Why do right wingers want to end democracy?

@no1marauder said
How ironic to complain about "censorship" and then want the government to regulate what content private companies allow on their own sites!

Not ironic.

They should stop censoring or give up their section 230 protection.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

You are condoning them having it both ways. Me being against that is not ironic. It is common sense.

@metal-brain said
By not shooting anybody until after they got in.

Do you really think the parasitic elites care about 140 police officers they don't know?

There's reams of footage of the mob attacking police officers.

Stop falling for and repeating such transparent lies.

@metal-brain said
Not ironic.

They should stop censoring or give up their section 230 protection.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

You are condoning them having it both ways. Me being against that is not ironic. It is common sense.

LMAO! Section 230 is the opposite of censorship; it allows the owners of sites to be protected from civil liability when they "in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable,".

"Censorship" that restricts "democracy" would be the government telling private owners what they can or can't publish - which is what you favor.

@no1marauder said
That's a lie.

How did 140 police officers get injured?

By not shooting anybody until after they got in.

Think about it using critical thinking skills you obviously normally do not use. How many people did they have to let in for140 police officers to get injured? If you were a capitol police officer how many people would you let in before you started shooting?
One?
Two?
A dozen?
2 dozen?

Is 2 dozen people allowed to break in enough to cause 140 police officers to get injured? I assume all these 140 police officers were armed, right? Why didn't they shoot any of them if those 140 police officers felt so threatened? And why no tasers? Do you really think the parasitic elites care about 140 police officers they don't know?

Trump openly called for protests there. The notion it wasn't expected is absurd.

Again, when would you start shooting people knowing all of the people in the capitol building had an easy escape through a subway tunnel to several optional destinations, including an underground nuclear bunker?

@no1marauder said
LMAO! Section 230 is the opposite of censorship; it allows the owners of sites to be protected from civil liability when they "in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable,".

"Censorship" that restricts "democracy" w ...[text shortened]... d be the government telling private owners what they can or can't publish - which is what you favor.

"Censorship" that restricts "democracy" would be the government telling private owners what they can or can't publish - which is what you favor."

They are already doing that. Why would I want to allow them the Section 230 privilege? How would that be in my interests?

@no1marauder said
There's reams of footage of the mob attacking police officers.

Stop falling for and repeating such transparent lies.

Why did they allow the mob to break in? Did they think the protesters were merely knocking at the door? Perhaps they ignored them because the police thought that they were those annoying Jehovah's witnesses.

Yeah, that could happen......

@wildgrass said
You are right about democrats seeking power overtly. But the opposition of overt is covert.

Republican leadership does not shrink government. There's no evidence of that. They just say it does.

?

@metal-brain said
People who support censorship want to end democracy.
Democrats support censorship, so it is actually the democrats that want to end democracy. Democrats are being manipulated into ending democracy.

There is no democracy without freedom of speech. Democrats need constant reminding of that. They think censorship will preserve democracy. The poison is the cure as far as they are concerned.

Thumb for MB, thank you. I am sure 'they' will learn from your post. No body listens to me............ 😢

@metal-brain said
As if there was any chance that the vote would not take place in the end.
A delay? That is the bogeyman that has dems convinced they have to support censorship?

They let the mob break in. Then they started shooting without warning. Killed an unarmed woman.
Just like the Whitmer kidnapping plot the FBI knew all about it before hand.

https://www.washingtonexaminer ...[text shortened]... ay they could not know it was going to happen is if they put their fingers in their ears and hummed.

Pelosi sat on her hands and knew/watched it happen...but I digress.

@metal-brain said
Censorship of the POTUS as well as a lot of other censorship. Twitter is censoring the truth about the gene vaccines. They do not stop the spread.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/highly-vaccinated-countries-thought-were-154515101.html

Then after the censored Trump he didn't even try to be heard on another social media platform. Trump is a slug helping the establishment destroy what little is left of democracy here. He and Biden should both be stoned to death.

I would give up Trump if for god sakes Biden could be removed. (using nice language here...). Alas, I think it will be too late, and especially if our savior Manchin does not hold his ground, behind the barricade. Can't you just see Suzianne in her caped-crusader suit attacking said baracade!!!!

@metal-brain said
Why did they allow the mob to break in? Did they think the protesters were merely knocking at the door? Perhaps they ignored them because the police thought that they were those annoying Jehovah's witnesses.

Yeah, that could happen......

Pelosi allowed the break in, held the guard back.

@averagejoe1 said
Thumb for MB, thank you. I am sure 'they' will learn from your post. No body listens to me............ 😢

Got that right.
FINALLY, A FACT~!

@averagejoe1 said
Pelosi sat on her hands and knew/watched it happen...but I digress.

REALLY?
I DID NOT KNOW THAT/

@averagejoe1 said
Pelosi sat on her hands and knew/watched it happen...but I digress.

She could have been going through the capitol subway to safety. All of them could have. They stayed so they could over dramatize it all to dupe people into thinking they were genuinely fearful.

https://www.aoc.gov/explore-capitol-campus/buildings-grounds/capitol-building/capitol-subway-system

It was all a sham. It is like saying they couldn't have left through the back door of a house when the Jehovah's Witnesses were knocking on the front door. Only the subway is better than a back door because nobody can knock on the door in the back since there is no subway door outside.

@averagejoe1 said
Pelosi allowed the break in, held the guard back.

A ridiculous lie.

Pelosi had no control of any law enforcement or military units.