Another PM from STANG who continues to be very unfairly banned from the forums …
BelgianFreak,
You fail to acknowledge you covered up the fact that RHP management withdrew my banning and the fact that you banned me again on the basis of spamming when, in fact, I had only created 1 (ONE) thread in the Debates forum and in the Spirituality forum regarding different subjects.
That is NOT spamming !!!
Furthermore, the thread in the Debates forum was asking who had changed their opinion about Bush through time. This was the first time I had ever asked the question.
That is NOT spamming !!!
You also acknowledge having warned another player before banning them.
If you banned me for some reason other than spamming then you failed to provide me a warning about that, which I would have respected.
If you continue to abuse your position and do not withdraw my banning, I will ensure that:
(1) RHP management receives a request to have your position as “moderator” withdrawn
(2) Action by other disgruntled non-subscribing and subscribing members of RHP (many of whom have kindly supplied personal email addresses over the years)
Sincerely,
STANG
Originally posted by Sambo69Seems like it would make more sense for Stang to message BF, or Russ, or Chris directly rather than use you, Sambo, not a subscriber, to place a PM in a forum.
Another PM from STANG who continues to be very unfairly banned from the forums …
BelgianFreak,
You fail to acknowledge you covered up the fact that RHP management withdrew my banning and the fact that you banned me again on the basis of spamming when, in fact, I had only created 1 (ONE) thread in the Debates forum and in the Spirituality forum regard ...[text shortened]... any of whom have kindly supplied personal email addresses over the years)
Sincerely,
STANG
Is there something here we're supposed to debate? Like maybe Stang is Sambo and/or Sambo is Stang, for example.
Originally posted by DelmerSTANG LEADS TO STANG
Seems like it would make more sense for Stang to message BF, or Russ, or Chris directly rather than use you, Sambo, not a subscriber, to place a PM in a forum.
Is there something here we're supposed to debate? Like maybe Stang is Sambo and/or Sambo is Stang, for example.
Originally posted by Sambo69I 'second that emotion', STANG. Maybe we should discuss politics over a cup of coffee at the nearest Starbucks....? 😉
Another PM from STANG who continues to be very unfairly banned from the forums …
BelgianFreak,
You fail to acknowledge you covered up the fact that RHP management withdrew my banning and the fact that you banned me again on the basis of spamming when, in fact, I had only created 1 (ONE) thread in the Debates forum and in the Spirituality forum regard ...[text shortened]... any of whom have kindly supplied personal email addresses over the years)
Sincerely,
STANG
Originally posted by DelmerIt's interesting to note that innocent people continue to die because of Bush, STANG therefore continues to protest and BelgianFreak continues to ban him.
Seems like it would make more sense for Stang to message BF, or Russ, or Chris directly rather than use you, Sambo, not a subscriber, to place a PM in a forum.
Is there something here we're supposed to debate? Like maybe Stang is Sambo and/or Sambo is Stang, for example.
What's wrong here ?
Originally posted by Sambo69it's interesting that you write a lot like stang but without the caps. you've got his tone right on the mark.
It's interesting to note that innocent people continue to die because of Bush, STANG therefore continues to protest and BelgianFreak continues to ban him.
What's wrong here ?
Originally posted by Sambo69Quite correct. And as such, it is not a place in which you have any rights to speach what so ever. If you have issue with the administration of these forums, I humbly suggest you take it up with the administrators. There is no debate to be had on this subject. If STANG was, as you claim, wronged, then he now feels the sting of his past transgressions. If no one is interested in your rhetoric, it is because of these past transgressions.
You're in the wrong place. This is a debates forum attached to the chess site.
I myself once attempted, with great earnest, to have enjoyable conversations with him. He actually did with me, as he has with you, request I start a "petition" in the forums on his behalf and bemoaning of how he was "wronged". STANG has flamed and spammed me, both in the forums and in personal messages. This persisted for a very.....long....time. He was, in fact, a major cause for my leaving the site for a few months (from which I only recently returned). Although he had become banned for his absurd and irrationally imposing behaviour, I felt terribly drained from the experience, as his touch tended to sour my fruits as it were, impeding civilized conversation with nonsensical rhetoric.
So, in summary, if you are not but a shadow of STANG post on an alt account, heed my advice friend: leave it be. STANGs desire to get the message out for the good of all is comparable only to his self destructive, victimizing, self defeating methodology. If you appreciate what he has to say, then perhaps you can convey his message in a more appropriate medium. But as for assisting him with his latest victimization scheme......
I wouldn't give a squirt of piss for that boy.
This is all I shall speak on the matter. I have wasted hours upon hours on this fella, far too much time for some megalomaniac on the net.
Best Regards,
Omnislash
Originally posted by Sambo69Sambo69,
Another PM from STANG who continues to be very unfairly banned from the forums …
BelgianFreak,
You fail to acknowledge you covered up the fact that RHP management withdrew my banning and the fact that you banned me again on the basis of spamming when, in fact, I had only created 1 (ONE) thread in the Debates forum and in the Spirituality forum regard ...[text shortened]... any of whom have kindly supplied personal email addresses over the years)
Sincerely,
STANG
I think it is obvious that if a poster is banned it makews no sense to allow them to continue posting via another poster. Therefore any posts you make that are direct copies of STANG will be removed. If you persist then I will be forced to act as if you are an expension of STANG and therefore subject you to the same ban to you.
I hae explained that STANG is perminently banned, that is why his posts were removed and not necessarily their content. However, it was quickly evident that hjis style had not changed from when he was initially banned with the same photos and themes coming out again.
The only 'proof' that STANG has offered that Chris removed his ban is a copy of a PM that anyone could have written in which CHris is supposed to have said that he 'rarely gets involved in forum moderation' and ant no point says that he intends to removed your ban. If I am expected to believe that Chris removed STANGS ban I suggest that STANG asks him to PM me, or better still posts about his decision in the Moderators forum.
Great, ask for my removal as a mod. If the site admin chose to do so then I will ahppily respect their decision, but I am confident that they won't.
Regards
BF
BelgianFreak,
You made 2 allegations:
(1) STANG included a link to a picture more than once
(2) STANG continued to write about the same theme
Regarding (1) -
(a) Can you honestly say that you issued STANG a specific warning not to include a link to the picture ?
(b) Would you have preferred that STANG found new pictures of other horrifying things, committed by agents of the public, that the public needs to be aware of ?
Regarding (2) -
(a) Would it not be reasonable to write about the same theme, being the deaths of innocent civilians and Bush's involvement, when innocent civilians continue to be killed and Bush is a powerful person in the world ?
(b) Why do you claim that STANG's question whether people had changed their opinions of Bush is a repeated one ?
(c) Reviewing all the threads, why do you not ban others for tending to write about one theme ?
Finally -
(a) Do you honestly feel that you are being fair in reinstating STANG's ban, when I believe that he demonstrated reasonable restraint and compliance ?
(b) Please let us know what your personal opinion is on Bush and what's happening in Iraq, etc - Are you honestly neutral ?
Sambo69