Originally posted by generalissimoYou say it is true and propaganda at the same time!!
It is true, but Jlilly is maliciously using the deaths of these people for her communist propaganda, can't you see that?
Propaganda isn't when people repeatedly tell you the truth you know. Propaganda is when people tell you lies or enforce a common and incorrect view with it wrapped up as truth.
Do you prefer not to hear a truth that threatens your perception of things?
Originally posted by randolphSeveral things:
And why ever do (we) always equate socialism with universal health care? There are a lot of people that can't afford health care, and that has nothing to do with being lazy. It's more of a matter of bringing our standard of civilization up to the 20th century. France has an excellent health care system, and it neither puts an undue burden on their citizens with taxes or makes it a socialist country.
- France is a highly socialist country.
- The Securite Sociale covers less and less of health care costs each year. You now need to purchase private health insurance either on your own or through your employer to make up the difference.
- For the government to fund even that, they tax gasoline heavily (i.e. doubling to quadrupling the price relative to the US).
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterSure, and smoking doesn't cause cancer, right?
Uhm, no one has proven that man is causing "global warming" -- no one. And another thing, I don't like your nomenclature, it has the ring of "Holocaust denier" about it. Also, the NCPA is a libertarian think tank and "exxon mobil" should be written "Exxon Mobil."
Give me a break.
Originally posted by WheelyI thought you wouldn't understand it.
You say it is true and propaganda at the same time!!
Propaganda isn't when people repeatedly tell you the truth you know. Propaganda is when people tell you lies or enforce a common and incorrect view with it wrapped up as truth.
Do you prefer not to hear a truth that threatens your perception of things?
She is saying that the deaths of those people happen as a consequence of capitalism, she believes that in a socialist state those people wouldn't die.
The fact that those people die because they can't afford treatment, does not mean we should take someone else's money to pay for it.
Originally posted by WajomaThat's like saying attempted suicide doesn't cause death but it increases your chances. If that's all you have going for you in terms of argument, ie:- a lack of competence to top yourself or not really smoking hard enough to cause damage, then what you're doing is let the exception be the rule!
Smoking doesn't cause cancer Howie, it increases the chances. The guvamint mandated graffiti that manufacturers have to deface their own product with doesn't even tell lies like you Howie.
Originally posted by generalissimoThat would depend if you want to live in a civilization or not, doesn't it?
The fact that those people die because they can't afford treatment, does not mean we should take someone else's money to pay for it.
I can hardly imagine a civilization wanting dead people rotting in the streets, spreading the bubonic plague, typhoid and God knows what else.
Or do you suppose the streets shouldn't be there in the first place, because there's no central organization of networks?
And who should clean the rotting corpses out of the mud? The individuals?
No. See. That's why we have civilization. To make sure these things happen. That's why we have taxes and such.
Originally posted by kmax87First there's shavs idea of a socialist paradise - humans throw off their clothes and swim like dolphins and now here's kmax with his gross exaggerations. I'm here for the laffs.
That's like saying attempted suicide doesn't cause death but it increases your chances. If that's all you have going for you in terms of argument, ie:- a lack of competence to top yourself or not really smoking hard enough to cause damage, then what you're doing is let the exception be the rule!
Originally posted by generalissimoStill not propaganda though is it. It's an opinion which may or may not be correct. There's no attempt to conceal the truth with misleading statements. Just an opinion.
I thought you wouldn't understand it.
She is saying that the deaths of those people [b]happen as a consequence of capitalism, she believes that in a socialist state those people wouldn't die.
The fact that those people die because they can't afford treatment, does not mean we should take someone else's money to pay for it.[/b]
Many of the articles linked to on here on the other hand do attempt to push an agenda by being economical with the truth. That is propaganda. As a prime example take "The charade is finally over -- turns out B. Hussein Obama ain't constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States of America. Hooray!
http://www.obamacrimes.com/"
That is propaganda because it presents as fact something which is not. It is done in the most insidious and dishonest manner such as has gotten entire populations into serious problems throughout history.
Originally posted by WajomaDolphins do nothing but eat and shag all day.
First there's shavs idea of a socialist paradise - humans throw off their clothes and swim like dolphins and now here's kmax with his gross exaggerations. I'm here for the laffs.
Presumabely a better lifestyle than is promised to most humans.
Originally posted by WajomaI don't think I'm in an average position.
Who promised you what?
It's your life shav.
However, many people are.
And if one's working 10 hours a day (to make someone else rich), doesn't see the big picture and struggles to pay the bills every month, I'm sure that swimming about, eating and shagging sounds like a perfectly acceptable alternative.
Originally posted by shavixmirStupidest comment you've made in a long time. If a person did nothing but eat and screw the end result would be a sorry sight indeed. Kind of like a welfare ridden parasite that lives off the taxes of others and complains about how those supporting him are also making someone else rich by working.
Dolphins do nothing but eat and shag all day.
Presumabely a better lifestyle than is promised to most humans.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamThe only person I can think of that led a lifestyle like that was Big John Holmes. They fed him all the cocaine he could ingest and presented him with a parade of whores to fornicate with...on camera! This lasted for about two years until he died of AIDs.
Stupidest comment you've made in a long time. If a person did nothing but eat and screw the end result would be a sorry sight indeed. Kind of like a welfare ridden parasite that lives off the taxes of others and complains about how those supporting him are also making someone else rich by working.