording of the terms of submitting a name, but game mods asked users have some substantial evidence. Are you busting his balz for having an interest in keeping cheats off the site? Lots of users run their games through an engine after, No1 is in no way the only user who provided info like this.

P-

Phlab, if you took 5 seconds to pull your head from No. 1's ass, you might realize that I just asked out of curiosity how he found time to do such extensive analysis on such a huge amount of players.

Originally posted by cmsMaster
You should know from our PMs that I'm completely honest - I never bs.

I know it's irrelevant, No.1 - the whole thing is actually quite irrelevant. TBH, Russ has no damn clue who would be a better mod., just like the majority of people who voted - no offense to Phlab, but he should NEVER have more votes for something like this than a player like !~Tony~ ...[text shortened]... onestly not even close.

I'm not out of my league, No. 1. I can play with 1500s any day.

I was referring to you being "out of your league" insofar as detecting cheats here. BUT:

How would you know if you can play OTB competitvely with 1500's USCF? You've never done it in an OTB tournament. I thought I'd be in the 1700's easy right off based on my play on real time internet sites and off-hand games with a 1800 rated player, but it ain't as easy as it sounds.

Originally posted by no1marauder
I was referring to you being "out of your league" insofar as detecting cheats here. BUT:

How would you know if you can play OTB competitvely with 1500's USCF? You've never done it in an OTB tournament. I thought I'd be in the 1700's easy right off based on my play on real time internet sites and off-hand games with a 1800 rated player, but it ain't as easy as it sounds.

I've played a few unrated games OTB. I lost a game to a player in the high 1600s, won against a two 1400s and a 1300. I'm rated over 1500 on ICC. I was rated nearly 1700 on Playchess. I've been rated over 1700 on here, and I should be back around 1600 in a couple months after some games finish.

Now, you can make any argument you want, No. 1. But those numbers suggest that I can hang with any 1500 - except maybe those who can play at 2100 levels...

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Really...

How exactly did you find time for that, No. 1? You weren't a mod., yet you're making databases of games that these guys have?

Ever run my games, Tony's, Korch's, Tebbs, or Phlabs? I'd love to see your DBs on us.

No, I don't make up databases on everybody's games here. I run all my own games through Fritz though. I've had a depressing number of games against banned cheats here. If the results I get from my own games are suspicious, I might run some more of the particular user. If I'm asked, I might run enough of a user to get a couple hundred non-opening book moves in games against players with about the same rating. If someone's matching up with over 80% of Fritz's first choice or close equivalent (within .05 pawns) over that span, I consider that sufficient evidence to conclude they are using engine assistance and forward the results to the Game Mods (if we ever get any).

Been doing that for years here though I've taken a couple of hiatus. Whaddya you got?

Originally posted by no1marauder
No, I don't make up databases on everybody's games here. I run all my own games through Fritz though. I've had a depressing number of games against banned cheats here. If the results I get from my own games are suspicious, I might run some more of the particular user. If I'm asked, I might run enough of a user to get a couple hundred non-opening book mov ...[text shortened]... Been doing that for years here though I've taken a couple of hiatus. Whaddya you got?

I have less reason to report users, I don't really ever play them. That said, I believe I reported at least three - I remember 1 definite ban that occurred soon after my message, and one player who wasn't banned...

Of course, I'd never spend as much time looking for players cheating as Phlab suggests that you have unless I were a mod.

Originally posted by cmsMaster
I've played a few unrated games OTB. I lost a game to a player in the high 1600s, won against a two 1400s and a 1300. I'm rated over 1500 on ICC. I was rated nearly 1700 on Playchess. I've been rated over 1700 on here, and I should be back around 1600 in a couple months after some games finish.

Now, you can make any argument you want, No. 1. But t ...[text shortened]... ers suggest that I can hang with any 1500 - except maybe those who can play at 2100 levels...

As I said, if you want to call me a cheat because I play better on RHP than I do OTB, just have the guts to say so. I have a draw against a player rated 2070 and another about 1925, but I haven't maintained that level in all my games.

Try it and report back.

Originally posted by cmsMaster
I have less reason to report users, I don't really ever play them. That said, I believe I reported at least three - I remember 1 definite ban that occurred soon after my message, and one player who wasn't banned...

Of course, I'd never spend as much time looking for players cheating as Phlab suggests that you have unless I were a mod.

So I'm more dedicated than you; doesn't help your argument that you deserve a vote for Game Mod more than me much, does it? Your whole campaign seems to be based on innuendo anyway.

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Phlab, if you took 5 seconds to pull your head from No. 1's ass, you might realize that I just asked out of curiosity how he found time to do such extensive analysis on such a huge amount of players.

I like how verifying info is having my head in someone's ass. Also, where did 'huge amount' come from? Few is from 3 to 16. I doubt No1 handed in several names yet alone a 'huge amount'.

Also, you can't speculate your USCF rating. Go earn one.

P-

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I like how verifying info is having my head in someone's ass. Also, where did 'huge amount' come from? Few is from 3 to 16. I doubt No1 handed in several names yet alone a 'huge amount'.

Also, you can't speculate your USCF rating. Go earn one.

P-

LMAO...I've discussed my USCF rating plenty of times, trust me..I'll have one in just a few months, Phlab.

I got huge amount by you saying that he may have had "the most" of all players on the site.

If the whole debate about the USCF rating is for credibility I don't think it's even necessary for me to have one - I am, next to !~Tony~! and Tebb, the most credible candidate, it's quite clear that my play is clean. No.1 would be absolutely credible too, if his rating stood up to his play.

Speculation of a rating is entirely possible...considering I speculated that based on actual results.

No. 1, do you have an account on ICC or Playchess that might add to your credibility...?

Originally posted by Phlabibit
We all know that RN would throw his mother under a buss for clan mate.

FACT!

P-

Good luck on achieving your life-long ambition of dominating an internet chat site.