25 Nov 09
Originally posted by generalissimoI don't want to see Bill O'Reilly ranting like an idiot, so I don't watch FOX news. If you don't want to see homosexuals kissing in public then don't watch shows with homosexuals in them. I fail to see why your moral standard should be binding upon the networks.
because nobody wants to see homosexuals kissing in public, its as simple as that, its inappropiate.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by rwingettI didn't see the clip in question and I never heard of Adam Lambert.
I don't want to see Bill O'Reilly ranting like an idiot, so I don't watch FOX news. If you don't want to see homosexuals kissing in public then don't watch shows with homosexuals in them. I fail to see why your moral standard should be binding upon the networks.
But SOMEONE's "moral standard" has to "be binding upon the networks," don't you think? Should I have to worry that while my 4 year old daughter is watching Sesame Street, Big Bird is going to violently rape Oscar the Grouch?* Someone's got to be the gatekeeper.
* I apologize to anyone whose dinner was just vomited as a result of the mental image described above.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by sh76Rape is illegal. Homosexuality is not.
I didn't see the clip in question and I never heard of Adam Lambert.
But SOMEONE's "moral standard" has to "be binding upon the networks," don't you think? Should I have to worry that while my 4 year old daughter is watching Sesame Street, Big Bird is going to violently rape Oscar the Grouch?* Someone's got to be the gatekeeper.
* I apologize to anyone whose dinner was just vomited as a result of the mental image described above.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by sh76Well, your 4 year old daughter can tune into MTV at any time and see women parading around like cheap prostitutes. I don't see how this particular case is more offending to children.
I didn't see the clip in question and I never heard of Adam Lambert.
But SOMEONE's "moral standard" has to "be binding upon the networks," don't you think? Should I have to worry that while my 4 year old daughter is watching Sesame Street, Big Bird is going to violently rape Oscar the Grouch?* Someone's got to be the gatekeeper.
* I apologize to anyone whose dinner was just vomited as a result of the mental image described above.
25 Nov 09
Originally posted by KazetNagorraSpot on. Just look up any music clip by Lady Gaga for overly sexual performances. No uproar about that slapper.
Well, your 4 year old daughter can tune into MTV at any time and see women parading around like cheap prostitutes. I don't see how this particular case is more offending to children.
26 Nov 09
Originally posted by smw6869Yep, and more. Look up the clip for her song LoveGame.
Has Lady Gaga ever simulated rug munching ?
GRANNY.
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoveGame
Each to his own I say, whilst i think she is an ugly tart, i don’t care what she does. Just like i don’t care if a man kisses another man on TV and I don't see how it is any different to the above.
26 Nov 09
1 edit
Originally posted by sh76😀
I didn't see the clip in question and I never heard of Adam Lambert.
But SOMEONE's "moral standard" has to "be binding upon the networks," don't you think? Should I have to worry that while my 4 year old daughter is watching Sesame Street, Big Bird is going to violently rape Oscar the Grouch?* Someone's got to be the gatekeeper.
* I apologize to anyone whose dinner was just vomited as a result of the mental image described above.
http://video.adultswim.com/aqua-teen-hunger-force/what-are-you-wearing.html
26 Nov 09
Originally posted by EsotericI'll give her a 9 rating.....it had a good beat and was easy to munch to.
Yep, and more. Look up the clip for her song LoveGame.
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoveGame
Each to his own I say, whilst i think she is an ugly tart, i don’t care what she does. Just like i don’t care if a man kisses another man on TV and I don't see how it is any different to the above.
GRANNY.
26 Nov 09
Originally posted by rwingettI fail to see why their moral standards should be binding upon networks.
I don't want to see Bill O'Reilly ranting like an idiot, so I don't watch FOX news. If you don't want to see homosexuals kissing in public then don't watch shows with homosexuals in them. I fail to see why your moral standard should be binding upon the networks.
26 Nov 09
Originally posted by joneschrYou're right. There's just not enough simulated bone chug-a-lugging on T.V. These days. It's all over the place anyway. If i knew Adam was going to simulate a pickle smuggling contest i would have tuned in. I didn't know of his intentions. And how about that voice of his ? It sucks too.
I don't see the big deal. This stuff is all over the place. If you don't like this sort of "entertainment" don't watch it. If you don't want your kids to see stuff like this, don't let them watch these shows. What's so complex?
GRANNY.