36d
@Rajk999 said300 km’s is the range.
The issue is that now Ukraine is firing long-range missiles at Russian towns and weapons installations far inside Russian territory. Whoever supplies Ukraine with these are going to come under attack from Russian nukes. This is what Putin threatened. The UK is on the list.
36d
@divegeester saidI do just fine. Calling people you do not know "Hamas supporters" is your wider problem; among a few other things.
Your inability to “help yourself” is part of your wider problem.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@shavixmir saidBiden is “thwarting” Putin by ordering this escalation whilst simultaneously closing the US embassy and withdrawing the personnel due to a subsequent significant threat of attack?
Uh, he’s thwarting Putin.
trump is a loose canon who’s just gonna wreck all hell and give Putin what he wants.
That’s an interesting perspective.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@KingDavid403 saidI have said no such thing, you’re making that up.
Calling people you do not know "Hamas supporters" is your wider problem; among a few other things.
36d
2 edits
@divegeester said("It’s curious how you Arab sympathisers don’t take this arbitrary approach when assessing the Middle East war."😉
I have said no such thing, you’re making that up.
Liar.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@KingDavid403 saidI’m not lying. This is what you claimed I said.
"It’s curious how you Arab sympathisers don’t take this arbitrary approach when assessing the Middle East war."
Liar.
“Calling people you do not know "Hamas supporters" is your wider problem; among a few other things.”
@divegeester saidThat is what you said liar. Look back at your posts; liar dumb arse. Notice the word: YOU in your post.
I’m not lying. This is what you claimed I said.
“Calling people you do not know "Hamas supporters" is your wider problem; among a few other things.”
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@KingDavid403 saidI’m not lying, I just copy pasted from my post which you are referring to.
That is what you said liar. Look back at your posts; liar dumb arse. Notice the word: YOU in your post.
Carry on escalating the insults if it makes you feel better about your mistake.
36d
@divegeester saidAs you have an extremely short memory, I will re-post: 😆
Dodge noted.
"You forgot 1917. Did you NEVER pay attention in History Class!?!"
Now you need to Google WWI and read about the OTHER way conflicts end. The way you forgot to list but which is very relevant to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
I'm not here to read to you.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@spruce112358 saidAsking about my memory and asking me to look up google is not a response to my request for you to explain how the end of WW1 occurred and how it is relevant to ending the Ukraine war sprucy.
As you have an extremely short memory, I will re-post: 😆
"You forgot 1917. Did you NEVER pay attention in History Class!?!"
Now you need to Google WWI and read about the OTHER way conflicts end. The way you forgot to list but which is very relevant to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
I'm not here to read to you.
@divegeester saidBoth sides have to agree to an armistice and neither seems willing to do so at this point nor does there seem to be any likely compromise which will lead to a peace treaty.
Asking about my memory and asking me to look up google is not a response to my request for you to explain how the end of WW1 occurred and how it is relevant to ending the Ukraine war sprucy.
Maybe you could share something both Russia and Ukraine would agree on.
36d
@divegeester saidI'll help you out. You said this. Now do your homework and add #4 😆
Asking about my memory and asking me to look up google is not a response to my request for you to explain how the end of WW1 occurred and how it is relevant to ending the Ukraine war sprucy.
Wars only end in one of three ways:
1) one side is completely destroyed e.g. Nazi Germany
2) one side backs down, this ain’t going to happen
3) negotiation
4)
Hint: 1917. Russia.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@no1marauder saidYou’re talking to the wrong person marauder; it is spruce who seems to think there is a fourth option on how a war could end in addition to the three I listed. You ok to ask him or are you happy with the questions I’ve already put to him.
Both sides have to agree to an armistice and neither seems willing to do so at this point nor does there seem to be any likely compromise which will lead to a peace treaty.
Maybe you could share something both Russia and Ukraine would agree on.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121015
36d
@spruce112358 saidThird time of asking …
I'll help you out. You said this. Now do your homework and add #4 😆
Wars only end in one of three ways:
1) one side is completely destroyed e.g. Nazi Germany
2) one side backs down, this ain’t going to happen
3) negotiation
4)
Hint: 1917. Russia.
Please feel free to expand upon your fourth way which a war can end without involving any of the three I’ve mentioned earlier.