- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 599494
27 May 06
1 edit
Originally posted by Sambo69Its nice to know Stang has a member to keep us all informed of his woes. Keep up the good work bf, the forums are a bit more palatable with your efforts
Another PM from STANG who continues to be very unfairly banned from the forums …
BelgianFreak,
You fail to acknowledge you covered up the fact that RHP management withdrew my banning and the fact that you banned me again on the basis of spamming when, in fact, I had only created 1 (ONE) thread in the Debates forum and in the Spirituality forum regard ...[text shortened]... any of whom have kindly supplied personal email addresses over the years)
Sincerely,
STANG
27 May 06
Originally posted by belgianfreakGets my rec, BF.
Sambo69,
I think it is obvious that if a poster is banned it makews no sense to allow them to continue posting via another poster. Therefore any posts you make that are direct copies of STANG will be removed. If you persist then I will be forced to act as if you are an expension of STANG and therefore subject you to the same ban to you.
I hae exp ...[text shortened]... n I will ahppily respect their decision, but I am confident that they won't.
Regards
BF
27 May 06
Originally posted by Sambo69Stang is a boring, tiring, repetitive, unimaginative propagandist. I cannot think of anything Stang has ever told us that we didn't already know. And for years he's repeated the same messages over and over again. If Bush was posting propaganda here I'm sure he would also get banned. And if you keep copying Stang's propaganda into the forums I hope you get banned.
BelgianFreak,
You made 2 allegations:
(1) STANG included a link to a picture more than once
(2) STANG continued to write about the same theme
Regarding (1) -
(a) Can you honestly say that you issued STANG a specific warning not to include a link to the picture ?
(b) Would you have preferred that STANG found new pictures of other horrifying th ...[text shortened]... pinion is on Bush and what's happening in Iraq, etc - Are you honestly neutral ?
Sambo69
27 May 06
Originally posted by Sambo69At what point does writing about yourself in the third person cease to be an understandable mode of expression and start moving into insanity?
BelgianFreak,
You made 2 allegations:
(1) STANG included a link to a picture more than once
(2) STANG continued to write about the same theme
Regarding (1) -
(a) Can you honestly say that you issued STANG a specific warning not to include a link to the picture ?
(b) Would you have preferred that STANG found new pictures of other horrifying th ...[text shortened]... pinion is on Bush and what's happening in Iraq, etc - Are you honestly neutral ?
Sambo69
27 May 06
Originally posted by Sambo69Sambo69,
BelgianFreak,
You made 2 allegations:
(1) STANG included a link to a picture more than once
(2) STANG continued to write about the same theme
Regarding (1) -
(a) Can you honestly say that you issued STANG a specific warning not to include a link to the picture ?
(b) Would you have preferred that STANG found new pictures of other horrifying th ...[text shortened]... pinion is on Bush and what's happening in Iraq, etc - Are you honestly neutral ?
Sambo69
Go tell STANG that he is wasting your time and ours. If you wishes educate the world with regards to the devil Bush, then the internet is full of sites that promote such wishes.
He might even get a honorary medal for posting shyte repeatedly.
By the way, am against the US Administration as well, but I respect the rules of this site. He was warned, from people posting, people PMing him, mod's etc. But he didn't get the hints.
So STANG, if you are reading this, thank you for telling us what we already know but please go get a life or spam another site.
Regards.
27 May 06
Originally posted by PeachyWell said Peachy and Omni.
Sambo69,
Go tell STANG that he is wasting your time and ours. If you wishes educate the world with regards to the devil Bush, then the internet is full of sites that promote such wishes.
He might even get a honorary medal for posting shyte repeatedly.
By the way, am against the US Administration as well, but I respect the rules of this site. He was w ...[text shortened]... for telling us what we already know but please go get a life or spam another site.
Regards.
27 May 06
2 edits
Originally posted by Sambo69If you are who you claim to be - a pretty new member who wasn't around when STANG flooded the forum with his posts -, reviewing all the threads won't give you a correct picture, as most of STANG's posts were deleted. Yes, there are others who repeat themselves a lot, but STANG took it to an extreme. There's a reason why many people who agree with his opinions support his ban.
(c) Reviewing all the threads, why do you not ban others for tending to write about one theme ?
27 May 06
Originally posted by belgianfreakI got almost exactly the same reply from Chris when I asked about a forum ban, so it's very unlikely that STANG made that up. But as you say, Chris' PM doesn't say anything about lifting the ban. If he doesn't usually get involved in forum moderation, that also means he may not even know exactly what happened, and it seems that there are no logs kept, so it would seem very strange if he'd lift a ban without discussing it with the moderator who gave the ban.
The only 'proof' that STANG has offered that Chris removed his ban is a copy of a PM that anyone could have written in which CHris is supposed to have said that he 'rarely gets involved in forum moderation' and ant no point says that he intends to removed your ban.
27 May 06
2 edits
Originally posted by Sambo69Lets see if Sambo has the guts and honesty to actually become a paying member of Red Hot Pawn before stirring up more trouble.
Let's see if BelgianFreak has the guts and honesty to reply to the specific questions. For example, "Do you honestly feel that you are being fair in reinstating STANG's ban, when I believe that he demonstrated reasonable restraint and compliance" ?
Seems like a person ought to have to buy a ticket before he can complain about the show.
27 May 06
Originally posted by NordlysIt's interesting that STANG appears to have been banned for months and this was withdrawn shortly after his correspondence with RHP management. It makes it all the more believable.
I got almost exactly the same reply from Chris when I asked about a forum ban, so it's very unlikely that STANG made that up. But as you say, Chris' PM doesn't say anything about lifting the ban. If he doesn't usually get involved in forum moderation, that also means he may not even know exactly what happened, and it seems that there are no logs kept, so it ...[text shortened]... very strange if he'd lift a ban without discussing it with the moderator who gave the ban.
28 May 06
Originally posted by DelmerI did buy a ticket, and it got me nowhere. Although STANG may be annoying, the moderators here are on a powertrip. Banning STANG is one thing, deleting the threads that he created, but that we were ALL using to have a discussion shows that the moderator needed to throw his weight around a little bit.
Lets see if Sambo has the guts and honesty to actually become a paying member of Red Hot Pawn before stirring up more trouble.
Seems like a person ought to have to buy a ticket before he can complain about the show.
Plenty of decent threads have been deleted. I have complained multiple times and have gotten the same response: "we don't get involved with the moderators."
Obviously they don't value my subscription 🙂
28 May 06
Originally posted by DraxusI did notice that you bought a ticket, Draxus, and I'm sure that the administrators do value your subscription. I was engaged, as you were, with Stang during his last incarnation and did not see anything bannable happening, but I also did not realize that he evidently was still under a ban.
I did buy a ticket, and it got me nowhere. Although STANG may be annoying, the moderators here are on a powertrip. Banning STANG is one thing, deleting the threads that he created, but that we were ALL using to have a discussion shows that the moderator needed to throw his weight around a little bit.
Plenty of decent threads have been deleted. I have co ...[text shortened]... we don't get involved with the moderators."
Obviously they don't value my subscription 🙂
Perhaps the word moderator is unfortunate. Suppose we think of the moderators as editors and the forums as newspapers. Do you have a problem with editors editing copy in newspapers? I don't. After all, the owner of a newspaper can pretty well call the shots, within legal limits, when it comes to the content of his newspaper.
28 May 06
Originally posted by Sambo69Why don't you play some chess, Sambo? Or have you just signed on to represent a fellow Strilian who has made a thorough nuisance of himself; a not uncommon trait of your compatriots?
It's interesting that STANG appears to have been banned for months and this was withdrawn shortly after his correspondence with RHP management. It makes it all the more believable.