What did the Justices do wrong?

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
Yeah, right. Guess what. We actually recognize sarcasm when it is puked out.
BTW, those rightwingers on SCOTUS are just beginning their drive to kill the idea of separation of church and state.
80% and more cases involving CHRISTIAN religions are voted yes by those basturds, but notice not Hindu, not Jewish, not Islam, ONLY Christian suites are voted YES.

...[text shortened]... ATING abortion clinic, safely out in international waters where no fukking state laws can stop them.

Write your legislators and get the law changed, Sonhouse. You are preaching to the wrong crowd. Start a movement. Signs and stuff. Walk in he street. I myself have never been in a street .
It is about law, you know. Being of a mob mindset, you cannot grasp that simple concept.

@no1marauder said
Again, the Ninth Amendment reiterates a principle that the Founders and Framers accepted i.e. that you didn't need to put a right into a written document for that right to belong to the People. The DOI makes clear that such rights are "inalienable" i.e. unable to be taken or given away by their possessor.

What part of this don't you understand?

and you want to bypass the way the constitution lays out to give those rights. it is congress that has that responsibility, not scotus.

I understand it perfectly well, it is you that thinks scotus writes law.

@mott-the-hoople said
and you want to bypass the way the constitution lays out to give those rights. it is congress that has that responsibility, not scotus.

I understand it perfectly well, it is you that thinks scotus writes law.

Rights aren't "given".

@mott-the-hoople said
and you want to bypass the way the constitution lays out to give those rights. it is congress that has that responsibility, not scotus.

I understand it perfectly well, it is you that thinks scotus writes law.

Not to be rude but, honestly,
I don't think you really understand much at all.

@no1marauder said
Rights aren't "given".

LOL…what an idiot

@jimm619 said
Not to be rude but, honestly,
I don't think you really understand much at all.

its understandable for you to say this jimmi, you lack the intellectual ability to debate the subject so you just do a sluzy one liner.

@mott-the-hoople said
LOL…what an idiot

As dumb as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Locke etc. etc. etc.

@mott-the-hoople said
LOL…what an idiot

All due respects to Marauder, we may actually agree with him if he would put his thinking in plain English. Like, I will say the SCOTUS ruled purely on the letter of the Constitution, but Marauder honestly is convoluting that simple sentence by making it not so simple.......but it IS simple. Const (says) that states need to do deal with abortion. But I guess any one of us could drag up all sort of commas and periods in the constitution which would change what they were thinking, or what they meant, or whatever.

@averagejoe1 said
All due respects to Marauder, we may actually agree with him if he would put his thinking in plain English. Like, I will say the SCOTUS ruled purely on the letter of the Constitution, but Marauder honestly is convoluting that simple sentence by making it not so simple.......but it IS simple. Const (says) that states need to do deal with abortion. But I guess any one ...[text shortened]... ds in the constitution which would change what they were thinking, or what they meant, or whatever.

The Constitution says no such thing.

@beowulf said
Easier to get into the USA now than at any time and good ole boys and me get along.

Texas!!

Texas!! 🤠

More coming thru CANADA than MEXICO
.............Where's the outrage?
..Why no wall?.....Hmmmm?
Could it be....gasp.....brown people?

@no1marauder said
As dumb as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Locke etc. etc. etc.

they must have been dumb to not include abortion in the constitution right?

@no1marauder said
The Constitution says no such thing.

correct when talking about abortion.

it is idiotic to think the scotus can just up and give any right they want to.

@mott-the-hoople said
they must have been dumb to not include abortion in the constitution right?

Can you possibly get it through your thick head that they saw no need to include every right in the Constitution? Are you too stupid to understand what the Ninth Amendment explicitly says?

Rights are not given to you by the government; that would imply that rights can be taken away by the government but the Founders said you were endowed with "inalienable" rights.

@mott-the-hoople said
correct when talking about abortion.

it is idiotic to think the scotus can just up and give any right they want to.

It's the SCOTUS' job to invalidate laws which violate your rights.

@sonhouse said
@jimm619
And if I was in charge I would impeach those basturds.

There is a process to impeach a Supreme Court Judge....
Not sure how....Don't feel the urge to look it up.
While a Congressman, Gerald Ford, put forth a motion
to impeach Judge William Douglas.