Invasion of Lebanon and threatening Iran

@shavixmir said
No, it is not.
And as for Gaza… where the hell else, other than in civilian centres do you reckon Hamas could set up shop?

Have you ever been there? It’s tiny and quite crowded.

Yes it is.

No I have not been to Gaza, have you?
And if so did you do an assessment of 140 square miles where Hamas could have their bases instead of under hospitals and civilian places.

Don’t be so assinine.
And stop defending Hamas!

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Free of religion taking over as the official state religion and other religions are persecuted. That for starters. Women getting killed for daring to have hair showing, even one strand is a death penalty.

I didn't know you had such a problem with Saudi Arabia.
We need to invade SA to give them freedom.

@divegeester said
Yes it is.

No I have not been to Gaza, have you?
And if so did you do an assessment of 140 square miles where Hamas could have their bases instead of under hospitals and civilian places.

Don’t be so assinine.
And stop defending Hamas!

I’m not defending Hamas.
I don’t like them. They are not my type.

I do, however, have a thing about protecting children. Anyone’s.

140 square miles is not a lot for the size of the populations.

Well, thank the lord, the Israeli’s are solving that problem, one burnt kid’s corspse at a time.

@divegeester said
Yes it is.

No I have not been to Gaza, have you?
And if so did you do an assessment of 140 square miles where Hamas could have their bases instead of under hospitals and civilian places.

Don’t be so assinine.
And stop defending Hamas!

If you are going to repeat propaganda get it right. In every kitchen.
If you have a kitchen you need to be bombed. If you don't want to be bombed get rid of your kitchens.

https://odysee.com/@KimIversen:d/netanyahu-makes-outrageous-claim-of:c

@shavixmir said
I’m not defending Hamas.
I don’t like them. They are not my type.

I do, however, have a thing about protecting children. Anyone’s.

140 square miles is not a lot for the size of the populations.

Well, thank the lord, the Israeli’s are solving that problem, one burnt kid’s corspse at a time.

Why don’t you start a thread on the raped burnt corpses of Israeli men women and children for a change.

[redacted]

@divegeester said
Why don’t you start a thread on the raped burnt corpses of Israeli men women and children for a change.

[redacted]

Why?
Is Lebanon invading Israel?

@vivify said

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/06/israel-occupation-50-years-of-dispossession/

For the last 50 years Israel has been forcing Palestinians off their land, occupying and illegally using it to create settlements that exclusively house Jewish Israeli settlers

You posted this already and I responded, but you refused to acknowledge the reasons for what you call settlements. Here is a summary of it again.

1. In the case of post 1949 War of Indepencence, the Nakba occurred when the Arabs fled Palestine because, THEY ATTACKED the Jews, they lost the war and they fled. According to the UN, there is the right of return for returning refugees BUT, there is a condition: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 (III) of 11 December 1948, 11. Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date ... The Arabs fail miserably. There is no living at peace with these Arabs. The Jews are justified in stopping them from returning. Some Arabs live at peace and there are 2,000,000 of them in Israel.

2. There are situations, which occurred post 1967, involving suicide bombing. Suidide bombers were promised, by their leaders, that their families will be rich and well paid if they killed Jews. To counteract this the Jews warned that anyone doing this will die knowing that their famillies will be killed, their houses demolished and sometimes even their who village destroyed. Eventually the Jews took over the whole village.

Many of these settlements are the result of terrorism, where properties were abandoned. There is no right of return for terrorists.

@Rajk999 said
You posted this already and I responded, but you refused to acknowledge the reasons for what you call settlements. Here is a summary of it again.

1. In the case of post 1949 War of Indepencence, the Nakba occurred when the Arabs fled Palestine because, THEY ATTACKED the Jews, they lost the war and they fled. According to the UN, there is the right of return for return ...[text shortened]... e result of terrorism, where properties were abandoned. There is no right of return for terrorists.

Like fvck they fled, you lying fascist scumbag.
They were ethnically cleansed and had to flee or die.

Barrels of flaming oil were rolled down hills into Palestinian villages.
Men were rounded up and tortured.
The list of barbaric attrocities are long and harsh.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestinian_expulsion_and_flight

In the 1948 Palestine war, more than 700,000 Palestinian Arabs – about half of Mandatory Palestine's predominantly Arab population – were expelled or fled from their homes, at first by Zionist paramilitaries,[a] and after the establishment of Israel, by its military.

Read some Ilian Pappe. For example: The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.

Stop parrotting zionist propaganda.

Dozens of massacres targeting Arabs were conducted by Israeli military forces and between 400 and 600 Palestinian villages were destroyed. Village wells were poisoned in a biological warfare programme codenamed Operation Cast Thy Bread and properties were looted to prevent Palestinian refugees from returning.[2][3] Other sites were subject to Hebraization of Palestinian place names.

@shavixmir said
Why?
Is Lebanon invading Israel?

Dodge all you want. You complain all the time about Israel, but I hardly remember a peep from you after October 7th.

And as for Lebanon, if they choose to allow a foreign player to launch missiles from their country then they (and you) shouldn’t be surprised when the target responds. I would do exactly the same.

Don’t start wars.
Don’t fire missiles from your country into said war.
Don’t threaten a nation with genocide.
Fuk about and find out.

@divegeester said
Dodge all you want. You complain all the time about Israel, but I hardly remember a peep from you after October 7th.

And as for Lebanon, if they choose to allow a foreign player to launch missiles from their country then they (and you) shouldn’t be surprised when the target responds. I would do exactly the same.

Don’t start wars.
Don’t fire missiles from your country into said war.
Don’t threaten a nation with genocide.
Fuk about and find out.

You wee supporter of Israeli state-sponsored terrorism, you.

@shavixmir said
Like fvck they fled, you lying fascist scumbag.
They were ethnically cleansed and had to flee or die.

Barrels of flaming oil were rolled down hills into Palestinian villages.
Men were rounded up and tortured.
The list of barbaric attrocities are long and harsh.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestinian_expulsion_and_flight

In the 1948 Palestine war, ...[text shortened]... s from returning.[2][3] Other sites were subject to Hebraization of Palestinian place names.

It was a war, that they started. Of course, in a war, that YOU START, if you are losing then you better run otherwise you are going to die. There is no ethnic cleansing in a war.

Serves them right too.

@shavixmir said
You wee supporter of Israeli state-sponsored terrorism, you.

No I’m not.

I’m a pragmatist when it comes to countries being attacked by other wanting to start a war.

Your a wee supporter of Islamist terrorism aren’t you.

@divegeester said
No I’m not.

I’m a pragmatist when it comes to countries being attacked by other wanting to start a war.

Your a wee supporter of Islamist terrorism aren’t you.

Nope. I have no love for fundamentalists.

@shavixmir said
You wee supporter of Israeli state-sponsored terrorism, you.

I support Israeli state-sponsored counter-terrorism. As long as you are dealing with terrorists your MO has to be different. They follow no rules, and you need to do the same otherwise you are going to be eaten alive, something the European countries are now finding out.

@sh76 said
Depends how Israel reacts.

Today was (thankfully) a repeat of April. Iran felt it was bound to avenge Haniyeh and Nasrallah. It was probably more about Haniyeh, since that was on Iranian soil.

Whatever Israel does, I hope it's surgical, such as a low profile taking out of a missile defense system like last time.

So, while we're one step closer to open war between Israel ...[text shortened]... he part about Hezbollah being partially neutralized and Iran not having much of a proxy left stands.

Israel's ground invading Lebanon, Iran and Hezbollah fired a bunch of missiles at the country and 7 were killed in a terrorist shooting in Tel Aviz.

You think that's a day to celebrate how well things are going for Israel?