@vivify saidSo a non murdering dictator can be trusted? You don't even know Putin is a dictator. They hold elections. If Russia is a dictatorship how did the CIA get Yeltsin in power by election meddling?
Yes because Russia is run by a murderous dictator.
Is there any reason to doubt Brazil's decision?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-meddling-in-1996-russian-elections-in-support-of-boris-yeltsin/5568288
How can you election meddle and get results in a country that has rigged elections?
@shavixmir
No, you just want to avoid answering these simple questions:
If Russia is a dictatorship how did the CIA get Yeltsin in power by election meddling?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-meddling-in-1996-russian-elections-in-support-of-boris-yeltsin/5568288
How can you election meddle and get results in a country that has rigged elections?
@metal-brain saidWhether Russia was or wasn't a dictatorship in 1991, it certainly is now under Putin.
@shavixmir
No, you just want to avoid answering these simple questions:
If Russia is a dictatorship how did the CIA get Yeltsin in power by election meddling?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-meddling-in-1996-russian-elections-in-support-of-boris-yeltsin/5568288
How can you election meddle and get results in a country that has rigged elections?
Note how you still haven't answered what about Brazil's decision there is to disagree with. You accuse Shav of avoiding questions when that's exactly what you've been doing these last few posts.
You wouldn't be Metal Brain without that hypocrisy.
@metal-brain saidYour given (that the CIA put Yeltsin in power) is BS, and so your entire argument is BS.
So a non murdering dictator can be trusted? You don't even know Putin is a dictator. They hold elections. If Russia is a dictatorship how did the CIA get Yeltsin in power by election meddling?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-meddling-in-1996-russian-elections-in-support-of-boris-yeltsin/5568288
How can you election meddle and get results in a country that has rigged elections?
@helder-octavio-borges saidClaro. ¿De qué quiere hablar en concreto?
https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1752432671144497367/photo/1
Tem alguém aqui que queira falar sobre o Brasil com um... brasileiro?
@helder-octavio-borges saidO Twitter não tem boa reputação. Procure fontes mais fiáveis, como uma agência noticiosa real.
@vivify
Pode começar comentando o tweet que coloquei acima.
@vivify
Bill Maher não é uma fonte confiável, e traz uma mensagem fraca e enviesada.
Além do mais, o Twitter é uma ferramenta. O que está escrito pela PESSOA que usa a ferramenta é o que importa.
Tente de novo. Analise a MENSAGEM, não só o MENSAGEIRO.
@Metal-Brain
I guess you figure in the US constitution section 3 saying anyone who commits insurrection is to be barred from being in any official office of the US.
There are rules for those who want to be POTUS.
For instance, you know about the rule you have to be 35 minimum age.
Or the part where a Swede or Russian or anyone not American cannot be POTUS.
Article 3 is just another list of who can run for POTUS or any other office.
And don't give me the 'POTUS didn't swear oath' crap,
Trump STARTED the insurrection and also don't EVEN go WHAT insurrection Commie.
SCOTUS is going to weigh in on the issue and no doubt will let Trump run but they are also looking at Trump's idea he has total immunity from ANY prosecution for ANY crime no matter how vile because he was POTUS. Which is BS in any language.
@helder-octavio-borges saidEstoy dispuesto a utilizar una fuente de noticias real como la BBC, El País o Al Jazeera. No Twitter.
@vivify
Bill Maher não é uma fonte confiável, e traz uma mensagem fraca e enviesada.
Além do mais, o Twitter é uma ferramenta. O que está escrito pela PESSOA que usa a ferramenta é o que importa.
Tente de novo. Analise a MENSAGEM, não só o MENSAGEIRO.
There was no insurrection on January sixth - none whatsoever. There was no planned attack to overturn democracy - it was a protest that turned into a riot on the police line, and the attempt to resolve it was to let protesters into the capitol building to diffuse their anger, which largely worked.
@philokalia saidhttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-capitol-jan-6-panel-turns-attention-pence-thursdays-hearing-2022-06-16/
There was no insurrection on January sixth - none whatsoever. There was no planned attack to overturn democracy - it was a protest that turned into a riot on the police line, and the attempt to resolve it was to let protesters into the capitol building to diffuse their anger, which largely worked.
Trump pressed, threatened Pence to overturn election
The certification vote on Jan. 6 had become a focus for Trump, who saw it as a last-ditch chance to retain the presidency despite his loss at the polls.
Trump pressured Pence to not certify the election on Jan 6th, which is the Vice President's job.
Trump planned Jan 6th to stop the transfer of power, not simply protest. Hence, why it was an inssurrection.