Go back
Has Biden taken us closer to nuclear war?

Has Biden taken us closer to nuclear war?

Debates

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121028
Clock
36d

@KingDavid403 said
"Sky News
Founder: Keith Rupert Murdoch"

All I need to know.
Nice straw man

KingDavid403
King David

Planet Earth.

Joined
19 May 05
Moves
176373
Clock
36d

@divegeester said
Nice straw man
Yes he is.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
36d

@divegeester said
How do you translate that into me saying that both sides currently want to negotiate?
Then I'm not sure what exactly is your point.

If you're now conceding that in their present positions neither wants to negotiate, what is your objection to Biden trying to strengthen the position of Ukraine vis-a-vis Russia?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121028
Clock
36d
1 edit

@no1marauder said
Then I'm not sure what exactly is your point.

If you're now conceding that in their present positions neither wants to negotiate, what is your objection to Biden trying to strengthen the position of Ukraine vis-a-vis Russia?
As someone who has claimed to be a lawyer I am continually struck by how hopeless you are at not being able to understand written text, how you misinterpret electoral data and generally conflate issues.

If you cannot understand what I’ve written in this thread, especially when there are multiple media opinions stating exactly the same thing, one of which I’ve actually posted a video link to, then I’m not going to waste time explaining it to you.

There is no way you are a lawyer, you simply lack the cognitive ability.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121028
Clock
36d

Misinformation coming out of Ukraine as Western official denies Ukraine claim that Russia fired ballistic missile at them.

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-latest-putin-zelenskyy-live-sky-news-12541713?postid=8652331#liveblog-body

Dnipro attack weapon not an intercontinental ballistic missile, official says

A Western official has now said the weapon used in the attack was not an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).
That directly contradicts a statement from the Ukrainian air force, which claimed this morning that it was an ICBM that struck Dnipro, causing fires (read more on the Ukrainian claims here).
According to the Associated Press, that would have marked the first time an ICBM had been used in the Russia-Ukraine war, but the official's comments cast doubt on that being the case.
The Western official said the weapon was a ballistic missile, but declined to provide further details.
We're yet to have any official confirmation that the weapon used was, or was not, an ICBM.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22654
Clock
36d

@no1marauder said
Then I'm not sure what exactly is your point.

If you're now conceding that in their present positions neither wants to negotiate, what is your objection to Biden trying to strengthen the position of Ukraine vis-a-vis Russia?
"what is your objection to Biden trying to strengthen the position of Ukraine vis-a-vis Russia?"

Russia might nuke Ukraine. Is that how Biden is going to strengthen the position of Ukraine?

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-issues-warning-us-with-new-nuclear-doctrine-2024-11-19/

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37419
Clock
36d

@Metal-Brain said
Russia might nuke Ukraine.
And you can't freaking wait, can you?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
36d

@divegeester said
As someone who has claimed to be a lawyer I am continually struck by how hopeless you are at not being able to understand written text, how you misinterpret electoral data and generally conflate issues.

If you cannot understand what I’ve written in this thread, especially when there are multiple media opinions stating exactly the same thing, one of which I’ve actually ...[text shortened]... e explaining it to you.

There is no way you are a lawyer, you simply lack the cognitive ability.
Boy, you really don't even try, do you?

Personal attacks as part of this pathetic one sided vendetta you've created are not an answer to the incoherence you've displayed here.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
36d

@Metal-Brain said
"what is your objection to Biden trying to strengthen the position of Ukraine vis-a-vis Russia?"

Russia might nuke Ukraine. Is that how Biden is going to strengthen the position of Ukraine?

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-issues-warning-us-with-new-nuclear-doctrine-2024-11-19/
No, they won't just because Ukraine is hitting military targets close to the border and has gotten some land mines.

spruce112358
It's All A Joke

Joined
23 Oct 04
Moves
4402
Clock
36d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain said
Russia might nuke Ukraine.
Giving up those nukes in 1994 is looking pretty stupid, ain't it? 😆

spruce112358
It's All A Joke

Joined
23 Oct 04
Moves
4402
Clock
36d

The lesson from Ukraine to the rest of the world is extraordinarily clear:

"Get nukes as fast as you can and by any means necessary or you will not survive. NO ONE WILL HELP YOU!"

Iran has heard the message. So has every other nation on the planet.

Now, go on. Tell me about how nuclear war is made LESS likely through appeasement! 😆

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22654
Clock
36d

@spruce112358 said
Giving up those nukes in 1994 is looking pretty stupid, ain't it? 😆
Only assuming Ukraine would not have used them. But even if they kept them Russia has far more nukes than Ukraine had.

spruce112358
It's All A Joke

Joined
23 Oct 04
Moves
4402
Clock
36d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain said
Only assuming Ukraine would not have used them. But even if they kept them Russia has far more nukes than Ukraine had.
The ability to succeed in a nuclear strike on the opposing capital keeps any nation safe. Don't need a lotta nukes. Just a few well-aimed ones. 😀

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121028
Clock
36d

@no1marauder said
Boy, you really don't even try, do you?

Personal attacks as part of this pathetic one sided vendetta you've created are not an answer to the incoherence you've displayed here.
Are you going to start throwing insults again as part of your own “pathetic vendetta”?

“Vendetta” lol you think I care about you or your partisan opinions that much 😂

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
36d

@spruce112358 said
Giving up those nukes in 1994 is looking pretty stupid, ain't it? 😆
In truth, the weapons were under operational control of Moscow anyway and it's doubtful Ukraine could have used them anyway.

And Ukraine had already signed the Lisbon Protocol to START I in 1992 which committed it to becoming a non-nuclear weapon state under the auspices of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.