Go back
What did the Justices do wrong?

What did the Justices do wrong?

Debates

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
11 Jul 22
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
We can all stipulate the role of the justices as same pertains to the Constitution. That is what they did in Roe, resulting in their findings and decision.
So, very specifically, why are the people who don't work picketing for bounties, ....what was the justices' offense to warrant bounties?
I am not being glib. Truly, what is the deal? Assuming that everyon ...[text shortened]... hat is. Those who want to change the law, that is fine, but I am talking about today, this decision.
They perjured themselves during their confirmation hearings.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Jul 22

@jimm619
And if I was in charge I would impeach those basturds.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
11 Jul 22

@shavixmir said
One only needs to look at which countries have abortion banned and which don't.
And it's rather obvious the US is up there with the religious extremists in the Middle-East.
the US hasnt banned abortion...study up, it will keep you from appearing ignorant

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147485
Clock
11 Jul 22

@jimm619 said
They perjured themselves during their confirmation hearings.
no they didnt...you can quote them if you want...but you cant because you are lying

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Jul 22

@Mott-The-Hoople
I heard those hearing and they SAID R V W was established law and they would not touch it, said that just to get through the hearings.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
11 Jul 22

@mott-the-hoople said
cant find that in my reading of the US constitution…can you point it out?
Guns aren't there either.

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
11 Jul 22

@wildgrass said
Guns aren't there either.
Neither are cars but it did say I can own slaves so are we going by the constitution or are you guys going to pick and choose what you like and ban what you don't like?

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
11 Jul 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
cant find that in my reading of the US constitution…can you point it out?
Did you understand any of it?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Jul 22

@Ron-DeSantis
I guess you never heard of amendments.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
11 Jul 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
You compare the US with the Middle-East Islamic states of pain and torture?
Well at least we don't stone women to death for being raped or make them wear horse-blankets from head to toe, with a mesh mask over their face, because they are like, so unclean and evil and stuff..
Not yet.

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
11 Jul 22

@sonhouse said
@Ron-DeSantis
I guess you never heard of amendments.
Exactly.

Picking and choosing what you like and banning what you don't like.
Constitution arguments will never end.

Beowulf
Misfit King

Joined
30 Jun 22
Moves
1100
Clock
11 Jul 22

@suzianne said
Not yet.
Keep bringing them over here and you'll have exactly that.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
11 Jul 22
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
no they didnt...you can quote them if you want...but you cant because you are lying
Do you tire of ALWAYS being wrong.........?
.And, childish name calling is for juveniles.
Oh, anyway, here are FACTS
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/what-gorsuch-kavanaugh-and-barrett-said-about-roe-at-confirmation-hearings/

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
11 Jul 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@Ron-DeSantis
That would be because it had nothing to do with law or jurisprudence, it had EVERYTHING to do with the fact they were Trump appointees who were well known to be extreme right wingers AND beholden to the ultraright religious right.
This was a 100% response to 50 years of ultraright wing religious faction that gained control of at LEAST 1/3 of the entire govern ...[text shortened]... uld support it but it didn't even go as far as raising the age of ownership to 21 like it should be.
As I've said here before, they are merely doing the job they were hired to do.

Did anyone expect anything different?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Jul 22

@Ron-DeSantis
Amendments correct for changes because we are 200 years beyond the original but hey, any change is no good for you. You would own slaves if it was still legal.
Hand grenades were not around 200 years ago and so not in the constitution so should an 18 yo be able to buy those too?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.