Laws against "boycott Israel"

@wajoma said
No, find a quiet corner, sit down and reread your post, and this time try to understand what you typed..

If your not lying ( which you are ) you could quote the post where you claim I said what you claim I said, but no not even grown enough to have a chat with yourself.

@quackquack said
It is laughable that you think you feel you can interfere with an agreement of employment between a worker and an employer when both sides know what in there best interests far better than you. It is astonishing that you could comment about a labor agreement in a region that you are completely unfamiliar with and have no idea the other opportunities for foreign workers, ...[text shortened]... eel very comfortable with the values of free trade and am shocked by the ignorance of protectionism.

And another halfwit right winger enters the arena with his pants down and a party popper up his jacksie.
I’m not interfering with any employee / employer agreements I’m saying that if the product wants access to our domestic market it should be taxed to a level that negates any difference in wage levels.
If they have a better business model or innovative technology that makes them more competitive then yeah as a consumer I’ll have some of that. But developed consumer based nations should not exploit the work force of another nation for cheap products that make them guilty of slave labour by association and destroy or unfairly compromise their own manufacturing base and workforce.
Please do not be as disingenuous as some in this thread and pretend you cannot understand what I’m saying.