Batches of the Juice Were 30% Lethal

Batches of the Juice Were 30% Lethal

Debates

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9624
77d
2 edits

@Metal-Brain said
@wildgrass
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/07/05/post-covid-19-vaccination-deaths.aspx?cid_source=dnlsubstack&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20240705_SU
Yeah it was pulled from the lancet because of the misinterpretation of the findings, not censorship.

If the cause of death in the group of corpses you start with are all previously vaccine-related, then of course the percentage confirmed will be a big number. The interpretation that 73% of deaths were from the vaccine is false. They were just independently validating.

So, nothing wrong with the study, but you are reading the results wrong.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22474
77d

@wildgrass said
Yeah it was pulled from the lancet because of the misinterpretation of the findings, not censorship.

If the cause of death in the group of corpses you start with are all previously vaccine-related, then of course the percentage confirmed will be a big number. The interpretation that 73% of deaths were from the vaccine is false. They were just independently validating.

So, nothing wrong with the study, but you are reading the results wrong.
What is your source of information?

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9624
77d

@Metal-Brain said
What is your source of information?
You posted the article.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22474
77d

@wildgrass
"Yeah it was pulled from the lancet because of the misinterpretation of the findings, not censorship."

What is your source of information?

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9624
77d
1 edit

@Metal-Brain said
@wildgrass
"Yeah it was pulled from the lancet because of the misinterpretation of the findings, not censorship."

What is your source of information?
Do you know how to do your own homework? Over and over again, metalbrain, posting links without reading content.

Everyone in the study group had already been determined to have died from COVID vaccination.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230706150350/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22474
77d

@wildgrass said
Do you know how to do your own homework? Over and over again, metalbrain, posting links without reading content.

Everyone in the study group had already been determined to have died from COVID vaccination.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230706150350/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137
That is the Lancet. They are a corrupt organization. Remember when they had to retract the hit piece on HCQ? They retracted it only because they had to.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

Other things they retract because they want to suppress anything that threatens profits for big pharma. But the journal did not withdraw the paper, citing the “public interest in the issue.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831678/

Vaccines cause autism. Hannah Poling is proof of that. The vaccine court would not have paid out if the vaccine did not cause her autism. It was hush money. Conditional that her family does not blame the vaccine.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9624
77d

@Metal-Brain said
That is the Lancet. They are a corrupt organization. Remember when they had to retract the hit piece on HCQ? They retracted it only because they had to.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

Other things they retract because they want to suppress anything that threatens profits for big pharma. But the jour ...[text shortened]... did not cause her autism. It was hush money. Conditional that her family does not blame the vaccine.
A spasm of words, mostly off topic.

The study you posted about vaccine deaths was able to substantiate that 74 % of deaths were vaccine related,.among a cohort of deaths that had already been attributed to the vaccine.

Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
69d

@shavixmir said
Who’s the idiot?
Your former link used numbers from the latter links, attempting to draw false conclusions, framing them in an alt-right fashion.

That is the difference.

So, for the last time: gimp boy… back to the rack. Have your mum piss on you and the koalas rape you.
You are not worth debating or wasting time on.

You constantly draw false conclusions and wrong summaries. It’s like all the eucalyptus jizz has eroded your brain.

Blathering moron.
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky: "(Repeating the question) Would I have an mRNA vaccine? The answer is no. I've been very clear about that. Would I advise my family to have an mRNA vaccine? At this stage the answer again is no."

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37112
69d

@Metal-Brain said
That is the Lancet. They are a corrupt organization. Remember when they had to retract the hit piece on HCQ? They retracted it only because they had to.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/lancet-retracts-large-study-hydroxychloroquine-n1225091

Other things they retract because they want to suppress anything that threatens profits for big pharma. But the jour ...[text shortened]... did not cause her autism. It was hush money. Conditional that her family does not blame the vaccine.
You lie, exactly like RFK Jr.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9624
69d

@Wajoma said
Professor Nikolai Petrovsky: "(Repeating the question) Would I have an mRNA vaccine? The answer is no. I've been very clear about that. Would I advise my family to have an mRNA vaccine? At this stage the answer again is no."
Fall back on conjecture as you lose the debate on actual vaccine deaths.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
69d

@Metal-Brain
You and the rest of your crew ignore the fact that without the vaccine millions more would have certainly died and now that some people may have reactions they are not in the multi million level the vaccine actually saved those lives.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22474
68d

@Suzianne said
You lie, exactly like RFK Jr.
Prove Kennedy lies.
False rumors do not prove anything.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22474
68d

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
You and the rest of your crew ignore the fact that without the vaccine millions more would have certainly died and now that some people may have reactions they are not in the multi million level the vaccine actually saved those lives.
The gene vaccines killed more people than they saved. They are not real vaccines. That is why they had to change the definition of vaccines to include mRNA vaccines utilizing gene therapy technology.

Real vaccines provide herd immunity. Gene vaccines do not. HCQ and Ivermectin could have saved many more lives had those proven safe medication been allowed to be prescribed. Instead you pushed a so called cure that was worse than the disease for 90% of all people.

Big pharma lied for the money. Why do you continue to defend the liars?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
68d

@Metal-Brain
You are so full of poop your FEET stink. Tell that to the folks still alive by the millions and how the death rate took a tumble after the vaccine was implemented.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
68d

@Suzianne
I wonder where metal head gets his data from when he states more people died from the vaccine than was helped?
Seems to be ignoring the obvious.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.