14 Jan 23
1 edit
@kevcvs57 said"Fraternity"? What do you mean?
So race trumps fraternity amongst criminals in the US and pretty much everything else, you couldn’t ‘knock me down with a feather’.
Murder of a robber is not a dishonorable crime amongst criminals and those white boys on the inside need warriors to protect them from the much more numerous Blacks and Mexicans. It's not like he raped a thirteen year old or snitched on someone. That would be very bad for him. But murder of a Black robber? Perfectly respectable amongst white criminals.
14 Jan 23
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidThat's why it's not first degree murder.
How bout an extreme increase of adrenalin? You just discount that?
https://legaldictionary.net/second-degree-murder
Second degree murder is the criminal act of killing another person with intent, but without pre-meditation.
- Joined
- 20 May 16
- Moves
- 42469
14 Jan 23
@kevcvs57 saidSo tell me what you would find acceptable in a situation like this, what would you do? Are you assuming the shooter was a calm, balanced in all situations, fast thinking and trained in these situations? Or do you think he freaked out, didn’t know what the hell was going on except he wanted to live badly and someone was illegally trying to take that away from him plus others. Should he assume the guy is also a well balanced robber, not going to shoot, drugs and on?? Flake on brother flake on join the real world.
Yeah because Wajoma a right wing scumbag sidekick of JJs who could not contain his laughter at an incapacitated human being shot in the head is bound to be upset about a prison rape joke 🙄
I wonder if Wajoma ever tells the truth about himself or anything else on these forums or is the hard man Kiwi persona with a welding mask there to hide his real ID as just another US incel dweeb strutting up and down his keyboard
14 Jan 23
2 edits
@athousandyoung said
"Fraternity"? What do you mean?
Murder of a robber is not a dishonorable crime amongst criminals and those white boys on the inside need warriors to protect them from the much more numerous Blacks and Mexicans. It's not like he raped a thirteen year old or snitched on someone. That would be very bad for him. But murder of a Black robber? Perfectly respectable amongst white criminals.
Omar from the Wire:
"Hey look I ain't never put my gun on no citizen"
A robber is not a "citizen" or "civilian" in street terms. A robber is "in the game" and if he gets killed other criminals won't consider it dishonorable.
14 Jan 23
@kevcvs57 saidLet me worry about the details as to the how, if it requires any personal expenditure I expect that to be covered by the winnings from wager we're about to agree upon if you've got the balls. 2000USD to you if you prove your 'hypothesis'. You and shag doody could go 50/50.
How are you going to prove your nationality without giving away serious personal info on an anonymous chess site. Being an actual Kiwi wouldn’t change your right wing colours I was just hypothesising about a possible tactic to bolster that independent Liberal voice you pretend to have.
You’re the HYPOCRITE as ever. You didn’t pull JJ up for asserting that a defenceless man ...[text shortened]... a prison rape joke.
You’re a hypocrite of the highest order and about as genuine as 9 dollar note.
Your hypocrisy, for the 5th time, was getting righteous and indignant at JJ's 'laughing' comment and then coming out with the, very unoriginal, prison rape trope with the shooter requiring medical treatment the rape you wish upon him being so brutal.
Everybody that thinks the shooting was justified, (or in my case at least understandable) does not think it was funny. Just as I credit those that think the shooter is guilty of something don't like to make cracks about prison rapes where the victim requires medical treatment.
We can all make judgements on the character of another poster based on what they find funny, just as we can make judgments on how much of a hypocrite you are by looking at two of your posts made within a day of each other.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@shallow-blue saidHe should have jumped up and shouted "Draw!" or something, like in a movie?
In the back... what a coward. He wouldn't last two days in Tombstone. That's the kind of "vigilante" who needs lynching.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
15 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidA man doesn't shoot a man in the back. It doesn't surprise me that you applaud someone who does.
He should have jumped up and shouted "Draw!" or something, like in a movie?
@shallow-blue saidExactly the problem kev has, been watching too many movies.
In the back... what a coward. He wouldn't last two days in Tombstone. That's the kind of "vigilante" who needs lynching.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
15 Jan 23
@wajoma saidSame people that claim cops should shoot someone in the arm or leg to disable them instead of trying to kill them or shoot the tires out of cars that are trying to run them over, etc..
Exactly the problem kev has, been watching too many movies.
They have a child-like concept of guns.
15 Jan 23
@athousandyoung saidBlack inmates might feel differently and this ‘warrior’ won’t have his gun to shoot the black inmates in the back with.
"Fraternity"? What do you mean?
Murder of a robber is not a dishonorable crime amongst criminals and those white boys on the inside need warriors to protect them from the much more numerous Blacks and Mexicans. It's not like he raped a thirteen year old or snitched on someone. That would be very bad for him. But murder of a Black robber? Perfectly respectable amongst white criminals.
You have a very strange idea of what constitutes a warrior
15 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidI’ve handled and fired weaponry you could only dream of.
Same people that claim cops should shoot someone in the arm or leg to disable them instead of trying to kill them or shoot the tires out of cars that are trying to run them over, etc..
They have a child-like concept of guns.
If you cannot disable an unarmed man with a handgun you are not competent to carry that gun on behalf of the state.
15 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidNo if he had to shoot the guy in the back to ensure the safety of others and himself then that’s perfectly reasonable. What he definitely did not have to do was to shoot him in the head.
He should have jumped up and shouted "Draw!" or something, like in a movie?
I think it’s you and Wajoma that have been watching too many badly researched films
15 Jan 23
1 edit
@wajoma saidYou can shove your 2000 dollars where sun doesn’t shine, I would be as likely to believe any evidence you produce as I am anything you say on this forum. If you want to prove your place of residence then you can just do it there’s no need for a bet
Let me worry about the details as to the how, if it requires any personal expenditure I expect that to be covered by the winnings from wager we're about to agree upon if you've got the balls. 2000USD to you if you prove your 'hypothesis'. You and shag doody could go 50/50.
Your hypocrisy, for the 5th time, was getting righteous and indignant at JJ's 'laughing' comment and ...[text shortened]... on how much of a hypocrite you are by looking at two of your posts made within a day of each other.
Being labelled a hypocrite by a poster who supports / fails to condemn another poster laughing at a video of an actual human being being shot in the head whilst lying wounded and defenceless on the floor, then feigning upset about a joke cantered on the non existent rape of the guy who committed the above atrocity shows you to be a HYPOCRITE of the highest order
But your biggest hypocritical falsehood is still pretending to be a Libertarian when you are clearly a far right wing anti libertarian