15 Sep 23
@shavixmir saidok, fine. But suggesting there were controlled explosions would be considered a conspiracy, given that it would also require an elaborate government cover up.
I totally agree.
The chances of it being an actual conspiracy are very low.
However, what I am saying, is that the chances of 3 buildings collapsing in on themselves when the structural damage is not at base level, seems to me, quite low. As I said, I am not an expert on the subject of demolition or structural integerity of buildings. And I do see why it could lead to ...[text shortened]... ally fishy going on (probably not a conspiracy, but more in the lines of it costing too much money).
The internet ropes you in. That video is so convincing that the building came down by choice.
Maybe the only plausible conspiracy I can imagine is that the owner of the building saw an opportunity to add some liquidity to his portfolio and quietly asked a few of his employees to make sure the building didn't survive the day.
15 Sep 23
@wildgrass saidNo, no, no.
ok, fine. But suggesting there were controlled explosions would be considered a conspiracy, given that it would also require an elaborate government cover up.
The internet ropes you in. That video is so convincing that the building came down by choice.
Maybe the only plausible conspiracy I can imagine is that the owner of the building saw an opportunity to add some li ...[text shortened]... portfolio and quietly asked a few of his employees to make sure the building didn't survive the day.
I do not say it was controlled explosions. Good grief! I am saying that to me, a non-expert on the matter, it looked like controlled explosions and that I can understand why some people think it could be a conspiracy.
The experts have researched it. And the research has been peer reviewed. The buildings came down due to heat weakening and expanding the steel structure and the floors collapsed in on themselves.
Same in tower 7.
There have, actually, been various buildings since that have had major fires in upper floors and came down in the exact same fashion.
15 Sep 23
@shavixmir
"There have, actually, been various buildings since that have had major fires in upper floors and came down in the exact same fashion"
What is your source of information?
15 Sep 23
@metal-brain saidNews reports on these buildings coming down.
@shavixmir
"There have, actually, been various buildings since that have had major fires in upper floors and came down in the exact same fashion"
What is your source of information?
Why. What's yours?
15 Sep 23
@shavixmir saidYou are wrong.
News reports on these buildings coming down.
Why. What's yours?
No steel building ever came down from a mere fire before building 7 did.
@metal-brain saidREAD FOR FUKK'S SAKE.
You are wrong.
No steel building ever came down from a mere fire before building 7 did.
SINCE 9-11 there have been multiple reports of the same sorts of structures coming down in the same fashion due to heat damage.
Seriously. No wonder you believe the strangest fantasies, you just make things up as you read.
15 Sep 23
@shavixmir saidOnce again: What is your source of information?
READ FOR FUKK'S SAKE.
SINCE 9-11 there have been multiple reports of the same sorts of structures coming down in the same fashion due to heat damage.
Seriously. No wonder you believe the strangest fantasies, you just make things up as you read.
@metal-brain saidOkay, shyt for brains...
Once again: What is your source of information?
Google:
- Plasco Building progressive collapse
or
- Windsor Tower (Madrid) collapse
or
- Surfside condominium collapse
Or
- Edificio Wilton Paes de Almeida collapse
Dude, not only has the internet roped you in, it's stangled you after dragging you through the streets naked.
15 Sep 23
@shavixmir saidWas that so hard?
Okay, shyt for brains...
Google:
- Plasco Building progressive collapse
or
- Windsor Tower (Madrid) collapse
or
- Surfside condominium collapse
Or
- Edificio Wilton Paes de Almeida collapse
Dude, not only has the internet roped you in, it's stangled you after dragging you through the streets naked.
Now, did any of those buildings come down like a controlled demolition as building 7 did?
@metal-brain saidAll of them.
Was that so hard?
Now, did any of those buildings come down like a controlled demolition as building 7 did?
And none were controlled detonations. Look them up and look at the videos.
There you go lad, you're on your own from now on.
15 Sep 23
@shavixmir saidLiar.
All of them.
And none were controlled detonations. Look them up and look at the videos.
There you go lad, you're on your own from now on.
The one in Madrid only partially collapsed.
You have no video proof. You look them up.
@metal-brain said🙄
Liar.
The one in Madrid only partially collapsed.
You have no video proof. You look them up.
16 Sep 23
@wildgrass saidOne thing does strike me as insufficiently clarified about the events of 9/11. Look at the photos of the damage done to the Pentagon. Where is the jet debris ?? Where are the fuselage bits? Where are the engine bits? Where are the seats and baggage? And where is the trench the fuselage dug before it hit ?? Look at other photos of crash sites: a jet leaves a huge trail of debris and wreckage. “The fire dept. cleaned it up,” some will say. Baloney. Forensic experts would have been swarming all over the site for days before anyone was allowed to remove anything. I’m not saying I know what hit the Pentagon. I’m only saying, it’s not what we were told.
Trending twitter topic today, on 9/11 anniversary is "BUILDING 7"
What is building 7? You should never ask the Internet. The conspiracy posits that 9/11 was a diversion designed to purposely destroy evidence of financial crimes, and justify nanny-state neo-conservative dominance of the world.
Evidence of a conspiracy? Three lines..
1) The steel-reinforced 40 story ...[text shortened]... it's presented on Twitter, it looks pretty convincing that building 7 was a purposefully demolished.
16 Sep 23
@moonbus saidRemember when they released video footage of what they claimed was the plane that hit the pentagon and it didn't show anything hit the pentagon at all? Did they think we would just imagine something was there to see?
One thing does strike me as insufficiently clarified about the events of 9/11. Look at the photos of the damage done to the Pentagon. Where is the jet debris ?? Where are the fuselage bits? Where are the engine bits? Where are the seats and baggage? And where is the trench the fuselage dug before it hit ?? Look at other photos of crash sites: a jet leaves a huge trail of debr ...[text shortened]... anything. I’m not saying I know what hit the Pentagon. I’m only saying, it’s not what we were told.
Why would they release video footage claiming there was a plane to see that showed nothing hit the pentagon? Do they think we are stupid?
17 Sep 23
1 edit
Alrernatively… if that plane didn’t hit the pentagon… where did it and all the passengers go?
Anything you can think of is far more complicated than that the plane went into the Pentagon. So what’s more likely? The photos taken aren’t good enough or that they disappeared a plane and passengers and launched something else into the building?
And that’s the sum of it all.
https://www.military.com/history/25-intense-photos-pentagon-9-11.html
For example shows pieces of aircraft scattered about.
So, they disappeared an airplane and passengers, chucked something else into the building and then scattered some pieces of aircraft around for the photo oppertunity… uhuh…