152d
@shavixmir saidDo you think I wrote that, I saw it on the news yesterday and found this link after you mouthed off…
Utter BS
@Suzianne
Looks like the shooter was just a kid, 20 years old and guess what, a registered Republican.
I guess that puts down my theory, he probably got his rifle from his dad's collection and daddy will be in deep doo doo if true.
152d
@sonhouse said20 yrs old is a kid? Maybe in the US. That explains a lot about why the US is in such a mess. This 20 yr old is part of the lame generation... or maybe she/he is a trans.
@Suzianne
Looks like the shooter was just a kid, 20 years old and guess what, a registered Republican.
I guess that puts down my theory, he probably got his rifle from his dad's collection and daddy will be in deep doo doo if true.
Reminds me of a post I saw, where 40 yrs ago a motor car manual explained how to adjust the points and check the timing. Now with this new generation they have to put warnings not the drink the battery fluid ... lol
@Cliff-Mashburn saidI never said more or less powerful.
I've been reloading the 5.56/7.62 and 9mm rounds for years.
The 9mm muzzle energy is 350 ft/lbs.
The 5.56 is over 1200 ft/lbs, 7.62 is over 2500.
Yes, the 9mm is .355 caliber, but trying to infer it's more powerful because it's "bigger" is retarded.
I said bigger, and it's taken this long for you to concede the point.
@sonhouse saidJared Lee Loughner was 22 when he very nearly killed Gabby Giffords.
@Suzianne
Looks like the shooter was just a kid, 20 years old and guess what, a registered Republican.
I guess that puts down my theory, he probably got his rifle from his dad's collection and daddy will be in deep doo doo if true.
152d
@Suzianne saidI said that the 9mm was not very effective at 150 yards compared to the 5.56 and 7.62,
I never said more or less powerful.
I said bigger, and it's taken this long for you to concede the point.
You responded with the claim that the 9mm was bigger, as if that meant it was more powerful.
Next time say what you mean.
@mike69 saidWhat did you mean by “Moro”?
Never heard of that. Im the one that thumbed up your post when you made fun of me. It was funny to me, this was just me adding some self humor from that and telling you I don’t give a crap.
@divegeester saidA) yes, it was staged, to increase Trump’s persecution / victim rating and gain sympathy votes.
Well it didn’t take you long to slide down the silly conspiracy theory slide did it.
But let’s consider what you’re suggesting here; Trump organised a shooter to make a FAKE assassination attempt, and the shooter was so good that he could nick Trump’s ear at 150 yards.
That is what you’re suggesting right?
B) no bullet struck Trump; the wound was caused by something else.
C) how can a shooter who squeezes off 8 rounds in 3 seconds, at 150 yards, miss a fat non-moving target, unless he wants to ?
D) it need not have been organized by Trump himself or with his personal knowledge and consent.
Too bad about the guy in the bleachers, eh ?
EDIT:
It is essential to the plot that the shooter is eliminated before he can be in interrogated. It is essential to the plot that the shooter is characterized as a loaner. However, one still has to ask, who gave those shooters access to buildings with a line of sight shot? Does the name Lee Harvey Oswald sound familiar?
@moonbus saidIf you're trying to hit something at range firing 8 shots in 3 seconds is not the best way
A) yes, it was staged, to increase Trump’s persecution / victim rating and gain sympathy votes.
B) no bullet struck Trump; the wound was caused by something else.
C) how can a shooter who squeezes off 8 rounds in 3 seconds, at 150 yards, miss a fat non-moving target, unless he wants to ?
D) it need not have been organized by Trump himself or with his personal knowledge and consent.
Too bad about the guy in the bleachers, eh ?
@AThousandYoung saidDidn’t have glasses on couldn’t see and forgot the n.
What did you mean by “Moro”?