Okay. I read up about it and her.
Seemingly she’s been under investigation or interviewed about it since 2016.
It’s not sure yet if the charges are actually going to be brought, they’re still investigating her role in it.
She says that she didn’t know people were being killed.
And that there, that’s probably what this is about.
She’s probably managed to stay unnoticed in society and then was found.
During interviews she’s then stated: “I knew nothin’”.
In a small camp, with mass starvation, execution and even gas chambers... she knew nothin’.
Either that is true (it’s hardly likely it’s true) or she has to face the facts and the shame.
She won’t go to prison or be fined or anything. She’s an example of attrocities and that one can never hide from justice.
Obviously you can ask the question: isn’t it time to let the past go?
But looking at society and what’s happening, it’s probably best to hound the bastards as much as possible.
@shavixmir saidLet's say for the sake of argument she did know people were being killed in the camp.
Okay. I read up about it and her.
Seemingly she’s been under investigation or interviewed about it since 2016.
It’s not sure yet if the charges are actually going to be brought, they’re still investigating her role in it.
She says that she didn’t know people were being killed.
And that there, that’s probably what this is about.
She’s probably managed to stay ...[text shortened]... oking at society and what’s happening, it’s probably best to hound the bastards as much as possible.
Does that make a secretary "complicit" in the murders? How about a janitor?
And what really is the point of prosecution at this time anyway?
What about the Jews who worked for the Nazis during that time?
Execute Everyone!!
See how stupid it is?
It was a crazy time.
No German or any other person will choose death over working for the Nazis.
Ya maybe two or three did...
But on a mass scale?
Grow up people.
What's next?
Send me to prison cause I said the N word in grade 7?
@no1marauder saidWhat I wrote. They want her to own up to knowing what was happening.
Let's say for the sake of argument she did know people were being killed in the camp.
Does that make a secretary "complicit" in the murders? How about a janitor?
And what really is the point of prosecution at this time anyway?
It’s to show people that you can run, but can’t hide from justice.
Her level of responsibility is minimal. But she didn’t come forward during earlier trials to explain what was happening either.
I’m not sure if it’s the route I would take,
But I understand the drive.
Especially with the extreme right on the rise.