Go back
Trump's Mar-a-Lago raided.

Trump's Mar-a-Lago raided.

Debates

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
11 Aug 22

@metal-brain said
You hope Biden doesn't run because you know he would lose.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/biden-poll-democrats-elections-2024-b2120493.html

64% of democrats know he would lose against Trump. Either that or they are counting on Trump failing to win the GOP nomination. Which do you think it is?

Hillary Clinton was emailing classified ...[text shortened]... is not going to hurt Trump. The hypocrisy is evident to people less partisan than you and sonhouse.
He won't lose against Trump but there are better Democrats, so your attempts to read my mind are as stupid as most of your posts.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
11 Aug 22

@averagejoe1 said
You disappoint me more every day, Marauder. Sounds like the Suzy person. Pitiful. But, what to expect from a Marxist.
I dont do trial work, farm it out, but I believe I could beat your hype in court anyway . Pick the Courtroom. I will, of course, demand a jury trial.
If you ever read the US Constitution, you'd know it gives the definition of what "treason" is in this country.

But it's been shown many times on this board that you and your fellow right wingers have little clue as to what is in the Constitution.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Aug 22

@no1marauder
"Larson wrote in his book “On Treason: A Citizen’s Guide to the Law,” from 2020, that the Framers “had a very specific image in mind—men gathering with guns, forming an army, and marching on the seat of government.” Few events in American history, if any, have matched that description as clearly as the insurrection of January 6th, which, court documents suggest, was planned by milita members who may have intended to capture elected officials."

Get rid of those fukking MAGS, they are not here to hurt ME.
Trump KNEW there were armed insurrectionists in the crowd so it was in fact an armed attack on the seat of government and if that isn't treason we need a better understanding of the word.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54934
Clock
11 Aug 22

@vivify said
Answer the question: if the FBI is a Dem tool, why are they are collecting "mountains" of evidence that can used against Hunter?

Think before you speak.
Vivify now recognizes the confusing hypocritical hell being brought down upon our country. Why, you ask????? Why are they doing everything they are doing, Vivify?
WHY don't we know why the raid on Trump?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
11 Aug 22

@averagejoe1 said
Vivify now recognizes the confusing hypocritical hell being brought down upon our country. Why, you ask????? Why are they doing everything they are doing, Vivify?
WHY don't we know why the raid on Trump?
We do..........
— Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code — makes it a crime if someone who has custody of government documents or records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54934
Clock
11 Aug 22

@sonhouse said
@no1marauder
"Larson wrote in his book “On Treason: A Citizen’s Guide to the Law,” from 2020, that the Framers “had a very specific image in mind—men gathering with guns, forming an army, and marching on the seat of government.” Few events in American history, if any, have matched that description as clearly as the insurrection of January 6th, which, court documents suggest ...[text shortened]... tack on the seat of government and if that isn't treason we need a better understanding of the word.
Sonhouse, you apparently haven't been watching the news, your administration just raided the home of an expresident. You will recall I have been quite non-plussed by your Jan 6 goings-on, but now THIS story is something to follow.
You will see where early reports called it a
raid', which it was, and 24 hours later EACH lib network dropped that word and ALL of them called it a
Search in the same instant.
You are part of a hell of a sleaZy society, Sonhouse.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54934
Clock
11 Aug 22

@jimm619 said
We do..........
— Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code — makes it a crime if someone who has custody of government documents or records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them.
Let's say we travel on that for a moment. Then our real question here on the forum, is, Hillary did many of these illegal acts. WHY is Trump raided, but Hillary was not?
You are mixed up in sleaze et al

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
11 Aug 22

@averagejoe1 said
Let's say we travel on that for a moment. Then our real question here on the forum, is, Hillary did many of these illegal acts. WHY is Trump raided, but Hillary was not?
You are mixed up in sleaze et al
How long are you clowns going to play this fake "whataboutism" game?

HRC fully cooperated with the rather absurd investigations of her, including being questioned for hours by FBI agents. It seems clear that even after months of requests Trump was still refusing to turn over classified documents he had no business possessing. The fact that a magistrate judge issued a search warrant means he was satisfied that probable cause existed that a crime had been committed and a search of the premises would yield evidence of that crime.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
11 Aug 22

@averagejoe1 said
Let's say we travel on that for a moment. Then our real question here on the forum, is, Hillary did many of these illegal acts. WHY is Trump raided, but Hillary was not?
You are mixed up in sleaze et al
Or ask yourself this: Trump appointees were in charge of the DOJ for four years. How come they never requested a search warrant for HRC's offices or residences if there was sooooooooooooo much evidence of criminality as you have been told by right wing propaganda outlets?

Maybe you've been too gullible ...........
again.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9630
Clock
11 Aug 22

@averagejoe1 said
Let's say we travel on that for a moment. Then our real question here on the forum, is, Hillary did many of these illegal acts. WHY is Trump raided, but Hillary was not?
You are mixed up in sleaze et al
There was nothing to raid. She sat down and gave hours of testimony to the FBI about her servers. She handed over everything that still existed.

Trump did neither of those things. Thus, the raid.

Lesson is that one should comply with law enforcement no?

What would they have raided?

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
11 Aug 22

@wildgrass

Her private server.

oh wait...she had it wiped clean 🤷

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9630
Clock
11 Aug 22

@beowulf said
@wildgrass

Her private server.

oh wait...she had it wiped clean 🤷
Right.

Now it looks like the DOJ is willing to unseal the details from the search warrant, but Trump won't agree to it. He doesn't want people to know why he was raided.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54934
Clock
11 Aug 22

@averagejoe1 said
Let's say we travel on that for a moment. Then our real question here on the forum, is, Hillary did many of these illegal acts. WHY is Trump raided, but Hillary was not?
You are mixed up in sleaze et al
Marauder off on one of his usual segues, he did not see this simple point I made.
Repeat: Why was Trump raided, but Hillary was not. Proven illegal acts, the server in the closet. Why not a midnight raid with guns.?
Marauder, do you realize the guns that were brandished at MaraLago? And y'all bitch at US about power??

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
11 Aug 22

@wildgrass said
Right.

Now it looks like the DOJ is willing to unseal the details from the search warrant, but Trump won't agree to it. He doesn't want people to know why he was raided.
I'm not sure if that's true; the Judge gave Trump's lawyers until 3 PM tomorrow to file any objections.

But I won't be surprised if he does object. And if he does expect all the right wingers who have been demanding DOJ explain the reason for the search to make a 180 degree turn and insist Trump's privacy must be protected or some other lame excuse.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54934
Clock
11 Aug 22

@wildgrass said
Right.

Now it looks like the DOJ is willing to unseal the details from the search warrant, but Trump won't agree to it. He doesn't want people to know why he was raided.
You and Sonhouse have amazing innate knowledge

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.