Debates
30 Oct 21
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 4827
07 Nov 21
@shavixmir saidYou are correct. People who own houses have to actually PAY their bills.
Typical right-wing lunacy.
You can’t compare a country to a house.
People who run countries just get the people who own houses to pay their bills.
@liljo saidI think all conservative posts of late,, such as this one, are gaining the edge on issues.There is a lot of floundering and lack of foundation with posts of the libs.
You are correct. People who own houses have to actually PAY their bills.
People who run countries just get the people who own houses to pay their bills.
@dood111 saidIt's depressingly amazing that right wingers are still parroting the outright lie that Biden intends to give all "illegal aliens" $450,000.
Check this out, latest Biden admin claim is that it's all Trump's fault they are going to give 450K apiece to all these illegals.
That figure comes from settlement negotiations regarding lawsuits resulting from the Trump administration's illegal separation of families (see my post on page 1). Allowing those lawsuits to go to trial would almost certainly result in greater expenses to the government given the likelihood of million dollar plus verdicts for plaintiffs.
If the government settles, it will undoubtedly save the taxpayers money.
07 Nov 21
@no1marauder saidthese illegals do not have standing to sue
It's depressingly amazing that right wingers are still parroting the outright lie that Biden intends to give all "illegal aliens" $450,000.
That figure comes from settlement negotiations regarding lawsuits resulting from the Trump administration's illegal separation of families (see my post on page 1). Allowing those lawsuits to go to trial would almost certainly resul ...[text shortened]... verdicts for plaintiffs.
If the government settles, it will undoubtedly save the taxpayers money.
07 Nov 21
@Mott-The-Hoople
I would have LOVED to see you at the border with your wife and child and border thugs say we are taking your baby.
I would LOVE to see what you would do.
07 Nov 21
@sonhouse saidI would have went back over the border where I belonged, then did it the right way.
@Mott-The-Hoople
I would have LOVED to see you at the border with your wife and child and border thugs say we are taking your baby.
I would LOVE to see what you would do.
07 Nov 21
1 edit
@no1marauder saidUhhhh, Marauder. These aliens broke the law and are collecting a jackpot. Cut the fat away,..... it appears that you find no problem with that?
It's depressingly amazing that right wingers are still parroting the outright lie that Biden intends to give all "illegal aliens" $450,000.
That figure comes from settlement negotiations regarding lawsuits resulting from the Trump administration's illegal separation of families (see my post on page 1). Allowing those lawsuits to go to trial would almost certainly resul ...[text shortened]... verdicts for plaintiffs.
If the government settles, it will undoubtedly save the taxpayers money.
If a burglar breaks into my home, suffering psychological trauma during the crime, should he be paid damages? You're scaring me, man, a member the Bar?
Could you square your bleeding heart with paying them FOUR times the money that Gold Star families receive? (Libs are not aware of G Star Families....look it up.) Could you explain why pay them anything? I think we should put them in jail to await deportation, and maybe a short course in keeping their families together . My family is all together . Put AvJoe down as someone who does not care about their voluntary-chosen family splitups.
You are making me find you reprehensible.
08 Nov 21
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidIt seems many of the plaintiffs were legally seeking asylum, but be that as it may even people acting illegally have rights which cannot be trampled on by illegal government action. Perhaps the Trump administration should have considered the likely consequences of their actions before deciding on such an inhumane and illegal policy; it seems many of these families still haven't been reunited despite court orders to do so.
Uhhhh, Marauder. These aliens broke the law and are collecting a jackpot. Cut the fat away,..... it appears that you find no problem with that?
If a burglar breaks into my home, suffering psychological trauma during the crime, should he be paid damages? You're scaring me, man, a member the Bar?
Could you square your bleeding heart with paying them FOUR times the mo ...[text shortened]... not care about their voluntary-chosen family splitups.
You are making me find you reprehensible.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
08 Nov 21
1 edit
@contenchess said...........Does anyone eIse know how 'farts in the mouth' taste
@no1marauder
The way you talk...
It's like...farts in my mouth.
Who wronged you so much that you are so anti American?
That is the story I want to hear.
or is contrenches the only one?
08 Nov 21
@jimm619 saidHahaha
...........Does anyone eIse know how 'farts in the mouth' tastes
or is contrenches the only one?
I still can’t believe ET and Starbuck got so much money.
What about Dr. Who? I mean, he’s visited the US multiple times. Is this how he finances his Tardis?
08 Nov 21
@averagejoe1 saidIs this a post or an exercise in wishful thinking ?
I think all conservative posts of late,, such as this one, are gaining the edge on issues.There is a lot of floundering and lack of foundation with posts of the libs.
08 Nov 21
@no1marauder saidThen why don't I feel sorry for them? Did we kidnap them or some such? Did they break a law like burglarizing a house, and suffer damages like the burglar who cut himself on the window pain, asking for money?
It seems many of the plaintiffs were legally seeking asylum, but be that as it may even people acting illegally have rights which cannot be trampled on by illegal government action. Perhaps the Trump administration should have considered the likely consequences of their actions before deciding on such an inhumane and illegal policy; it seems many of these families still haven't been reunited despite court orders to do so.
I challenge you to explain the difference to the Forum. If you mention the previous president the explanation will be quite weightless, as what they did has nothing to do with the president, and everything to do with breaking our laws.
Strange how libs define law differently than we constitutional conservatives. One would think there be one definition.
You are challenged! Repair to your study. 😕
08 Nov 21
@averagejoe1 saidApparently you "constitutional conservatives" define the law in a way that would be anathema to the people who wrote the Constitution. They left no doubt that all men had rights that governments can't trample on - please see the Declaration of Independence for further reference.
Then why don't I feel sorry for them? Did we kidnap them or some such? Did they break a law like burglarizing a house, and suffer damages like the burglar who cut himself on the window pain, asking for money?
I challenge you to explain the difference to the Forum. If you mention the previous president the explanation will be quite weightless, as what they did has n ...[text shortened]... vatives. One would think there be one definition.
You are challenged! Repair to your study. 😕
09 Nov 21
@no1marauder saidALL MEN have rights that governments cannot trample on.....that's enough to chew on, don't you think? For one thing, the word trample does not appear in the Constitution. Not to be picky, but I cannot respond to something that does not exist???
Apparently you "constitutional conservatives" define the law in a way that would be anathema to the people who wrote the Constitution. They left no doubt that all men had rights that governments can't trample on - please see the Declaration of Independence for further reference.
Tell us what you are saying, please?
09 Nov 21
@averagejoe1 saidSorry, I can't make it any clearer then I have made it in my posts already in this thread. If you know any non-idiots, ask them to translate for you.
ALL MEN have rights that governments cannot trample on.....that's enough to chew on, don't you think? For one thing, the word trample does not appear in the Constitution. Not to be picky, but I cannot respond to something that does not exist???
Tell us what you are saying, please?